cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
pratiwi puspitho andini
Contact Email
jpel@unej.ac.id
Phone
+6281332727076
Journal Mail Official
jpel@unej.ac.id
Editorial Address
jalan gajah mada XI no 19
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Journal of Private and Economic Law
Published by Universitas Jember
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27978702     DOI : https://doi.org/10.19184/jpel
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The Journal of Private and Economic Law (ISSN 2797-8702) is a refereed journal published by the Private Law Department, Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia. The Editorial Board ensures that all papers published in this journal were under a double-blind peer review. Articles submitted to this journal should cover contemporary issues of private and economic law, under doctrinal, comparative, and socio-legal approaches. Manuscript submissions should be between 6,000-10,000 words in length, although shorter papers relating to the policy with international and comparative perspectives will be considered. The peer-review process and decision on publication will be normally completed within 60 days of receipt of submissions. Please see our Instructions for Authors for information on manuscript submissions.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2 No 1 (2022): May 2022" : 5 Documents clear
Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Konsumen Yang Dirugikan Atas Pembelian Masker Kain Kesehatan Yang Tidak Ber-Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI) Finda Romadhona
Journal of Private and Economic Law Vol 2 No 1 (2022): May 2022
Publisher : Private Law Department, Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (387.276 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/jpel.v2i1.28905

Abstract

The overall policy on the use of masks has been the subject of extensive debate since the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Insufficient supply of surgical masks has forced the public and the government to allow the use of cloth masks. With the stipulation of SNI 8914:2020 regulations, the quality requirements for masks made of woven fabrics and/or knitted fabrics from various types of fiber, consist of at least 2 (two) layers of fabric and can be washed several times (washable). Business actors who trade cloth masks that do not comply with the rules that have been set so that this causes harm to consumers. In order to realize the rights of consumers who have been harmed, legal protection is needed for these consumers in accordance with Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The research method used is normative or doctrinal research, which is a type of research that focuses on examining the application of rules or norms in positive law. The results of the study conclude that if there are consumers who buy and use cloth masks that do not have the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) then business actors are obliged to provide accountability. Accountability given by business actors to the products produced must be in accordance with the principle of product responsibility which is known in the legal world, especially business. The responsibility is carried out because it has violated the rights of consumers as described in Article 4 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection letter a "the right to comfort, security, and safety in consuming goods and/or services".
Perjanjian Wakaf Uang Pada Bank Muamalat Kantor Cabang Malang Ahmad Faathir
Journal of Private and Economic Law Vol 2 No 1 (2022): May 2022
Publisher : Private Law Department, Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (332.616 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/jpel.v2i1.28129

