cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Akbar Sanjaya
Contact Email
jhmj.fh@unsur.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jmj.fh.unsur@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Kabupaten Cianjur, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Location
Kab. cianjur,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia
Published by Universitas Suryakancana
ISSN : 24775681     EISSN : 25800906     DOI : https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia adalah Jurnal Ilmiah berkala yang merupakan jurnal peer-reviewed yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana. JHMJ: Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia terbit pertama Vol. 1, No. 2, 2015, dengan jadwal publikasi jurnal dua kali setahun pada bulan Juni dan Desember. Memiliki visi menjadi Jurnal Ilmiah terdepan dalam Menyebarluaskan dan Mengembangkan hasil pemikiran hukum. Menerima makalah penelitian, review baik dalam bahasa Indonesia maupun bahasa Inggris. Reviewer akan meninjau setiap makalah yang dikirimkan. Proses peninjauan menggunakan tinjauan double-blind, yang berarti bahwa identitas pengulas dan penulis disembunyikan dari pengulas, dan sebaliknya. Ruang lingkup masalah ilmu hukum yang menitikberatkan pada: 1. Hukum Pidana 2. Hukum Perdata 3. Hukum Tata Negara/Hukum Administrasi
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 2 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 2 (2015): Published 30 Desember 2015" : 2 Documents clear
PENGHAPUSAN REMISI BAGI KORUPTOR DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 1995 TENTANG PEMASYARAKATAN
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Vol 1, No 2 (2015): Published 30 Desember 2015
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jhmj.v1i2.40

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia has been categorized as an extraordinary crime (extraordinary crime) for devastating, not only the country's financial and economic potential of the country, but also has destroyed the pillars of socio-cultural, moral, political and legal order or national security. With the incredible title, then appeared the discourse for the removal of remission for corruption, so it is then reap the pro and contra among the people.As for the identification of the problem in writing this article the author limit as to whether the abolition of remissions for the corruptors is in conformity with the existing laws, or actually even contrary to human rights. The method used in this study using normative juridical approach, the research done by basing on literature data or secondary data. Based on these results, that the abolition of remission to criminals is not in accordance with the rules of the applicable legislation, especially Regulation No. 12 Year 1995 on Corrections, particularly clause 14 subsection (1) points i, which states that "Prisoners are entitled to a reduction in criminal past (remission)". Therefore, if the Government intends to provide a more powerful deterrent effect against criminal act of corruption, then the Government should first rule synergize legislation governing the granting remission to prisoners, so there is no overlapping policies.Keywords: Corruption, Remission, Objective Punishment.
KENDALA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN MELALUI BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK)
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Vol 1, No 2 (2015): Published 30 Desember 2015
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jhmj.v1i2.41

Abstract

Empowering costumers is a form of awareness on the specific characteristics in the world of costumers, the different interest among different parties which have various bargaining positions, has been given space in the field of costumer dispute settlement which is a good policy in empowering costumers. A special institution which has been appointed to resolve costumer disputes is the Costumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK). Costumer Dispute Settlement Agency is an independent agency or institute, a public agency which has the duty and authority such as implementing the handling and settlement of disputes between costumers and businessmen. Based on the duties and authorities of BPSK, the costumer dispute settlement mechanisms should be registered to the nearest BPSK. The examination based on the request of the costumer is done just like proceedings in the General Court and the decision made by BPSK is final. However, during the implementation of their duties in settling costumer disputes, BPSK is facing some obstacles such as lack of technical guidance in regulating aspects related to procedural law, constrained by the human resources of BPSK members, the lack of understanding and awareness of costumers and also constrained by operating costs. Therefore, the improvement of the structure and legal culture needs to be done by socializing the costumer protection law to the public.Keywords : Costumer Dispute, Costumer Dispute Settlement Agency, Costumer Protection.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2

 1 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 9, No 1 (2023): Vol 9, No 1 (2023): Published 30 Juni 2023 Vol 8, No 2 (2022): Vol 8, No 2 (2022): Published 30 Desember 2022 Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Published 30 Juni 2022 Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Published 30 Desember 2021 Vol 7, No 1 (2021): Vol 7, No 1 (2021): Published 30 Juni 2021 Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Published 30 Desember 2020 Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Published 30 Juni 2020 Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Published 30 Desember 2019 Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Published 30 Juni 2019 Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Published 31 Desember 2018 Vol 4, No 1 (2018): Published 30 Juni 2018 Vol 3, No 2 (2017): Published 30 Desember 2017 Vol 3, No 1 (2017): Published 27 Juni 2017 Vol 2, No 2 (2016): Published 30 Desember 2016 Vol 2, No 1 (2016): Published 20 Juni 2016 Vol 1, No 2 (2015): Published 30 Desember 2015 More Issue