cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018" : 6 Documents clear
TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENJUALAN WARISAN OLEH AHLI WARIS TANPA PERSETUJUAN SEBAGIAN AHLI WARIS (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINGGI AGAMA NOMOR 96/PDT.G/2014/PTA MDN) ANIFAH SITOMPUL
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (296.357 KB)

Abstract

The procedure of legal provision on land right transfer because of inheritance, based on the Decree of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs/the head of the National Land Agency No. 3/1997 on Land Registration is that the petitioner as the heir/his attorney files a request for transfer registration by submitting Land Certificate in the name of the heir. Death Certificate in the name attached in the certificate, affidavit in the from of a will, the Court’s Verdict, Judge’s Decision, and heirs’ identity cards. If there is more than one heir, the registration for transfer has to be accompanied by a certificate of inheritance distribution containing notification about the land or building rights which is based on the Corticated of the distribution of the inheritance. If the Land is a grant, the above certificates have to be attached by the certificate of grant/will plus BPHTB ( Duty on Land and Building Rights Acquisition), but if the grant is stiil uncertain, the transfer registration has to be done by heirs and grant receiver and it is considered as joint property. In order to avoid loss of the parties as in the Religious Court’s Verdict No. 96/Pdt.G/2014/PTA.Mdn, the implementation of inheritance distribution has to be done according to legal certaintyby recognizing the process of inheritance land ownership with the prudential principles to ward off legally defective Notarial deed by checking the Certificate of transferring inheritance before the Notary/PPAT, supporting by the evidence of heirs’ approval by checking the land location, getting information about the labd ownership from neighbors, examining the other supporting data, with the seller’s and the buyer’s good faith. The Religious Court’s Verdict No.96/Pdt/2014/PTA. Mdn provides legal protection for the buyer by revoking the Religious Court’s Verdict, Medan, and foreclosure on the case object is considered invalid.Keywords: Court’s Verdict, Grant receiver, Considered as Joint Property
PERKEMBANGAN PENDAFTARAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA DARI SISTEM MANUAL KE SISTEM ONLINE SERTA HAMBATAN-HAMBATANNYA DITA SABILA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (369.548 KB)

Abstract

People’s rapid demand for registering fiduciary collateral has caused the government to make it by online. The launching of fiduciary by online is a concrete effort to provide positive contribution to strengthen movable property as a collateral system in Indonesia. In practice, however, many obstacles faced by a Notary in registering fiduciary collateral by online. The objective of the research is to find out whether registering fiduciary collateral by online has been in accordance with the prevailing regulations, how about the development of fiduciary collateral registration from manual to online system, and how about the obstacles in registering fiduciary collateral by online and the solution.Keywords: Fiduciary Collateral, Fiduciary Registration, Online Fiduciary
PROBLEMATIKA SERTIFIKASI HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH MELALUI AJUDIKASI PASCA BENCANA TSUNAMI DI KOTA BANDA ACEH MUSTAKIM MUSTAKIM
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (181.616 KB)

Abstract

DOSEN PEMBIMBING:1. Muhd Yamin2. Chairani Bustami3. Syafnil Gani Tsunami disaster has brought an impact to the community especially in the fild of land in which the owner and the border of the land is unknown, the evidence of ownership in the form of Land certificate either owned by the owner or the one kept in the Office National Land Board has been penished. This normative juridical study with analytical descriptive approach described and analyzed the problems to be presented referring to the existing provisions of legislation.The result of this study showed that the implementation of certification of rights to land had succeeded in providing a guarantee of certainty of rights to some of the communities impacted by the tsunami disaster, but the result is not yet able to meet the target set due to several constraints met in the field. The constraints found in the implementation of certification of rightd to land were the emergence of multiple certificates, improper land area, unclear boundary of land because it is not mentioned in the certificate due to the unlikely condition in the field, and the emergence of the name of the previous owner in the new certificate even though the rights to land has been transferred.Keywords : Certification, Adjudication, Tsunami Disaster
ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBATALAN PERWALIAN TERHADAP ANAK OLEH HAKIM PASCA PERCERAIAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 400/PDT.G/2011/PN.SBY) RATI WULANDARI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (419.725 KB)