Abstract

Abstrak Pemusatan terhadap pengumpulan dana wakaf uang yang tidak merata hanya pada Badan Wakaf Indonesia yang berlokasi di Jakarta. Salah satu faktor yang dapat membuat ketertarikan seseorang dalam melaksanakan wakaf uang adalah berbagai bentuk perjanjian dan efektifitas pelaksanaan yang ada pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah Penerima Wakaf Uang (LKS-PWU), dalam penelitian ini adalah Bank Muamalat Kantor Cabang Malang yang sudah menerima wakaf uang sejak tahun 2008. Dalam rangka mencapai maksud dan tujuan penelitian ini, teori yang dipakai adalah teori hukum wakaf, teori hukum perdata, dan teori efektifitas hukum. Pendekatan yang dilaksankan adalah pendekatan yuridis sosiologis melalui wawancara. Hasil penelitian sebagai berikut, pelaksanaan wakaf uang pada dasarnya terdapat dua macam, yaitu secara langsung dan secara tidak langsung. Perjanjian akad yang dilangsungakan adalah dalam jangka waktu selamanya atau dalam jangka waktu tertentu. Pada Bank Muamalat sendiri hanya melaksankan proses wakaf uang secara langsung saja karena belum memiliki sistem penunjang berbasis internet atau software. Pernyataan kehendak wakif yang harus di tuliskan dalam proses perjanjiannya tidak dilampirkan. Pelaksanaan pada proses perjanjian wakaf uang pada Bank Muamalat dapat dikatakan tidak efektif. Melihat belum tercapainya pemenuhan terhadap pelaksanaan proses perjanjian oleh para penegak hukum yang menguasai bidang wakaf uang ini. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan tidak adanya pernyataan kehendak wakif yang dilampirkan pada saat pelaksanaan perjanjian wakaf uang berlangsung. serta fasilitas dan saran yang belum dapat dikatakan terpenuhi. Tidak dapatnya Bank Muamalat memenuhi kewajibanya dalam penyediaan sistem berbasis internet atau software, dikarenakan masih dalam proses pengembangan dalam hal-hal yang diprioritakan yang lebih sering digunakan oleh nasabah. Seharusnya sistem inipun harus dikembangkan secara bersamaan mengingat hal ini adalah suatu kewajiban demi meningkatkan kinerja penerimaan wakaf uang.
Perlindungan Hukum Pencipta Lagu Aisyah Asal Malaysia Atas Tindakan Strike Konten Youtube Oleh Musisi Indonesia Nonny Relinda Elok Paraswari
Journal of Private and Economic Law Vol 2 No 1 (2022): May 2022
Publisher : Private Law Department, Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (302.998 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/jpel.v2i1.25501

Abstract

ABSTRACT: in its development, the existence of cases in the field of copyright does not only involve creators in one country only, but also involves creators from other countries, such as the case that recently occurred, namely the case between songwriter Aisyah a Malaysian named Angah Razif with an Indonesian musician named Harlin Pasili Ansori. This case began when an Indonesian musician named Harlin Pasili Ansori claimed that Aisyah’s song was composed by Angah Razif which was sung by Projector Band plagiarized the melody of his song entitled Half Trip to Bait Al Hamid. Harlin submitted a strike report for the content of Aisyah’s song to the youtube side, as a result of the report, the youtube took a strike to the content of the song Aisyah created by Angah Razif presented by Projector Band, so the content of Aisyah’s song is lost from the official channel Projector Band. From the claims made by Harlin giving the impact of loss to Angah as the creator of Aisyah’s song that is materially and immaterially. In international treaties, to be exact, Berne Convention has guaranteed the rights owned by an creator. Protection of a creation is provided by the Berne Convention and also the laws of each participating country. In other words, every country participants are obliged to provide protection to the creation of all citizens countries from all participating countries that are participants in the Berne Convention. Where the protection of the creation will be further regulated by: the law of the country of origin of the creator or the law of the country of place claimed protection. In this article, we will explain more about protection the law against the songwriter Aisyah from Malaysia with reference to Indonesian state laws and regulations, because in this case the perpetrators of copyright infringement are indonesian citizens. The type of research that used is by using normative juridical. Keywords: Legal Protection, Creator, Youtube Content Strike ABSTRACT: in its development, the existence of cases in the field of copyright does not only involve creators in one country only, but also involves creators from other countries, such as the case that recently occurred, namely the case between songwriter Aisyah a Malaysian named Angah Razif with an Indonesian musician named Harlin Pasili Ansori. This case began when an Indonesian musician named Harlin Pasili Ansori claimed that Aisyah’s song was composed by Angah Razif which was sung by Projector Band plagiarized the melody of his song entitled Half Trip to Bait Al Hamid. Harlin submitted a strike report for the content of Aisyah’s song to the youtube side, as a result of the report, the youtube took a strike to the content of the song Aisyah created by Angah Razif presented by Projector Band, so the content of Aisyah’s song is lost from the official channel Projector Band. From the claims made by Harlin giving the impact of loss to Angah as the creator of Aisyah’s song that is materially and immaterially. In international treaties, to be exact, Berne Convention has guaranteed the rights owned by an creator. Protection of a creation is provided by the Berne Convention and also the laws of each participating country. In other words, every country participants are obliged to provide protection to the creation of all citizens countries from all participating countries that are participants in the Berne Convention. Where the protection of the creation will be further regulated by: the law of the country of origin of the creator or the law of the country of place claimed protection. In this article, we will explain more about protection the law against the songwriter Aisyah from Malaysia with reference to Indonesian state laws and regulations, because in this case the perpetrators of copyright infringement are indonesian citizens. The type of research that used is by using normative juridical. Keywords: Legal Protection, Creator, Youtube Content Strike
Dugaan Pelanggaran Integrasi Vertikal dalam Bisnis Digital oleh Penyedia Jasa Transportasi Online di Indonesia (Studi Putusan KPPU Nomor 13/KPPU-I/2019) Ananda Nurul Hidayah
Journal of Private and Economic Law Vol 2 No 1 (2022): May 2022
Publisher : Private Law Department, Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (340.952 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/jpel.v2i1.25043

Abstract

Article 14 of The Law Number 5 of 1999 highlights vertical integration as a prohibited form of agreement. One of the alleged cases of vertical integration practices is in The Case Number 13/KPPU-I/2019 involving PT GRAB Teknologi Indonesia (GRAB) and PT Teknologi Pengangkutan Indonesia (TPI), GRAB is suspected of giving privileges and priorities to TPI. This case is predicted to affect the regulation of the digital economy in the future, including investment in the digital economy sector. This study concludes: First, the Investigator stated that the agreement between GRAB and TPI led to vertical integration and discrimination due to actions taken in the form of giving special treatment that harmed other GRAB Partners who were competitors of TPI. Second, the legal consequences of violating the provisions of Article 14 of The Law Number 5 of 1999 for Business Actors are subject to sanctions in the form of Administrative Measures, Basic Criminal Sanctions, and Additional Criminal Sanctions. Meanwhile, according to Article 118 of The Law Number 11 of 2020, the sanction given to business actors who are proven to have carried out vertical integration is the imposition of Administrative Measures. Third, two of the legal reasons in Case Number 13/KPPU-I/2019 are not in accordance with the applicable legal provisions is Article 14 and Article 19 (D). But apart from that, the legal reasons in Article 15 (2) has complied with the provisions of the Anti-Monopoly Law. The business action taken by GRAB and TPI is a form of business strategy that has legal, socio-economic, technical considerations and other acceptable reasons. In addition, the agreement does not interfere with business competition because it still shows fair business competition.
The sovereignty of blockchain dispute resolution Nima Norouzi
Journal of Private and Economic Law Vol 2 No 1 (2022): May 2022
Publisher : Private Law Department, Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (307.449 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/jpel.v2i1.26665

Abstract

Blockchain technology acts as the infrastructure for self-executing smart contracts. However, because contracts are flawed, and some parties are opportunistic, these new contract options have created challenges in resolving disputes. For example, will smart contracts be recognized and any disputes (in this regard) resolved in existing courts in the jurisdiction? In this article, we first outline some organizational governance options (e.g., mediation, private arbitration, courts) to create a boundary of possibility (option) of resolving disputes for the parties. Second, we provide case studies of emerging blockchain-based mechanisms for resolving dispute resolution challenges. Blockchain-based smart contracts may create dispute resolution problems and act as a technology for entrepreneurs to create new mechanisms for resolving disputes, including those arising from traditional legal contracts. The parties to the contract will inherently choose their most effective governance mechanism for resolving disputes and will change the costs of resolving disputes over time through a process of institutional innovation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3 No 2 (2023): November 2023 Vol 3 No 1 (2023): May 2023 Vol 2 No 2 (2022): November 2022 Vol 2 No 1 (2022): May 2022 Vol 1 No 2 (2021): November 2021 Vol 1 No 1 (2021): May 2021