cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015" : 10 Documents clear
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PEMEGANG HAK ATAS TANAH DI KAWASAN HUTAN (ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 45/PUU-IX/ 2011 DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 47 P/HUM/2011) ENNI SYARIFAH HARAHAP
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (310.911 KB)

Abstract

The result of the research showed that the Ruling of the Constitutional Court No.45/2011 has judicially reinforced legal certainty for the people entitled to the land rights in the forest area, but it is factually not implemented yet. The Rulling of the Supreme Court No. 47/2011 has also judicially provided legal certainty for the people entitled to the land rights in the forest area, especially in Nort Sumatera. However, the Decree of the Minister of Forestry does not factually accommodate the interest of the people entitled to the land rights. In other words the Decree actually has not yet provided legal certainty for the people entitled to the land rights in the forest area. Keywords: Legal Certainty, Judicial Review, Forestry Law
SURAT KUASA MEMBEBANKAN HAK TANGGUNGAN (SKMHT) YANG DIBUAT DENGAN AKTA NOTARIS BERDASARKAN PASAL 96 AYAT (1) PERKABAN NO. 8 TAHUN 2012 DIKAITKAN DENGAN PASAL 38 UUJN NO. 30 TAHUN 2004 DALAM MELINDUNGI HAK KREDITOR AULIA RACHMAN AMIRTIN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (98.699 KB)

Abstract

The result of this study showed that the SKMHT made under the Notarial deed which should be regulated and object to Article 38 of Law No. No.30/2004 (UUJN) was not realized because the SKMHT was made based on Article 96 paragraph (1) of the Regulation of the Head of Land Board. This was done because if the SKMHT was not made based on Article 96 paragraph (1) of the Regulation of the Head of Land Board, the SKMHT was not accepted during the process of Collateral Right registration in the Office of National Land Board (BPN). The power of proving the SKMHT made under the Notarial deed based on Article 96 paragraph (1) of the Regulation of the Head of Land Board and related it to the stipulation of authentic deed based on Article 1868 and Article 1888 of the Indonesian Civil Codes showed that the SKMHT does not meet any criteria of authentic deed, but it is ignored by either Notary/ Land Certificate Issuing Officer, National Land Board, or even the bank as the interested parties to the SKMHT deed.  The SKMHT deed is in fact does not have an executorial power on the land/the collateral object that it has no power in protecting the right of creditor. Therefore, it is necessary to continue the APHT and the issuance of Collateral Right Certificate which has the executorial power and provides the right of preference to the creditor as the Collateral Right holder. Keywords: Power of Attorney Imposing Collateral Right
TINJAUAN YURIDIS “PERJANJIAN PERCERAIAN” BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN (STUDI KASUS PERJANJIAN PERCERAIAN ANTARA MISNO-NY.EKO SARYUNINGTYAS DAN SUDARMAN SOH-DEWI) KIKI ANNIVIA PRAVITA GUNADI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (289.256 KB)

Abstract

Every human being has a desire to get married, only once and forever. However, maintaining a married life which unites two individuals with different personality and different interest is difficult; therefore, many marriages end with divorces. The divorce itself frequently causes new problem so that many people attempt to make “Divorce Contracts” in order to prevent from the problem. It can be concluded that the provision which clearly and specifically regulates “Divorce Contract” as a unity has not yet been found either in the Civil Code or in Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage. Therefore, the legal basis of “Divorce Contract” should be seen from two perspectives: from material perspective or the content of “Divorce Contract”; that is the right and obligation of husband and wife (Article 30, Article 31, Article 32, Article 33, and article 34 of Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage), and the impact of the end of marriage because of divorce (Article 4, paragraph 3, Article 41, point a and point b in conjunction with Article 45, Article 35 in conjunction with Article 37 and Article 36 of Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage), with definition on the transaction which is prohibited between husband and wife (Article 1467, Article 1601, Article 1678, Article 1910, and Article 1988 of the Civil Code), from the formal perspective or the form of “Divorce Contract”: Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Keywords: “Divorce Contract”, Divorce Consequence
KEDUDUKAN DEBITUR DAN BANK SEBAGAI KREDITUR DALAM HAL WANPRESTASI DEVELOPER (STUDI DI PT. BANK X, CABANG TEBING TINGGI) HARMONO JAPONIKA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (395.558 KB)

