cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017" : 10 Documents clear
TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI ATAS KELALAIAN DALAM PENGURUSAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR: 439/PDT.G/2011/PN.JKT.SEL) AHMAD YASIR ARAFAT
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (425.659 KB)

Abstract

Recently, managing a corporation has become a public spotlight since it is not professional, inefficient, and not transparent so that it is difficult to maintain its existence. Public assessment on the performance of board of directors raises a question about the root of the problem which has caused the performance of board of directors to be inefficient and not optimal in managing a corporation. The formula of the problems were as follows: how about the position of board of directors in a corporation according to law on corporation in Indonesia, how about the responsibility of board of director for their negligence in managing a corporation which harms the company, and how about panel of judges’ role in applying the provisions in Law No. 40/2007 on Corporation, related to board of directors’ responsibility for their negligence which caused harm for the company in the Ruling No. 439/Pdt.G/2011/PN.JKT.SEL.The research used judicial normative and descriptive analytical method. The materials of the research were primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data were gathered by conducting library study and understanding the Ruling No. 430/Pdt.G/2011/PN.JKT.SEL. The data were analyzed systematically by using qualitative method and the conclusion was drawn deductively.Keywords: Responsibility, Director, Negligence, Corporation Management
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMENANG LELANG YANG BERITIKAD BAIK ATAS GUGATAN PERLAWANAN DEBITOR PEMBERI JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN YANG TELAH DILELANG OLEH BANK (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 3564.K/PDT/2015) ALWINE ROSDIANA PAKPAHAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (162.342 KB)

Abstract

A loan agreement with mortgage is performed by a bank as the creditor; thus, when a debtor is default in paying the creditor, the creditor possesses the right to execute the mortgage object with his own power after firstly requesting for fiat yustitsia to the head of the district court in the area where the mortgage object lies. This is a normative legal research done by reviewing the law and regulations i.e. Law No. 10/1998 on Banking and Law No. 4/1996 on Mortgage and Bidding Regulation in this research. This is a descriptive analytical research which describes, explains and analyzes problems and finds answers to solve them. The results of the consideration of the cassation appeal judges of the Supreme Court for the complaint filed by the debtor of the mortgage in the Ruling of the Supreme Court No. 3564.K/PDT/2015 is that the cassation appeals filed by the plaintiff I named Z and plaintiff II named S do not have clear legal ground, and the mortgage object is acquired by the mortgage bidding winner through the prevailing procedures and legal provisions so that the possession of the mortgage object is valid, has legal force and has to be legally protected.Keywords: Legal Protection, Bidding Winner, Mortgage Object
KEABSAHAN AKTA NOTARIS DISAAT TERJADI KETIDAKSESUAIAN JABATAN SEBAGAI PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT) DENGAN WILAYAH YANG BERBEDA DAUD WIDYA PRANATA SEPTIADI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (194.829 KB)

Abstract

Regulated in Article 17, letter g of UUJN which states that a Notary is prohibited to do tow positions as a PPAT outside of a notarial area. In other words, a Notary can also function as a PPAT when it is in the same notarial area. Article 19 of UUJN states that a Notary has to take his position in only one area in a town or a district, and he has the authority in the whole provincial territory of his position. A Notary has to have only one office; it means that he is prohibited to have branch office, subsidiary and/or the other types of office, and all deeds have to made in his office except drawing up certain deeds.Keywords: Two Positions, Notary, PPAT, Different Area
KEDUDUKAN CORPORATE GUARANTOR SEBAGAI PIHAK PENJAMIN DEBITUR UTAMA DALAM PROSES KEPAILITAN DIAH HANDAYANI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (361.172 KB)

