cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Satrio Alif Febriyanto
Contact Email
satrio.alif@ui.ac.id
Phone
0816200129
Journal Mail Official
konsdem@ui.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Prof. Mr. Djokosoetono, Kampus UI Baru, Pondok Cina, Depok, 16424
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi dan Demokrasi
  • publication:jurnalkonsdem
  • Website
Published by Universitas Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28089715     DOI : 10.7454/JKD
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Konstitusi dan Demokrasi adalah Jurnal Ilmiah di bidang Hukum Tata Negara yang terbit sebanyak satu kali setiap tahunnya pada bulan Oktober. Jurnal Konstitusi dan Demokrasi diterbitkan oleh Bidang Studi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. Jurnal ini berisi tulisan hasil penelitian dan pemikiran di bidang hukum tata negara serta isu yang mencakup pemilihan umum, hak asasi manusia, kekuasaan kehakiman, lembaga perwakilan rakyat, dan isu hukum tata negara lainnya.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1, No. 1" : 5 Documents clear
Memperkenalkan Peradilan Etika Asshiddiqie, Prof. Jimly
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi Vol. 1, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Ambivalensi Penegakan Kode Etik dan Upaya Hukum terhadap Putusan Kode Etik Siregar, Praise Juinta W.S.
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi Vol. 1, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Election Organizing Honorary Council (hereinafter referred to as DKPP) is a state institution that is authorized by law to enforce the code of ethics. The journey of DKPP in the code of ethics can be said to have dynamics. Follow-up of the DKPP Decision by issuing a Decree issued by the President. The General Election Commission and the Election Supervisory Body are potential legal remedies in the form of a lawsuit to the State Administrative Court. This raises a problem, whether the State Administrative Court does not examine and decide on the lawsuit, considering that the decision is based on the DKPP Decision, which is final and binding, which is final and binding, which can be done if there are parties who are not satisfied with the DKPP Decision.
Pro Kontra Penegakan Etik Secara Internal dan Eksternal Angraini, Fauziah Suci
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi Vol. 1, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Ethical enforcement is starting to be seen as an important part of the norm system prevailing in society, whose it development cannot be separated from the existence of state institutions and professional organizations that demand public trust. Ethics has a direct contribution to the law enforcement, especially in monitoring the behavior of individuals by providing assurance to the public regarding the integrity of the behavior of law enforcers, public servants and professionals. The establishment of this ethical supervisory and enforcement agency can be found in various forms, it can be in the form of an inherent organ in the organization / institution that it supervises (internal) or that which stands as a separate institution (external). The debate began to emerge when the non-uniformity of the ethical supervisory institutions was considered to affect the procedures and quality of ethical enforcement itself. On the one hand, the internal enforcement of ethics is considered to be more protective of the dignity of individuals and organizations having ethical cases. But on the other hand, internal monitoring and enforcement of ethics has the potential to leave major questions from the aspect of ethics enforcers' independence. This problem is one of the fundamental question that must first be resolved in connection with the search for an ideal ethics enforcement supervisory institution format.
Check and Balances dalam Sistem Peradilan Etik Werdiningsih, Mega Ayu
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi Vol. 1, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The principle of checks and balances is closely related to the principle of separation of powers in the constitutional system, which in its development, the application of checks and balances emphasizes the importance of mutual control relationships between various branches of state administration, including within the scope of the judicial system. If in the legal justice system in the context of judicial power, the application of the principle of checks and balances is not new – that is through supervision by the House of Representatives (DPR) which is authorized to propose changes to the Supreme Court law and external supervision by the Judicial Commission (KY) on the behavior of judges according to the Code of Ethics-, therefore, the application of the principle of checks and balances should also be a concern in the ethical justice system. Considering, nowadays, the judicial system does not only include the legal justice system (Court of Law) but also includes the ethical justice system (Court of Ethics). For this reason, this paper examines the application of the principle of checks and balances in the ethical justice system, especially in the ethical justice system which still applies closed ethical trials, namely the Honorary Council of the DPR (MKD), the Honorary Council of Judges (MKH) and the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court (MKMK). By knowing and paying attention to the application of the principle of checks and balances in the ethical justice system, it is hoped that the development of the ethical justice system (Court of Ethics) and the Court of Law will be implemented.
Perdebatan Etika Vs Hukum Sebagai Norma yang Memiliki Sanksi Mengikat Bagi Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) di Lingkungan Kementerian Keuangan Putri, Bonita Cinintya
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi Vol. 1, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Ethics is an order of behavior based on a system of values in a particular society, which is more appropriate to be associated with science or philosophy. Therefore, ethics is more local or special. Ethical Philosophy not only pays attention to what is right or wrong, but also to good and bad judgments about things. The State Civil Apparatus has an important role in creating a law-abiding, modern, democratic, prosperous, fair and moral civil society in providing services fairly and equitably. Judicial institutions, in particular the District Courts, may not refuse to adjudicate a case submitted to them in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations, on the grounds that there are no stipulating rules for adjudicating the case. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to see the boundaries of a problem that binds civil servant employees brought into the realm of ethics and the realm of law (judicial). The existence of an article regarding unlawful acts causes many people to file a lawsuit to the District Court on the pretext of violating their rights but does not mention the elements of unlawful acts as stated in article 1365 of the Civil Code.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5, No. 1 Vol. 4, No. 2 Vol. 4, No. 1 Vol. 3, No. 2 Vol. 3, No. 1 Vol. 2, No. 2 Vol. 2, No. 1 Vol. 1, No. 2 Vol. 1, No. 1