Abstract

Credit channeling activities by banks are developing fast. One of the facilities which people are interested in is KPR (Housing Ownership Credit). In the distribution of the facilities of the KPR, sometimes a bank cooperates with a developer to look for a prospective debtor to buy the developer’s houses which have been built or the houses which will be built; or, on the contrary, a developer appoints a certain bank to provide some funds to a debtor who will buy the developer’s houses. The form of cooperation between the bank and the developer is written in a contract. After the prospective debtor is approved to get the credit facilities from the bank, a credit contract commitment and other contract commitments are done. In this case, a debtor buys two houses owned by a developer using KPR facilities of PT. Bank X, but after the credit is liquified by Bank X, the developer fails to build the houses. Keywords: Developer’s Default, Legal Protection for Debtor and Bank, Contract
ASPEK LEGAL PEMUNGUTAN BPHTB BERDASARKAN QANUN KOTA LHOKSEUMAWE NOMOR 04 TAHUN 2010 TENTANG BPHTB NURFADHILLAH NURFADHILLAH
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.369 KB)

Abstract

After Law No. 28/2009 on State and Local Tax and Retribution was in effect, since 2011 BPHTB levying, which used to be the authority of the Central Government, has been shifted to Local Government of Districts/Towns. The law states that levying BPHTB tax in certain area should be stipulated in Perda (Regional Regulation) or Qanun. Based on this condition, Lhokseumawe City Administration issued Lhokseumawe Qanun No. 4/2010 in conjunction with the Mayor Regulation No. 30/2013. Law No. 28/2009 on State and Local Tax states that the levying system of payable BPHTB at Lhokseumawe should use self assessment system, but Qanun No. 4/2010 in conjunction with the Mayor Regulation No. 30/2013 states that the levying system of BPHTB uses official assessment system. The problems of the research were as follows: how about levying system of BPHTB at Lhokseumawe according to Qanun No. 4/2010, how about legal domicile of the Mayor Regulation No. 30/2013, and what obstacles occurred in levying BPHTB, based on Qanun No. 4/2010 at Lhokseumawe. Keywords: Collecting, BPHTB, Qanun
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM ADVISING BANK DALAM PEMBAYARAN BARANG DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN “LETTER OF CREDIT” (Studi Pada The Development Bank of Singapore (Bank DBS) Jakarta) SRI MAYA SARI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.835 KB)

Abstract

Letter of Credit, a payment method in the export-import transaction which is considered as the safe one, in its implementation has some deviations and problems which cause an L/C not to run smoothly. This problem is closely related to the responsibility of the stakeholders that are involved in it. The problem of the research was how about the responsibility of advising bank in paying for goods by using letter of credit. The case occurred in The Development Bank of Singapore (DBS Bank), Jakarta. Here, the L/C transaction occurred between importer and exporter through their banks respectively. However, when the goods arrived at the importer’s warehouse, they were not matched with the ordered ones. The importer ordered coconut shell charcoal, but he received the charcoal waste. The importer then asked the Advising Bank to refund them. The research used judicial normative method. Secondary data were gathered by conducting library research and scrutinizing all legal provisions related to L/C, along with conducting interviews with source persons in order to get the information. The gathered data were analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research, concerning the responsibility of the Advising Bank, shows that the Bank could reject the refund for the L/C because it is only responsible for the things stipulated in Article 34 UCP 600, as long as the documents, in the front view, are in line with the explanation in the L/C documents. When there is a fraud as what occurs in the case above, the bank is not responsible for the form, completeness, originality, forgery, or legal consequences of any document or of the condition mentioned in the document or any addition in the document. The bank is not also responsible for the explanation, the amount, weight, quality, condition, packaging, delivery, value, or the content of the goods attached in the original document. Along with UCP 600, in Article 5, the responsibility of the Advising Bank is limited in the document matters, not in the content of the shipped goods. Keywords: Letter of Credit, Advising Bank
PENERAPAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP PERJANJIAN ISLAM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA NOTARIIL SYAFWATUN NIDA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (262.395 KB)

Abstract

Akad in the Islamic law is a contact made by the partiesconcerned (aqaid) based on the agreement (ikhtiari) which is indicated by presence of ijab and qobul on the aqad object which must be absent from the prohibition stipulated in the legal provision in the Islamic contract. The research used judicial normative and descriptive analytic. The principle of amanah/ keeping the promisewhich is line with the principle of pacta sunt sevanda, the principle of taswiyah (equality) which is in line with the principle of equality in the contract law in the Civil Code. A Notary should understand thoroughly the defference and the similarity of the principles of akad in the Islamic legal contract and in the legal contract found in the Civil code. In consequence, the implementation of making a notarial authentic deed must be based on the guidance of akad in the Islamic law. The principle of the akad must be in line with the procedure of making a notarial authentic deed, base on the legal principles of a contract in the Civil Code according to the prevailing regulations in making a notarial authentic deed. Keywords : Priciples of Agreement, Islamic Law, Notarial Deed
PENERAPAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP PERJANJIAN ISLAM DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA NOTARIIL SYAFWATUN NIDA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (262.395 KB)

Abstract

Akad in the Islamic law is a contact made by the partiesconcerned (aqaid) based on the agreement (ikhtiari) which is indicated by presence of ijab and qobul on the aqad object which must be absent from the prohibition stipulated in the legal provision in the Islamic contract. The research used judicial normative and descriptive analytic. The principle of amanah/ keeping the promisewhich is line with the principle of pacta sunt sevanda, the principle of taswiyah (equality) which is in line with the principle of equality in the contract law in the Civil Code. A Notary should understand thoroughly the defference and the similarity of the principles of akad in the Islamic legal contract and in the legal contract found in the Civil code. In consequence, the implementation of making a notarial authentic deed must be based on the guidance of akad in the Islamic law. The principle of the akad must be in line with the procedure of making a notarial authentic deed, base on the legal principles of a contract in the Civil Code according to the prevailing regulations in making a notarial authentic deed. Keywords : Priciples of Agreement, Islamic Law, Notarial Deed
ANALASIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 28/PUU-XI/2013 TENTANG UJI MATERI ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PERKOPERASIAN OKTO BERLIN GULTOM
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (213.631 KB)

Abstract

Cooperative Law No. 17/2012 is the last law on cooperative legalized by the Legislative Assembly. The law is legalized on 30 October 2012 as the Substitute of  Cooperative Law No.25/1992. Cooperative Law No. 17/2012 is reviewed judicially by six cooperatives and two individuals. Judge of the Constitutional Court  in the decision stated Cooperative Law No.17  is invalid. Due to the decision, Cooperative Law No. 25/1992 is valid as Cooperative Law for temporary until a new cooperative law is legalized. By the cancelation of  Cooperative Law No. 17/2012, the law cannnot be used as the basis of cooperative in Indonesia. The status of the cooperative management that are not from the cooperative members after the decision of Constitutional Court No. 28/PUU-XI/2013 do not have the right to be the cooperative management because the Cooperative Law No. 25/1992 that becomes the temporary Cooperative Law states that management can be choosen from the cooperative members. Government should really make a cooperative regulation for the improvement of cooperative and not only for the interest of government. Cooperative members should be the pole  to improve the potentials possessed so that cooperative members that will become the management improve the cooperative in the future. Keywords: Judicial Analysis, Decision of  Constitutional Court, Cooperative
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENDAFTARAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS PRODUK PERTANIAN DI SUMATERA UTARA DESY PURNAMA SARI NAINGGOLAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (309.213 KB)

Abstract

Sumatera Utara is one of the provinces in Indonesia having several agricultural products which are potential to be the geographical indication. The agricultural product produced by each region in Indonesia have certain characteristic caused by the natural and human factyors or the combination of both of them which distinguish the agricultural product of the same kind originating from different regions in Indonesia. The purpose of this descriptive analytical normative juridical study was to describe and analyze the problems related to the registration of geographical indication of agricultural product in Sumatera Utara discussed in this study. The data for this study were the secondary data obtained through library research in the forms of the regulations or legal materials. Based on the result of this study, the conclusion is that: (1) Mandailing Coffee, Lintong Coffee, Sidikalang Coffee, Deli Tobacco, Binjai Rambutan are several agricultural products which are potential to be the geographical indication originating from several regions in Sumatera Utara, (2) the protection for geographical indication of agricultural product regulated by the law and government regulation is not yet effectively implemented, and (3) the constraints occured during the registration of geographical indication of agricultural products in Sumatera Utara in terms of regilations of legislation, role of government, and the farmers as the producers of georaphical-indicated agricultural products. Keywords: Intellectual Property Right, Geographical Indication, Agricultural Product

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue