cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Hadrianus Tedjoworo
Contact Email
htedjo@unpar.ac.id
Phone
+6222420476
Journal Mail Official
melintas@unpar.ac.id
Editorial Address
Department of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Jl. Nias 2, Bandung 40117, Indonesia
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Melintas An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion
Published by Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
ISSN : 08520089     EISSN : 24068098     DOI : https://doi.org/10.26593
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Religion Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
The aim of this Journal is to promote a righteous approach to exploration, analysis, and research on philosophy, humanities, culture and anthropology, phenomenology, ethics, religious studies, philosophy of religion, and theology. The scope of this journal allows for philosophy, humanities, philosophy of culture and anthropology, phenomenological philosophy, epistemology, ethics, business ethics, philosophy of religion, religious studies, theology, dogmatic theology, systematic theology, theology of sacrament, moral theology, biblical theology, and pastoral theology.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Filsafat
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024)" : 14 Documents clear
Sakrifisi dan Algoritmanya: Sebuah Catatan Propadeutis tentang Rasionalitas Sakrifisial Penciptaan Nilai Bawono, B. Haryo Tejo
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v40i2.8649

Abstract

The word ‘sacrifice’ is both admirable and repulsive. It can be a “desired value” or a “crime against humanity”. Unfortunately, our ancestors left sacrifice theories unresolved. This paper will demonstrate that analyzing and reinterpreting sacrifice texts and theories yields a “sacrificial algorithm.” This term ‘algorithm’ means methodological, not mechanical. This article delves into the economical logic behind sacrifice after examining different concepts and theories on the subject. To address this issue, this article proposes an alternative understanding of both sacrifice and the economy. A change in perspective on sacrifice allows people to recognize its capacity to generate inherent values. Sacrifice can be viewed as a rational response in an irrational world. This allows us to consistently return our lives and lived-experiences to the original meaning of sacrifice, sacra facere, to make something (or some act) sacred.
Toleransi Beragama sebagai Penghormatan pada Pluralitas Quidditas Manusia: Telaah Pemikiran Nicholas dari Cusa Stau, Januarius Martin
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v40i2.8650

Abstract

This article aims to explore Nicholas of Cusa’s views on religious tolerance based on a reading of his work De Pace Fidei. There are some of his ideas that might be useful in the context of religious tolerance. A dialogue among various religious beliefs is one way to find the common ground. For Nicholas, ratio is the way to unify diverse religions, because by nature humans have a desire to know truth, wisdom and God. He believes that the power of ratio is at the same time a belief in the universal grace of God. Nicholas concludes that the purpose of interreligious dialogue is to affirm “uno religio in rituum varietate.” People worship “the same God” in various rites, and different rites are tolerated because through them humans are active and creative in their ways to arrive at the Divine. The basis of Nicholas’ religious tolerance lies in respect to the plurality of unique individuals. He tolerates the plurality of religious rites to a certain degree insofar as they adhere to certain universal principles and live in harmony as expressions of belief in the “One” and bases such plurality on the ontological plurality of human beings.
Atensi, Koneksi-Diskoneksi, dan Hal-Hal yang Mempersulitnya Bawono, Haryo Tejo
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v40i2.8651

Abstract

Book & Film Reviews is a column in "MELINTAS" containing reviews of books and films published recently that bring different interpretation and inspiration to the fields of philosophy and religion.
Bunyi yang Tercecer dari Hannah Arendt Bawono, Haryo Tejo
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v40i2.8652

Abstract

Book & Film Reviews is a column in "MELINTAS" containing reviews of books and films published recently that bring different interpretation and inspiration to the fields of philosophy and religion.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 40 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 40 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 39 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 39 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 38 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 38 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 37 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 36 No. 3 (2020) Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 35 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 34 No. 3 (2018) Vol. 34 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 33 No. 3 (2017) Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017) Vol. 32 No. 3 (2016) Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016) Vol. 31 No. 3 (2015) Vol. 31 No. 2 (2015) Vol. 31 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 30 No. 3 (2014) Vol. 30 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 30 No. 1 (2014) Vol. 29 No. 3 (2013) Vol. 29 No. 2 (2013) Vol. 29 No. 1 (2013) Vol. 28 No. 3 (2012) Vol. 28 No. 2 (2012) Vol. 28 No. 1 (2012) Vol. 27 No. 3 (2011) Vol. 27 No. 2 (2011) Vol. 27 No. 1 (2011) Vol. 26 No. 3 (2010) Vol. 26 No. 2 (2010) Vol. 26 No. 1 (2010) Vol. 25 No. 3 (2009) Vol. 25 No. 2 (2009) Vol. 25 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 24 No. 3 (2008) Vol. 24 No. 2 (2008) Vol. 24 No. 1 (2008) Vol. 23 No. 3 (2007) Vol. 23 No. 2 (2007) Vol. 23 No. 1 (2007) Vol. 22 No. 3 (2006) Vol. 22 No. 2 (2006) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2006) Vol. 21 No. 3 (2005) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2005) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2005) More Issue