cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Bhim Prakoso
Contact Email
jik@unej.ac.id
Phone
+6281249290088
Journal Mail Official
jik@unej.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember Jl. Kalimantan No. 37, Krajan Timur, Sumbersari, Jember, Jawa Timur 68121 ​​https://law.unej.ac.id sekretariat.fh@unej.ac.id 0331 - 335462
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan
Published by Universitas Jember
ISSN : 27231011     EISSN : 27231011     DOI : 10.19184/JIK
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
JURNAL ILMU KENOTARIATAN merupakan Jurnal yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember yang bertemakan Ilmu Hukum berkaitan dengan Kenotariatan, dengan manfaat dan tujuan bagi perkembangan Ilmu Hukum, khususnya Hukum Kenotariatan. Tujuan dari publikasi Jurnal ini adalah untuk memberikan ruang kepada penulis untuk mempublikasikan pemikiran hasil penelitian orisinalnya, baik para akademisi yaitu mahasiswa maupun dosen, ataupun para praktisi hukum. Fokus dan Lingkup penulisan dalam Jurnal ini memfokuskan diri mempublikasikan artikel ilmiah hukum yang berkaitan dengan bidang kenotariatan dengan topik-topik sebagai berikut: Hukum Kenotariatan. Hukum Pertanahan. Cyber Notary. Hukum Perdata. Hukum Bisnis. Hukum Administrasi. Hukum Internasional. Hukum Acara. Hukum Dan Masyarakat. Hukum Informasi Teknologi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Hukum Kontemporer.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 1: May 2021" : 5 Documents clear
Perluasan Kewenangan Pelaporan Majelis Pengawas Notaris: Diskursus Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan Substantif Fenny Tria Yunita; Malik Wahyu Kurniawan
Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan Vol. 2 No. 1: May 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4238.508 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/jik.v2i1.24870

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the new authority of the notary supervisory board in reporting an ethic and performance violations which committed by notary and its relation to the principles of certainty and justice. According to the Regulation issued by Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia number 15 of 2020 concerning The Procedures for Examination of the Notary Supervisory Board (MPN), the authority of MPN has being enlarged. This regulation give a bigger authority for MPN to report and make a report as the result of the implementation of notary’s occupation, so that the MPN can examine and make decisions according to their own report. Otherwise, the Notary Act (UUJN) only gives MPN an authority to examine and make decisions based on reports of people who have been violated by Notary. This can be seen in Article 73 paragraph (1) of the UUJN which states that "The Regional Supervisory Council is authorized to hold sessions to examine and make decisions on public reports that can be submitted through the Regional Supervisory Council". Through a normative legal research, this paper consist on two central issues. First, the legal reasoning of new authority of MPN and its consistence with Notary Act. Second, the discourse of this new authority obtained by MPN with the principle of certainty and substantive justice.
Covid 19 Sebagai Force Majeure untuk Menunda Pelaksanaan Kontrak yang Termuat dalam Akta Notaris: Covid 19 Sebagai Force Majeure untuk Menunda Pelaksanaan Kontrak yang Termuat dalam Akta Notaris Mahardhika Gilang Aditya
Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan Vol. 2 No. 1: May 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4159.003 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/jik.v2i1.23419

Abstract

Corona Virus Disease (Covid 19) has a significant impact on all aspects of human life. One of the aspects affected by Covid 19 is the business sector, especially in contract implementation. A Contract is an agreement made or agreed upon by the parties in writing. An agreement exists because of an act committed between one or more people against one or more people who bind themselves to each other. So that this event creates a legal relationship between the parties, which includes rights and obligations. In a contract, there is usually a clause or arrangement related to a forced condition or what is known as a force majeure (overmacht). The regulation relating to force majeure exists because to protect the debtor when in the execution of the contract contained in the notariil deed, the debtor in carrying out his obligations to the creditor occurs an event that is beyond the power of the party concerned. Force majeure can be categorized as earthquakes, floods, landslides, wars, fires, military coups, embargoes, epidemics, and so on. During the corona pandemic that is currently sweeping all parts of the world certainly has an impact on the implementation of a contract. Therefore, further explanation is needed regarding the impact of Covid 19 as force majeure to delay implementation of the contracts contained in the notarial needed. KEYWORDS: Covid 19, Contract, Force Majeure, Notarial Deed.
Status Hukum Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Prespektif Tata Usaha Negara Surya Hartarto Purwowibowo
Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan Vol. 2 No. 1: May 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4454.732 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/jik.v2i1.18390

Abstract

A notary of social institutions are in indonesia, of the needs arising from desires evidence any law keperdataan among mereka.akta authentic can result in dispute, so we needed evidence any written in the form of photocopies minuta and testimony a notary certificate. A notary can be checked as the officials who makes a covenant. Investigators, the public prosecutor and the judge called a notary and received a photocopy of certificate minuta. The legal status of the notary is as the manager of a mandate from the minister of justice and human rights in giving approval or rejection to be examined by a notary, investigators prosecutors and judges in the judiciary and the copy of deed minuta used as evidence a related reports of one party. The legal status is a situation when a party considered eligible to apply for dispute resolution. The decision made the honor notary can be sued by a notary in judicial administrative as there are two decisions that court decisions administrative number 21/G/2017/PTUN.SBY and 24/G/2017/PTUN.SBY. An authentic deed load in accordance with the will of the parties. Formal to make clear the notarial deed and earnest perceptible by the parties with read it. Notaries should not leave due examination are responsible for a notary is an expression of truth when. certificateThe need for inspection by the notary of a notary can be sued in state administrative courts cause kekabuaran meaning administrative officials.
Batas Pertanggungjawaban Notaris atas Pembuatan Akta Otentik Ahmad Farich Sultoni
Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan Vol. 2 No. 1: May 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4148.419 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/jik.v2i1.20961

Abstract

Notary profession is a profession that provides legal protection and certainty for justice seekers. This profession is inherent in various people's lives in several sectors, such as business, banking, property and others. therefore, the importance of notary competence in the making of deed must be further enhanced given the complexity of the demands of his position in providing solutions to the community regarding the needs arising from alliances, especially in the making of deeds that become very vital. Because, notary public must be responsible for the authentic deed to the parties. So the principle of prudence must be properly applied by a notary public. Many notaries must be responsible for their errors or omissions caused by the making of authentic deed that is problematic, defective or not in accordance with the laws and regulations.
Prinsip Pembacaan Akta Oleh Notaris Dihadapan Penghadap dan Saksi Maya Puspita Dewi; Herowati Poesoko; Aries Harianto
Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan Vol. 2 No. 1: May 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4534.652 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/jik.v2i1.19349

Abstract

Pembacaan akta oleh notaris merupakan hal yang penting karena banyak kepentingan yang terkait didalamnya. Pembacaan akta dimaksudkan untuk memastikan bahwa akta otentik yang dibuat oleh Notaris sesuai dengan keinginan atau kehendak para penghadap yang membuat akta. Adanya pengecualian dalam pengaturan mengenai pembacaan akta dalam UUJN , dapat dijadikan tameng untuk tidak melakukan pembacaan akta seperti yang diamanatkan dalam Pasal 16 ayat 1 huruf m UUJN. Hal ini tentu saja akan berdampak pada besarnya kemungkinan terjadi konflik hukum diwaktu yang akan datang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan 3 (tiga) pendekatan yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan sejarah. Hasil dari penelitian adalah bahwa Ratio Legis dari pengaturan mengenai Kewajiban Pembacaan Akta yang mewajibkan Notaris untuk membacakan akta didasari pada landasan filosofis dari pembentukan Undang-Undang tersebut, yang secara eksplisit dinyatakan dalam Pasal 3 UUD NRI 1945, bahwa Negara menjamin kepastian dan perlindungan hukum yang berintikan kebenaran dan keadilan terwujud didalam masyarakat. Akan tetapi beragam kepentingan yang melatarbelakangi pembentukan undang-undang mengenai pengaturan kewajiban pembacaan Akta tersebut, menjadikan peraturan ini tidak konsististen yang berakibat tidak adanya kepastian hukum didalamnya.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 2: Nov 2025 Vol. 6 No. 1: May 2025 Vol. 5 No. 2: Nov 2024 Vol. 5 No. 1: May 2024 Vol. 4 No. 2: November 2023 Vol. 4 No. 1: May 2023 Vol. 3 No. 2: November 2022 Vol. 3 No. 1: May 2022 Vol. 2 No. 2: November 2021 Vol. 2 No. 1: May 2021 Vol. 1 No. 2: November 2020 Vol. 1 No. 1: May 2020 More Issue