cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019" : 7 Documents clear
KAJIAN YURIDIS TENTANG PELAKSANAAN PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH MILIK YAYASAN CASHIN FITRIADY SETIAWAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (358.012 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1.  Prof. Dr. Muhd Yamin, SH, MS, CN2.  Notaris Dr. Suprayitno, SH, MKn3.  Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum A foundation as an independent legal subject can take legal actions such as buying and selling. The transfer of the assets belonging to a foundation, in this case, land and building, still finds impediment in its process at the Land Office. Land Office still argues that, if the transfer goes on, it will violate Article 5 paragraph 1 of the Foundation Law. This thesis employs the normative juridical research method which is analytically descriptive. The data used to answer the research problems are secondary data. The results of the research demonstrate that, the property of the foundation is obliged to be used in accordance with the purpose and objectives of the foundation and if it is dissolved, according to Article 68 in the Law No. 28/2004 on the Amendment to the Law No. 16/2001 on Foundation, all assets shall be handed over to another foundation which shares similar purpose and objectives.Keywords: Exercise, Transfer, Rights over Land, Foundation
ANALISIS YURIDIS TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI PERSEROAN TERBATAS ATAS PERJANJIAN KERJASAMA YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KERUGIAN NEGARA (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 77 PK/PID.SUS/2015) GEVI ADINDA PUTRI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (303.377 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Bismar Nasution, SH, MH2. Prof. Dr. Saidin,SH, MHum3. Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum Lately, the management of a corporation has gotten public criticism for its unprofessionalism, inefficiency, and no transparency so that it is usually not survived. The problem is what makes their performance inefficient and not optimal. The research problems are how about the position and the role of Directors in managing a corporation, how about their liability for a cooperative agreement which causes the State’s loss, and how about the Panel of Judges’ consideration in handing down the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 77PK/Pid.Sus/2015 stipulated in Law No. 40/2007 on Corporation concerning Directors’ Liability for a Cooperative Agreement which causes the State’s loss. The research used juridical normative and descriptive analytic method. The data were obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. They were gathered by conducting library research and understanding the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 77PK/Pid.Sus/2015 and analyzed systematically qualitatively while conclusion was drawn deductively.Keywords: Liability, Directors, State’s Loss
KEPASTIAN HUKUM HAK EKSLUSIF PEMEGANG DESAIN INDUSTRI ATAS TERDAFTARNYA DESAIN INDUSTRI LAIN YANG MENGALAMI PERSAMAAN PENDAFTARAN MUHAMMAD FIKHRI MIHARDY
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (161.703 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1.  Prof. Dr. Saidin, SH, MHum2.  Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum3.  Dr. Jelly Leviza, SH, MHum Industrial design is one of Intellectual Property Rights with aesthetics protected by the Law No. 31/2000 on Industrial Design. However, the Law only protects the registered industrial designs at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights. In accordance with Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Law on Industrial Design which states that the right over an industrial design is only granted to a new one. The designer will receive an Exclusive Right if he registers it. This right is only owned by someone who has an Exclusive Right and other people are prohibited to make, use, sell, import and distribute the product that has been granted a right over the Industrial Design. The research problems are how the efforts of the legal protection for intellectual property rights can be obtained by a designer of an industrial design, how about the registration and annulment of an industrial design in Indonesia which puts priority to novelty principle based on the Law on Industrial Design, and how about the legal protection for the exclusive rights of the owner of the Industrial Design who finds similarities between his design and another design which has already been registered regarding the ruling No: 07/HKI.Desain.Industri/2015/PN-Niaga.Sby. Although the industrial design has been registered, it still has similarities with other designs that cause financial loss to other parties. In fact, the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights directly receives the registration of an industrial design if the formal requirements are met. If there is not any refusal from other parties at the time the announcement, the certificate for the industrial design can be issued.A substantive or further inspection is required, but the substantive inspective is conducted only when there is a party files an objection or lawsuit to the court.Keywords: Industrial Design Registration, Exclusive Rights, Novelty
ANALISIS YURIDIS SENGKETA ADMINISTRATIF ATAS TANAH BERUPA PEMBATALAN SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK DESA SELAYANG (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 327 K/2016/PTUN.MEDAN) WAHYU UTAMA PUTRA NASUTION
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (356.384 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Muhd Yamin, SH, MS2.  Prof. Dr. Syafruddin Kalo, SH, MHum3.  Dr. Edy Ikhsan, SH, MA A certificate is issued to insure the benefits of the right owner in accordance with the juridical and physical data that have been registered or recorded in the land registry. Land title certificate is useful for the right owner to the third party that they are the owner of the land concerned. The example of this problem is the Case in the Verdict No. 327 K/2016/PTUN. The objective of the research is to find out the causes of the issuance of Land Title Certificate in Selayang Village, the legal protection for the plaintiff against the issuance of the land title certificate, and the judge’s legal consideration in pronouncing the case in the Verdict of the Supreme Court. This thesis employs normative juridical research with analytical description. It is concluded that the legal consideration of the Panel of Judges concerning this case is that Medan State Administrative Court has revoked its Ruling. The Ruling of Medan State Administrative Court is expected to provide legal certainty for the status of the legal object and the land, similar to the case which states that the Plaintiff wins at the level of Cassation and annuls the Land Title Certificate.Keywords: Administrative Dispute, Legal Protection, Judge’s Consideratio
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA PENGGUNAAN SAHAM NOMINEE DALAM PENANAMAN MODAL ASING YANTI MAYA SARI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (183.439 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1.  Prof. Dr. Budimnan Ginting, SH, MHum2.  Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum3.  Dr. Mahmul Siregar, SH, MHum A Notary is a public official who has the authority to draw up authentic deeds and has other authorities as stipulated in Article 1 of Law No. 30/2004 on Notarial Position as it is amended to Law No. 2/2014 on the amendment of Law No. 30/2004 on Notarial Position. The research used juridical normative and descriptive analytic method. The result of the research shows that legal certainty which firmly prohibits a nominee contract is stipulated in Article 33, paragraphs 1 and 2 of Law No. 25/2007 on Capital Investment. It is recommended that a Notary firmly refuse to make a nominee contract, especially when foreign investors want to control the majority of shares in an Indonesian company.Keywords: Notary, Nominee Contract, Capital Investment, Beneficiary Owner, Legal Owner
IMPLEMENTASI EKSEKUSI PENINJAUAN KEMBALI TERHADAP NAMA BAIK NOTARIS YANG DIPUTUS TIDAK BERSALAH (STUDI PUTUSAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI NOMOR : 14/PK/PID/2012) ANDIANY PUTRI MERDEKAWATY
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (346.241 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Budiman Ginting, SH, MHum2. Notaris Dr. Henry Sinaga, SH, MKn3. Dr. M. Hamdan, SH, MHumA suspect’s good name will be a problem when he is free by a court’s verdict. When a defendant is on trial and is found not guilty and set free from any prosecution, he has the right to get rehabilitation from the court. The research problems are how about the implementation of the execution in judicial review on a Notary’s good name when he is found not guilty and how about the position of a Notarial deed in the post-verdic of judicial review. The research used juridicial normative method with descriptive analytic approach. The data were gathered by conducting library research and field research methods. A defendant who is set free from any prosecution, does not sue for compensation, and is not imprisoned, can make a request to the Panel of Judges to rehabilitate his good name through newspapers or other printed media and make civil complaint and file a claim. It is recommended that to get compensation and rehabilitation for good name on a defendant who is found not guilty, not file a complaint to the court.Keywords : Notary, Judicial Review, Rehabilitation for Good Name
ANALISIS YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP JEMAAH UMROH DALAM PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) PT. FIRST ANUGERAH KARYA WISATA (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR : 105/Pdt.SUS PKPU/2017/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst) VERNANDO VERNANDO
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (389.293 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Sunarmi, SH, MHum2. Prof. Dr. Hasim purba, SH, MHum3. Dr. Dedi Harianto, SH, MHumThe candidates of umrah pilgrims (Islamic pilgrimage to Mecca, Saudi Arabia) who had registered and made full payment for umrah promo in 2017 through letter of PT. First Anugerah Karya Wisata should have left in June, 2017, but it was unilaterally postponed and they were offered options to take another schedule or to get refund. The research employs normative legal research method which studies library collections or secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data are collected from analyzing documents and scientific books to gain theoretical basis such as positive law in accordance with the research object. The instrument used to collect the data is document. The analysis is made by applying qualitative technique. The results demonstrate that having the debtor with PKPU requested for reconciliation plan in a proposal such as rescheduling, debt acknowledgment for the unverified and unpaid past due debt by the creditor with PKPU is the form of the legal protection for the creditor with PKPU.Keywords: Legal Protection, Umrah Pilgrims, a Suspension of Debt Payment Obligation, PT. First Anugerah Karya Wisata

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue