cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agus Budianto
Contact Email
agus.budianto@uph.edu
Phone
+622125535168
Journal Mail Official
lexprospiciteditor@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Kampus Pascasarjana Universitas Pelita Harapan Plaza Semanggi lt. 16, Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 50, RT.1/RW.4, Karet Semanggi, Kecamatan Setiabudi, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12930
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Lex Prospicit
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 29881781     EISSN : 29881773     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Lex Prospicit is a scientific journal published by the Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan in collaboration with Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia (AAI) and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. The articles published in this journal cover a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Health Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law, Banking Law, Cyber Law, Bankruptcy Law, WTO Law, Investment Law, Tax Law, Human Rights Law, ADR and Arbitration Law, and Labor Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 1: February 2023" : 5 Documents clear
DOUBLE PUNISHMENT IN THE WAITING TIME FOR DEATH PENALTY: A STUDY OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION IN INDONESIA Sahat Marulitua Sidabukke
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6634

Abstract

In Indonesia, until 2022 there were 428 people who have been sentenced with death penalty by anaesthetics and were still waiting for their execution to be carried out. Among those people, 101 have been sitting in the death row for more than 10 years. This means that those who are sentenced to death by the court (inkracht van gewijsde) were imprisoned for life until their execution. They had to carry out two kinds of punishments, videlicet death penalty and imprisonment. There is a lengthy waiting time, which results in the neglect of death row convicts' rights. This is a normative juridical research with data collected through literature study, court decision analysis, and concept test in focus group discussion attended by Supreme Prosecutor, Supreme Court, National Narcotics Agency, State Police of Republic of Indonesia and National Commission of Human Rights. The result of this research shows that such waiting period creates distrust between judicial institutions. It also creates uncertainty and becomes a loophole for death row inmates to apply for unlimited legal remedies which causes delay of the execution of the death penalty. On the other hand, the role of the Public Prosecutor as the executioner of death penalty is not yet optimal. Because of the two reasons above (legal remedies and political will), they worry about potentially being considered as violating human rights. 
REPOSISI KEDUDUKAN DAN KEWENANGAN PENYIDIK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PPNS) DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA [REPOSITION OF POSITION AND AUTHORITY OF PPNS IN THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM] Oloan C. H. Marpaung
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6635

Abstract

PPNS in its position and authority as the embodiment of law enforcement, it can be seen that there is subordination of other law enforcement sub-systems. The purpose of this paper is to reposition the position and authority of the PPNS in the Criminal Justice System so they are not seen as subordinate and placed as assistants to Police Investigators. The formulation of the problem in this study are the position and authority of PPNS in the Indonesian criminal justice system and legal certainty about the position and authority of PPNS in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This research is a normative-empirical research conducted by analyzing the implementation of normative legal provisions (laws) with a case study approach, then in analyzing the data using a deductive method, namely drawing conclusions from a problem faced that is specific. The results of this study are that the existence of PPNS is very much needed in conducting investigations due to the complexity of the investigation, the existence of special crimes, and the limitations of Polri investigators. Regarding the implementation of the duties of civil servants so that there is no overlap between Polri investigators and PPNS, the government has set various regulations regarding the mechanism for the appointment and dismissal of PPNS, as well as the implementation of coordination and supervision carried out by Polri investigators against PPNS.Bahasa Abstrak Indonesia: PPNS dalam kedudukan maupun kewenangannya sebagai perwujudan dari penegak hukum, dapat diketahui terjadinya sub-ordinasi atas sub-sistem penegak hukum yang lain. Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah menempatkan kembali (reposisi) kedudukan dan kewenangan PPNS dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana sehingga tidak terlihat sebagai subordinasi dan ditempatkan sebagai pembantu Penyidik Kepolisian. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian mengangkat hal kedudukan dan kewenangan PPNS dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia dan kepastian hukum terhadap kedudukan dan kewenangan PPNS dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian Normatif-Empiris yang dilakukan dengan menganalisis implementasi ketentuan hukum normatif (undang-undang) dengan pendekatan Pendekatan terhadap kasus hukum (case study), kemudian dalam penganalisian data menggunakan metode deduktif, yakni menarik kesimpulan dari suatu permasalahan yang dihadapi yang bersifat khusus.Hasil penelitian ini adalah keberadaan PPNS sangat dibutuhkan dalam melakukan penyidikan dikarenakan kompleksnya penyidikan, adanya tindak pidana yang bersifat khusus, dan keterbatasan dari Penyidik Polri. Terkait pelaksanaan tugas PNS agar harmonis dan tidak terjadi tumpang tindih antara Penyidik Polri dan PPNS, pemerintah telah menetapkan berbagai peraturan mengenai mekanisme pengangkatan dan pemberhentian PPNS, serta pelaksanaan koordinasi dan pengawasan yang dilakukan Penyidik Polri terhadap PPNS.
IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PERDAGANGAN DI INDONESIA PADA SAAT TERJADINYA KOMPETISI DAGANG AMERIKA DENGAN CHINA [IMPLEMENTATION OF TRADE LAW POLICY IN INDONESIA AT THE TIME OF THE OCCURRENCE OF TRADE COMPETITION BETWEEN AMERICA AND CHINA] M. Rusdyanto Hadawang
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6671

Abstract

This research examines the policies issued by the Government of Indonesia, especially in trade law policies at the time of trade wars or trade competition between America and China. This study uses a type of normative research through a legal history approach, a conceptual approach, an approach to legal principles, and a legal political approach in order to achieve the research objectives, namely to present legal facts and examine the impact of trade competition between America and China on Indonesia in the field of trade law at the time of the occurrence of trade competition between America and China with conformity to the principles stipulated in Article 2 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. The results of the study show that the impact that is felt by Indonesia is illustrated in the presentation of data on Indonesia's fluctuating export-import activities and also exposure regarding regulations and policies resulting from negotiations between countries as stipulated in international trade agreements that have been ratified and applied to the people of Indonesia. The resulting conclusion is that due to trade competition between America and China, Indonesia has issued regulatory changes related to export-import activities and also provisions in the defense industry which regulate the involvement of the private sector in the manufacture of defense equipment, through changes in Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation and Law Number 16 of 2012 concerning the Defense Industry. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang kebijakan yang dikeluarkan oleh Pemerintah Indonesia khususnya dalam kebijakan hukum perdagangan pada saat terjadinya perang dagang atau kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif melalui pendekatan sejarah hukum, pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan asas-asas hukum, serta pendekatan politik hukum guna mencapai tujuan penelitian yaitu untuk menyajikan fakta hukum dan mengkaji dampak kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China terhadap Indonesia di bidang hukum perdagangan pada saat terjadinya kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China dengan kesesuaian asas-asas yang diatur dalam Pasal 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dampak yang dirasakan Indonesia, tergambarkan dalam sajian data tentang kegiatan ekspor impor Indonesia yang fluktuatif dan juga pemaparan terkait regulasi dan kebijakan hasil perundingan antar negara yang dituang dalam perjanjian perdagangan internasional yang telah diratifikasi dan diberlakukan kepada masyarakat Indonesia. Kesimpulan yang dihasilkan bahwa dampak kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China, Indonesia telah mengeluarkan perubahan regulasi terkait dengan kegiatan ekspor impor dan juga ketentuan dalam industri pertahanan yang mengatur keterlibatan pihak swasta dalam pembuatan alutsista, melalui perubahan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2012 tentang Industri Pertahanan.
PERSYARATAN E-COMMERCE MERUGIKAN KONSUMEN PADA TRANSAKSI BARANG ELEKTRONIK DI MARKETPLACE [E-COMMERCE REQUIREMENTS HARMING CONSUMERS IN ELECTRONIC GOODS TRANSACTIONS IN THE MARKETPLACE] Widya Fitri Adilia
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6680

Abstract

Issues related to consumer rights are often neglected in the era of digital technology and the laws and regulations of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection are felt to be increasingly irrelevant. Many are still found in e-commerce transactions through marketplaces, which ignore consumer rights through digital requirements made unilaterally by business actors. This writing is focused on the purchase of electronic goods by consumers in e-commerce transactions through marketplaces, so that a formulation of the problem is compiled about how the forms of e-commerce requirements are burdensome and detrimental to consumers in electronic goods transactions in the marketplace, and how are consumers' efforts to obtain rights to goods electronics purchased in the marketplace when viewed from a review of Indonesian law. The writing methodology is carried out by using empirical normative research to assist in solving problems in the field of consumer protection law and assisting in the discovery of ideas for the development of legal science in providing protection for consumer rights in the digital technology era. E-commerce requirements that are burdensome and detrimental to consumers in electronic goods transactions in the marketplace are in the form of standard clauses in which there are still many provisions that violate the contents of Article 18 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Efforts by consumers to obtain rights to electronic goods purchased in the marketplace within existing regulatory provisions, that law in Indonesia still does not have specific standard requirements, and a form of supervision to take firm action against marketplace business actors who violate the provisions prohibiting the standard clauses included in the requirements e-commerce transactions.  Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Permasalahan terkait hak konsumen yang sering terabaikan di era teknologi digital, peraturan perundang-undangan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dirasa sudah semakin kurang relevan. Masih banyak ditemukan dalam transaksi e-commerce melalui marketplace, yang mengabaikan hak-hak konsumen melalui persyaratan digital yang dibuat sepihak oleh pelaku usaha. Penulisan ini difokuskan pada pembelian barang elektronik oleh konsumen dalam transasksi e-commerce melalui marketplace, sehingga disusun sebuah rumusan masalah tentang bagaimanakah bentuk persyaratan e-commerce yang memberatkan dan merugikan konsumen pada transaksi barang elektronik di marketplace, serta bagaimana upaya konsumen untuk mendapatkan hak atas barang elektronik yang dibeli di marketplace bila dilihat dari tinjauan hukum Indonesia. Metodologi penulisan dilakukan dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif empiris guna membantu dalam memecahan persoalan di bidang hukum perlindungan konsumen dan membantu penemuan gagasan pengembangan ilmu hukum dalam memberikan perlindungan hak konsumen di era teknologi digital. Persyaratan e-commerce yang memberatkan dan merugikan konsumen pada transaksi barang elektronik di marketplace ialah berupa klausula baku yang isinya masih banyak ditemukan ketentuan yang melanggar isi Pasal 18 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Upaya konsumen untuk mendapatkan hak atas barang elektronik yang dibeli di marketplace dalam ketentuan regulasi yang ada, bahwa hukum di Indonesia masih belum memiliki standar persyaratan khusus, dan bentuk pengawasan untuk menindak tegas para pelaku usaha marketplace yang melanggar ketentuan larangan klausula baku yang dicantumkan di dalam persyaratan transaksi e-commerce.
REGULATION FOR E-COMMERCE PLATFORM PROVIDERS IN INDONESIA: IMPORTANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS Jemy Vestius Confido
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6703

Abstract

Indonesia is a country with the largest digital economy potential in Southeast Asia as indicated by number of its internet user especially through mobile access. This huge potential begins to realize with the presence of electronic commerce (e-Commerce) services which grow very fast and very vastly. The presence of e-Commerce has stimulated many new social phenomena, which are mainly triggered by e-Commerce platform providers who intensively perform marketing activities. This situation will become the real law (das sein) if it is not governed by law.The purpose of this research is to analyze the importance and effectiveness of existing regulations regarding e-Commerce platform providers in Indonesia. The research applies normative juridical method that uses applicable laws and regulations relevant to the issues as the primary sources supported by empirical cases as the secondary sources. From theoretical perspective, responsive law theory and the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali are applied in this research. The applied positive laws must be assured for their responsiveness toward social needs while the specific characteristics of e-Commerce are entirely considered. Legal comparisons with international laws and other countries are also included to enrich the analysis.The research concludes that the Government Regulation Number 80 of year 2019 regarding Trading through Electronic System is very important to regulate e-Commerce environment in Indonesia. However, the enforcement of this regulation is not fully effective. The government of Indonesia could apply the regulation to facilitate healthy e-Commerce growth with comprehension towards business perspective and building trust to stimulate expected responses. Effective implementation of comprehensive e-Commerce regulation will strengthen the nation’s digital economy and overall economic resilience. Specific legal arrangements for e-Commerce platform providers should not paralyze the business. Instead, more persuasive approaches with good communication and trust will stimulate positive benefits to all related parties.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Indonesia merupakan negara dengan potensi ekonomi digital terbesar di Asia Tenggara sebagaimana diindikasikan oleh jumlah pengguna internet khususnya yang menggunakan akses seluler. Potensi yang besar ini mulai terwujud menjadi nyata dengan kehadiran layanan perdagangan elektronik atau e-Commerce yang tumbuh secara cepat dan besar. Kehadiran e-Commerce telah memicu fenomena-fenomena sosial yang utamanya didorong oleh penyedia layanan platform e-Commerce yang secara intensif melakukan aktivitas pemasaran. Situasi ini akan menjadi hukum yang digunakan (das sein) jika tidak ditata oleh regulasi hukum.Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa pentingnya dan keefektifan dari regulasi yang sudah ada mengenai penyedia platform e-Commerce di Indonesia.  Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang bertumpu kepada hukum dan regulasi yang diberlakukan sesuai dengan isu tersebut sebagai sumber utama dengan didukung kasus-kasus empiris sebagai sumber pelengkap. Dari sudut pandang teoritis, teori hukum responsif dan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali digunakan sebagai alat analisis dalam penelitian ini. Hukum positif yang diberlakukan harus dipastikan  bersifat responsif terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat sedangkan karakteristik khusus dari e-Commerce harus seluruhnya dipertimbangkan. Perbandingan dengan hukum international dan negara-negara lain juga digunakan untuk memperkaya analisis.Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik sangatlah penting untuk mengatur lingkungan e-Commerce di Indonesia. Namun demikian, penegakan dari peraturan ini tidak sepenuhnya efektif. Pemerintah Indonesia bisa menerapkan peraturan ini untuk memfasilitasi pertumbuhan e-Commerce yang sehat dengan pemahaman terhadap perspektif bisnis dan pembentukan kepercayaan untuk merangsang response yang diharapkan. Implementasi yang efektif dari peraturan e-Commerce yang komprehensif akan memperkuat ekonomi digital dan keseluruhan daya tahan ekonomi nasional. Pengaturan khusus terhadap penyedia platform e-Commerce seyogyanya tidak melumpuhkan bisnis. Sebaliknya, pendekatan yang lebih persuasif dengan komunikasi yang baik dan kepercayaan akan mendorong manfaat positif baik semua pihak terkait.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025 Vol. 3 No. 1: February 2025 Vol. 2 No. 2: July 2024 Vol 2, No 1: February 2024 Vol. 2 No. 1: February 2024 Vol. 1 No. 2: July 2023 Vol 1, No 2: July 2023 Vol 1, No 1: February 2023 Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023