cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rena Yulia
Contact Email
renayulia@untirta.ac.id
Phone
+62817226339
Journal Mail Official
victimjov@untirta.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Jl. Raya Palka KM. 03 Sindangsari Pabuaran Kab. Serang
Location
Kab. serang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology
Published by Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
ISSN : 30261953     EISSN : 30261627     DOI : https://doi.org/10.51825/sajv.v1i2
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology adalah jurnal peer-review double-blind yang didedikasikan untuk eksplorasi dan kemajuan viktimologi dalam konteks Asia Tenggara yang beragam dan dinamis. Jurnal kami menyediakan platform bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi untuk terlibat dalam berbagai aspek viktimologi, dengan penekanan khusus pada kawasan Asia Tenggara. Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology berkomitmen untuk mempromosikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam mengenai isu-isu viktimisasi di Asia Tenggara dan memfasilitasi kolaborasi di antara para akademisi, pembuat kebijakan, dan praktisi yang berdedikasi pada penelitian dan dukungan yang berpusat pada korban. Kami mengundang para peneliti untuk berkontribusi terhadap kemajuan pengetahuan dan hak-hak korban di wilayah yang beragam dan terus berkembang ini. Penulis diundang untuk mengirimkan artikel penelitian asli, tinjauan literatur, studi kasus, dan kontribusi teoretis yang selaras dengan fokus dan ruang lingkup jurnal. Jurnal ini mempertahankan standar akademik yang tinggi dan menyambut perspektif interdisipliner dalam bidang viktimologi.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 1 (2023)" : 5 Documents clear
Implementation of the Witness and Victim Protection Agency in Providing Protection to Victims of Vigilantes (Eigenrichting) Fadilah, Nurul
Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Vol 1, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sajv.v1i1.24685

Abstract

In Indonesia, witness and victim protection institutions (LPSK) need to be discussed in term of the implementation and its protection to vigilante’s victim. The normative law and secondary data are used to conduct this research. It can be seen that LPSK does not give the protection right yet to vigilante’s victim. It is caused by the victim does not apply for the protection right through the form as a mandatory. This situation leads ineffectiveness of the protection right to the vigilante’s victim from LPSK since some of the victim not ready to report or take an action after the crime occurred. Indeed, medical and psychological rehabilitation need to be fulfilled for the recovery because the victim mostly suffered physically and mentally due to the persecution. Even though the main victim passed away, but the family still have the right like restitution from the offender since qualified as secondary victim.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Anak Korban Pelecehan Seksual Yang Melakukan Pembunuhan dalam Perspektif Kriminologi Irawan, Benny; Samallo, Caroline Estava
Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Vol 1, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sajv.v1i1.24681

Abstract

The world of children is not always synonymous with playing. Sometimes children fall into criminal acts that make them face or conflict with the law. The crime of murder is committed by adults and can also be achieved by minors. One of the cases of this crime of murder occurred in Sawah Besar, Central Jakarta, where the perpetrators were minors and the child was also a victim of sexual harassment from the case different. This murder case is the first case in Indonesia, where the perpetrators of this murder are minors. Based on this, a problem arises: what factors cause the murder of children who are victims of sexual abuse from a criminological perspective? And what is the criminal responsibility for children who are perpetrators of murder who are victims of sexual abuse?. The framework of thought in this research is Psychological Theory and Criminal Liability Theory. This study uses a normative juridical method by examining legal library materials or secondary data, namely data that refers to legal norms, in-laws and regulations, legal theories, and court decisions that are then analyzed qualitatively. The research specifications in this study are descriptive analysis. This study concludes that the factor in the occurrence of the crime of murder committed by child victims of sexual abuse in a criminological perspective is because the ego aspect is more inclined to the id aspect and the superego aspect is weak and unable to balance the mind in overcoming inner conflict due to traumatic fear so that the superego aspect is not able to be a balancer in tackling internal disputes so that the occurrence of the crime of murder and in this case NF can be held criminally responsible with strict liability, seen from the actions of the defendant, namely violence against children that resulted in death, therefore the basis for making decisions by the judge that the defendant must be responsible for his actions by executing a sentence of imprisonment for two years. Suggestions for the government to conduct socialization to the community regarding the prevention of formal sexual harassment to apply it in the family environment to focus more on providing supervision and love to minimize deviations committed by children.
Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Sebagai Leader Sector dalam Memenuhi Hak Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia Kurnia, Rizky
Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Vol 1, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sajv.v1i1.24682

Abstract

Criminal acts of terrorism cause material and immaterial losses. Victims of criminal acts of terrorism need protection and restoration of their rights, therefore Indonesia has an institution authorized to protect witnesses and/or victims so that the protection and restoration of the rights of victims, one of which is the rights of victims of criminal acts of terrorism, can be fulfilled. The problems studied in this study are regarding the implementation of witness and victim protection institutions (LPSK) in fulfilling the rights of victims of criminal acts of terrorism in the Indonesian criminal justice system, and regarding mechanisms for fulfilling the rights of victims of criminal acts of terrorism. This research was conducted using normative juridical methods. The research approach uses a statutory approach. The data source used in this study is a secondary data source which is then analyzed qualitatively. The LPSK mechanism in fulfilling the rights of victims of criminal acts of terrorism is inseparable from the role of the victim who must play an active role in submitting a request to the head of the LPSK. The application can be submitted by the victim, his family or his attorney.
Penerapan Mekanisme Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) di Lembaga Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia dalam Upaya Pemulihan Hak Korban Tindak Pidana dalam Perspektif Viktimologi Postmodern Khairuummah, Rosdayana
Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Vol 1, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sajv.v1i1.24683

Abstract

In criminal law, it recognizes retributive justice and restorative justice which over time law enforcement in Indonesia experiences supremacy in the judicial process where law enforcement officials are expected to be able to realize the supremacy of law enforcement through restorative justice which in the process of settling cases is carried out outside the court by involving victims, perpetrators as well as other stakeholders who are interconnected with each other in determining the process of running a restorative justice mechanism by taking into account the main interest, namely the fulfillment of victims' rights. The mechanism for the supremacy of law enforcement through restorative justice has been carried out by the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia based on the Attorney General's Regulation (PERJA) Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution based on Restorative Justice. The implementation of the supremacy of law enforcement carried out by the Prosecutor's Office through restorative justice is a representative form of postmodern victimology theory which focuses on protecting the law from crime victims with the aim of recovering parties in conflict which are carried out informally.
Quo Vadis Implementasi Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi dan Hak Kompensasi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Bismillahi, Abda Oe
Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Vol 1, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sajv.v1i1.24684

Abstract

The legal position of victims of crime is not recognized in the criminal justice system. Including the right to obtain compensation through the criminal justice system. Because the issue of compensation is a matter of the individual victim and this problem becomes the scope of civil law. This research wants to examine the technical settlement of fulfilling the right of restitution and compensation rights to victims of criminal acts based on the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2022 concerning Procedures for Requesting and Granting Restitution and Compensation to Victims of Crime, so that fulfillment of victims' rights can be realized through the criminal justice system. The approach method used in this research is normative legal research method. Normative legal research places law as a building system of norms. The results of the study show that Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2022 is a practical policy that includes adjustments to laws and regulations, government decisions, judge decisions, the legal system and legal principles with the aim of increasing legal unity, legal certainty, justice (justice, gerechtigheid) and comparability (equit, billijkeid) thereby providing a new position for victims in the criminal justice system.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3, No 1 (2025) Vol 2, No 2 (2024) Vol 2, No 1 (2024) Vol 1, No 2 (2023) Vol 1, No 1 (2023)