Abstract

DOSEN PEMBIMBING:1. H. M. Hasballah Thaib2. Utary Maharany Barus3. Yefrizawati The guardianship concept grounded on the positive law in Indonesia is principally not far different, according to Law No. 23/2002 on Child Protection, Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage, the Compilation of Islamic Laws, Islamic Laws and Adat Law stating that the guardianship is specified only for minors (underage children), although the age limitation of minors is regulated differently among all these laws. A divorce causes parents’ authority into guardianship. Therefore, when a marriage is separated by the judge, it has the impacts on the guardianship for their minors. The assigning of guardianship can be reviewed by the judge on request of the father or mother based on the change in condition. The legal consequence for the guardianship annulment due to judicial technical mistake of the court in assigning the guardianship is the annulment of the guardianship belonged to the mother named Alda Winona Nurrahmadhani based on the Ruling No. 400/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Sby. The guardianship for the child is returned to both parents as the guardians for their underage child.Keywords: Guardianship, Minor, Divorce.
KEDUDUKAN KOPERASI YANG DINYATAKAN PAILIT DALAM PERMOHONAN PEMBAYARAN HUTANG VETRA R. BERKATSYAH SINAGA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (353.483 KB)

Abstract

DOSEN PEMBIMBING:1. Sunarmi2. Budiman Ginting3. Muhd Yamin A cooperative suffers a loss and is not able to pay off its debt, two methods can be used to solve the problem, either by the decision of membership meeting or by the government directive. The Ruling No. 01/Pailit/2008/PN.Niaga.Smg states the bankruptcy of Koperasi SAM, located in Solo, by the request for bankruptcy by its three managers: BS, LTT, and AW. This research was descriptive analytic with judicial normative approach. The data comprised secondary data which were obtained by gathering primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The legal consequence of the ruling on the bankruptcy of the cooperative’s assets was that all of the cooperative’s assets were under the curators’ control and management. Generally, the rest of the assets of a cooperative which has been closed down is not sufficient to pay off the debt. The legal status of a cooperative as the result of bankruptcy is that it will be closed down. The problems usually come from the debtors who have bad intention or who do not want to pay off their debts; they can embezzle investment when the curators are filing the debtors’ assets by transferring their assets to other places. The result is that the curators cannot detect the debtors’ assets. The non-professional curators in managing bankrupted debtors’ assets can cause another problem. When a cooperative is closed down, its members are only responsible for their main savings and initial capital they have deposited. In the case of some members who give their personal loan to the cooperative, they will have the same status as the other creditors in claiming the payoff of the loan to the cooperative which has a legal entity.Keywords: Status of Cooperative, Bankruptcy, Request for Paying Off Debt
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP SENGKETA TANAH TNI AU, CQ LANUD SUWONDO YANG DIKUASAI OLEH MASYARAKAT SARIREJO (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 229.K/PDT/1991) MAKMUR SIAHAAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (330.901 KB)

Abstract

Dispute in land at the area of 260 ha between TNI AU, in this instance, Lanud Suwondo and tillers at Kelurahan Sari Rejo, Medan Polonia Subdistrict, has not yet settled. Each party claims that they control the land so that they are in conflict. The research used juridical normative method by analyzing legal provisions such as UUPA No. 5/1960, PP No. 24/1997 on Land registration, and the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 229.K/PDT/1991. The nature of the research was descriptive analytic by describing and analyzing the research problems and finding the correct answers as their solution. The legal consequence of the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 229.K/Pdt/1991on both the conflicting parties is that TNI AU, in this instance, Lanud Suwondo is required to comply with the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 229.K/Pdt/1991 which has accepted the claim of 87 plaintiffs for the tillers by handing in the land at the area of 5.6 hectares to the 87 tillers.Keywords: Land Dispute, TNI AU, in this Instance, Lanud Suwondo, Tillers, Kelurahan Sari Rejo

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue