cover
Contact Name
RUDI SALAM
Contact Email
pinisi.pjss21@gmail.com
Phone
+6285211842168
Journal Mail Official
pinisi.pjss21@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Raya Pendidikan Kampus UNM Gunungsari Baru Makassar
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Pinisi Journal of Social Science
ISSN : 28302494     EISSN : 28299256     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Pinisi Journal of Social Science. Published by the peer review process and open access with p-ISSN: 2830-2494 and e-ISSN: 2829-9256. Pinisi Journal of Social Science. Intended as a media of information and arena of philosophical, theoretical, methodological debates related to social science issues . Pinisi Journal of Social Science: a journal of the results of thought, research, and development in the science of Social Science. invited scientists, activists, and public officials to write issues related to Social Science. Articles can be research or conceptual. Published by Faculty of Social Science and Law. published three times a year on May, September, and January.
Articles 19 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 4, No 2 (2025): September" : 19 Documents clear
FRAGMENTED GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY IN POST-GADDAFI LIBYA: PATHWAYS TOWARD NATIONAL RECONCILIATION NMOR, Emmanuel Ifeakaonye; NDUBUISI, Johnson Okoroafor; CHUKE, Patrick Ikechukwu
Pinisi Journal of Social Science Vol 4, No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pjss.v4i2.74930

Abstract

Since the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, Libya has experienced persistent political instability, institutional fragmentation, and violent conflicts, leading to a severe legitimacy crisis. The absence of a unified central authority has resulted in parallel governments, militia dominance, economic mismanagement, and foreign interference, further complicating national reconciliation efforts. This study examines the fragmented governance and institutional legitimacy crisis in post-Gaddafi Libya while exploring viable pathways toward national reconciliation. It adopts the historical research method, relying on secondary sources such as policy reports, scholarly works, and official documents. Through qualitative content analysis, the study critically evaluates political developments, institutional failures, and reconciliation efforts over time. It highlights key challenges, including the lack of inclusive political dialogue, a fragmented security sector, and uneven economic distribution, which have deepened divisions across the country. The study argues that national reconciliation is only achievable through inclusive political dialogue, security sector reform, economic stabilization, transitional justice, and reduced foreign influence. Establishing a transparent electoral roadmap, integrating militias into a unified national army, ensuring fair oil revenue distribution, and promoting grassroots-level peace-building initiatives are essential for rebuilding Libya’s institutional legitimacy. The study recommends a Libyan-led reconciliation process, supported by regional and international mediation efforts, with a strong focus on justice, security, and governance reforms. By addressing these structural issues, Libya can move toward long-term stability, national unity, and the restoration of public trust in state institutions..Kata kunci: (keyword) fragmented governance, institutional legitimacy, post-Gaddafi Libya, national reconciliation, political instability
Digital Ecosystems and the Paradox of Inclusive Exclusion: Reconceptualizing Business Development Services for Tanzanian MSMEs in the Platform Era Chachage, Bukaza Loth
Pinisi Journal of Social Science Vol 4, No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pjss.v4i2.39184

Abstract

The digitization of Business Development Services (BDS) is championed globally as a solution to scale support for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in emerging economies. In Tanzania, this vision aligns with national strategies and has spurred a proliferation of mobile-based advisory, fintech, and e-commerce platforms. This conceptual paper identifies and theorizes a critical paradox underpinning this digital transition: the phenomenon of inclusive exclusion. While digital BDS platforms ostensibly promote inclusion by broadening access, they simultaneously engineer new, systemic forms of exclusion rooted in asymmetrical data extraction, opaque algorithmic governance, and entrenched platform power. We argue that the prevailing “digital divide” framework is analytically inadequate, as it focuses narrowly on connectivity rather than on the qualitative and power-laden nature of digital inclusion. Synthesizing digital platform theory, the capabilities approach, and critical data studies, we advance a novel Tripartite Framework of Digital BDS Engagement, centered on the interrelated dimensions of Access, Agency, and Algorithms. Through an analysis of Tanzania’s digital BDS ecosystem, including the government’s M-SME Digital Hub, agri-tech services like WeFarm, and fintech lenders such as Tala, we demonstrate how MSMEs are routinely included as data sources and users but excluded from value capture, fair algorithmic treatment, and meaningful control. In response, we propose a Digital BDS Ecosystem Justice Framework built on three core tensions: Automation versus Advisory, Data Extraction versus Empowerment, and Scalability versus Context-Specificity. The paper concludes that transforming digital BDS from a tool of efficient delivery into a platform for genuine entrepreneurial capability development requires embedded participatory governance, robust data sovereignty principles, and a fundamental reorientation from designing for to designing with Tanzanian MSMEs.
The Reliability of the Abstract Aptitude Sub-Scale of the Developed and Validated Aptitude Test for UTME Selection Voke, Eyetan; Ossai, P.A.U
Pinisi Journal of Social Science Vol 4, No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pjss.v4i2.46052

Abstract

The reliability of aptitude tests is critical for ensuring fair and valid selection of candidates for higher education. This study investigated the reliability of the Abstract Aptitude Sub-Scale of a developed and validated aptitude test for UTME selection in Nigeria. Specifically, the study examined both internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the sub-scale. The research adopted a descriptive survey design and involved a sample of 200 senior secondary school students drawn from public and private schools in Delta State using purposive sampling. Data were collected through the 25-item Abstract Aptitude Sub-Scale and analyzed using Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20), Cronbach’s alpha, item-total correlations, and Pearson correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability. Findings revealed that the sub-scale demonstrated high internal consistency, with KR-20 = 0.87 and Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88. Item-total correlations ranged from 0.35 to 0.58, indicating that all items contributed positively to the measurement of abstract reasoning. Additionally, the test–retest reliability was found to be excellent, with Pearson’s r = 0.89 and a low standard error of measurement (SEM = 1.1), demonstrating temporal stability over a two-week interval. These results confirm that the Abstract Aptitude Sub-Scale is a psychometrically sound instrument, capable of consistently and accurately assessing abstract reasoning ability among UTME candidates. The study concludes that the sub-scale is suitable for high-stakes educational assessment and recommends its adoption for national selection purposes, with periodic review to maintain its reliability. Further research is suggested to examine the predictive validity of the sub-scale in relation to academic performance in tertiary institutions.
Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting, an Invisible Pandemic: Examination of The International Legal Framework and Challenges Bekongfe, Pascal Aboh; Iheanacho, Linda Nnebuihe; Aniashie, Akpanke Shishitileugiang
Pinisi Journal of Social Science Vol 4, No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pjss.v4i2.62707

Abstract

Female circumcision is a very controversial subject on the African continent and, apparently, across the globe. Whether you are in Kinshasa or Obudu, Nigeria, there seems to be a spectrum of traditional belief systems that justify female circumcision as a panacea to feminine promiscuity, which still suffers the taboo element despite 21st-century development. In this paper, research shows that female circumcision is still rampant. However, the legal framework set up by the international community has a huge role to play in curbing the pandemic. Nevertheless, is the legal framework robust enough to end the threat to womanhood caused by mutilation of the female principal reproductive organ? We opine that more needs to be done, and we utilize real-life experiences from two African communities (the Odo Community of Bayelsa State and the Kassena Nankana region of Northern Ghana) to cement the findings made herein. Our recommendations are straightforward: entrench the legal framework in local communities through the knowledge economy while seriously prosecuting perpetrators of female circumcision, then seal off the opportunities for continuation of these practices by using local chiefs and rulers to enforce compliance. If FGM must end, then myths must be countered with proper sensitization and lies of promiscuity must be countered with evidence to the contrary.
From Extraction to Partnership: Epistemic Injustice and the Institutionalization of Research Practices in Nigerian Social Science Ogar, Thomas; Aboka, George; Fidelis, Paalee
Pinisi Journal of Social Science Vol 4, No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pjss.v4i2.62743

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive philosophical examination of how epistemic injustice becomes embedded within the institutional architecture of social scientific research, using Nigeria as a paradigmatic case study. Moving beyond Miranda Fricker's foundational framework, we argue that epistemic injustice in postcolonial research contexts operates not merely as interpersonal ethical failure but as systematically reproduced structural violence enabled by what we term “epistemic extraction regimes.” Through detailed analysis of Nigeria's research ecosystem, encompassing ethics review boards, funding mechanisms, methodological protocols, and knowledge dissemination practices, we demonstrate how testimonial and hermeneutical injustices become normalized through institutional procedures that privilege Northern epistemological frameworks while marginalizing indigenous knowledge systems. The paper develops the original concepts of “hermeneutical foreclosure” and “testimonial instrumentalization” to describe how institutional practices actively preclude alternative ways of knowing. Drawing extensively from Nigerian philosophical traditions, including Yoruba epistemology, Igbo metaphysical systems, and contemporary African philosophical discourse, We propose a radical reimagining of social research grounded in what we call “epistemic consociation”, a framework for knowledge production that honors epistemological pluralism while maintaining rigorous scholarly standards. The argument contributes to both social epistemology and philosophy of social science by demonstrating how institutional structures actively constitute, rather than merely mediate, epistemic relations in postcolonial research contexts.
Beyond Oil: Leveraging Community-Based Eco-Tourism for Sustainable Development and Biodiversity Conservation in Nigeria’s Niger Delta Region Eba, Maxwell-Borjor Achuk
Pinisi Journal of Social Science Vol 4, No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pjss.v4i2.46258

Abstract

The Niger Delta region of Nigeria, long synonymous with petroleum extraction and environmental degradation, possesses vast untapped potential for eco-tourism, centered on its unique mangrove ecosystems, rich biodiversity, and cultural heritage. This paper argues that a strategically developed, community-based eco-tourism model can serve as a catalyst for sustainable development, providing an alternative livelihood to mitigate poverty and reduce dependence on extractive industries. Through a mixed-methods approach incorporating stakeholder interviews, geographic surveys, and case study analysis, the research assesses the current state of eco-tourism initiatives in the region, identifies key ecological and cultural assets, and examines the major barriers to development including infrastructure deficits, security concerns, and lack of local capacity. The study concludes by proposing a integrative framework for eco-tourism development that prioritizes community ownership, ecological preservation, and pro-poor economic benefits, thereby contributing to the broader goals of environmental restoration and social stability in the Niger Delta
The contribution of FADAMA III programme to food availability in Cross River, and Akwa Ibom States, Nigeria Ubokuloh, Etim Edet Okon; Iheanacho, Onyendinachi; Inok, Glory Edim
Pinisi Journal of Social Science Vol 4, No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pjss.v4i2.63046

Abstract

This study investigated FADAMA III programme and food security in Akwa Ibom and Cross River States. The population of the study consists of the entire staff and household beneficiaries of FADAMA III programme in Akwa Ibom and Cross River States numbering 8,040. This study applied both stratified and quota sampling techniques. 400 respondents drawn from the staff and household beneficiaries of FADAMA III programme was used as the sample size. 67 respondents were selected from the six senatorial districts in Akwa Ibom and Cross River States. The instrument for data collection was a structured questionnaire. The data collected were analysed using chi-square statistical analysis to test the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance; and the result of the analysis revealed that: FADAMA III programme has a significant effect on food availability, food affordability, food accessibility and food acceptability in Cross River and Akwa Ibom States, Nigeria. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended, among others, that the government of Akwa Ibom and Cross River States should expand the scope of the FADAMA III Agriculture Development Programme beyond cultivation, rearing and production of agricultural produce and also include agro-business to boost the income of farmers and beneficiaries.
The Efficacy of Joint Border Patrols: Assessing the Impact of the Nigeria-Niger ‘Operation Yaki’ on Cross-Border Crime and Community Relations Okoi, Ibiang
Pinisi Journal of Social Science Vol 4, No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pjss.v4i2.68320

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of ‘Operation Yaki,’ a joint border patrol initiative between Nigeria and Niger, established to combat transborder crime and insecurity in the volatile Sahel region. Set against a backdrop of chronic insecurity characterized by terrorism, arms smuggling, human trafficking, and banditry, the operation represents a critical case study in bilateral security cooperation in Africa. The research investigates the operational efficacy of the joint patrols in suppressing cross-border criminal activities and, with equal emphasis, analyzes their multifaceted impact on community-state relations and inter-communal dynamics along the borderlands. Employing a qualitative methodology that synthesizes policy analysis, security reports, and secondary ethnographic accounts, the paper argues that while Operation Yaki has achieved measurable tactical successes in disrupting criminal logistics and enhancing real-time intelligence sharing, its overall strategic impact is significantly mediated by deep-seated socio-political and structural factors. These include the historical legacy of the colonial border, complex ethnic and kinship ties that transcend state boundaries, local community perceptions of state security forces, and the persistent socio-economic drivers of crime. Findings suggest that the operation, though a necessary and innovative response, often functions within a paradigm of securitization that can inadvertently marginalize border communities, potentially fueling resentment and undermining long-term security. The paper concludes that the efficacy of joint border patrols cannot be judged solely on crime statistics but must be evaluated within a holistic framework that considers community engagement, human security, and developmental interventions. It recommends a recalibration of Operation Yaki towards a more integrated, community-sensitive model of border governance that leverages trust, addresses root causes of instability, and aligns with broader regional security architectures like the Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF) and the G5 Sahel.
Rethinking Woman-to-Woman Marriage in Udenu Community in Enugu, Nigeria Cynthia, Eze Celestina; Grace, Ogelenya
Pinisi Journal of Social Science Vol 4, No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pjss.v4i2.62120

Abstract

This paper undertakes a Christian critique of woman-to-woman marriage, a cultural institution allowing women to assume the social role of husband to other women for purposes of lineage preservation among the Udenu people of Enugu State, Nigeria. The work examines the general concept of woman-to-woman marriage, investigates its specific manifestation among the Udenu people, identifies the socio-cultural factors that inform the practice, and evaluates the moral questions it raises from a Christian perspective. Using phenomenological and evaluative research methods, the study draws on primary data gathered through oral interviews with traditional rulers, community leaders, and elders, supplemented by published academic sources. The findings contribute to debates about the relationship between African traditional practices and Christian moral frameworks, offering insights into how indigenous institutions navigate tensions between cultural rationality and religious doctrine. The study proposes solutions grounded in Christian theology while acknowledging the legitimate cultural concerns that gave rise to the practice. This work provides valuable knowledge for understanding woman-to-woman marriage at both traditional and theological levels and serves as a resource for addressing the complexities of cultural practice and religious belief in contemporary African societies.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 19