Abstract

In a guarantee, a guarantor has an extraordinary right required by creditor for released to provide the creditor with safety. The method applied in this research is normative law study method- The position of corporate guarantor that voluntarily release his extraordinary right is same to the main debtor so the corporate guarantor can submit the liquidation with the main debtor. The protection to the corporate guarantee in which the main Debtor did not able to do its liability, the application of liquidation is submitted after all of the property of liquidated debtor is used to pay all of its liability. The protection to the creditor as the holder of corporate guarantor if the main debtor is bankrupt can ask the responsibility of corporate guarantor and if the corporate guarantor is bankrupt, the creditor as the holder of corporate guarantee is take position as concurrent creditor to die corporate guarantor.Keywords : Corporate Guarantor, Main Debtor, Bankruptcy
PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN PENDANAAN DALAM PERJANJIAN BANGUN BAGI DI KELURAHAN TANJUNG SARI MEDAN (RELEVASINYA DENGAN TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS) JULIANITA PERANGIN - ANGIN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (147.062 KB)

Abstract

Build-share contract is a contract which comes from people ’s need because of the rapid development of business law. It is made between developers and land owners, and it is usually preceded by financing agreement among developers who gather an amount of financing for buying land and constructing a real estate according to their agreement. The research used normative juridical method. The nature of the research was descriptive analytic which was aimed to describe, explain, and analyze the research problems and found the answers and the solution. The result of the research showed that the implementation of financing agreement in the build-share contract in the construction of the real estate at Kelurahan Tanjung Sari, Jalan Setia Budi, Medan, was started by making a financing agreement by four developers: developer A shared 30%, developer B shared 40%, developer C shared 20%, and developer D shared 10% of the total capital for constructing a real estate on the land area of 10,729 m2. The Notary’s liability in the dispute due to the default of one of the parties in constructing the real estate at Kelurahan Tanjung Sari was only ethic and moral responsibility by giving legal advice to the conflicting parties so that the dispute was settled by negotiation.Keywords: Financing Agreement, Build-Share Contract, Default
PENERAPAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VII/2010 TERHADAP KEWARISAN ANAK LUAR NIKAH (STUDI PUTUSAN PERADILAN AGAMA) MUHAMMAD FAUZI SYAYREZA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (288.426 KB)

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's decision on the status of children given birth outside of mating, where there is a legal status and inheritance relation illegitimate child after the birth of this decision. The Constitutional Court mean that children born out of wedlock obtain adequate legal protection, because in principle, the child is not guilty because of his birth against their will. Children who are born without a father have a clear status often receive unfair treatment and stigma in the society. Law should provide protection and legal certainty to the status of a child born and rights available to him, including against children born though the validity of the marriage is still disputed.Keywords: Implementation, Inheritance, Illegitimate Children.
KELALAIAN NOTARIS MENGELUARKAN SALINAN KETIKA MINUTA AKTA BELUM DI TANDA TANGANI (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI KISARAN NOMOR 657/PID.B/2015/PN.KIS) RAHMAT HASAN ASHARI HASIBUAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (335.309 KB)

Abstract

The issuance of a copy before the signing of the draft by the persons appearing is invalid and is not in accordance with its procedure. The result of the research shows that the issuance of the copy of a deed before its draft is signed  is violating the image of the professionalism of a Notary as a public official in drawing up authentic deeds as complete and strong evidence. A Notary’s liability for the issuance of the copy of deeds when the minute deed is not signed, in this case, can be viewed from two aspects: the aspect of liability based on the Notarial Act and the Notarial Act. It is recommended that a Notary, in his job to make authentic deeds, understand well, correctly, and carefully in drawing up a deed so that it does not lose its authenticity and harm other people. Keywords: Notary’s Negligence, Copy of Deed, Deed Minuta
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KREDITUR DALAM PEMBERIAN KREDIT DENGAN JAMINAN PURCHASING ORDER APABILA DEBITUR WANPRESTASI (STUDI PERJANJIAN KREDIT PT. BANK MANDIRI DENGAN PT. ERA BANGUN JAYA) TAHI HERMAN ORBERT MANURUNG
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (210.249 KB)

Abstract

Basically, the economic growth which is closely related to public welfare does need the role of business world that is generally constrained by capital or funding. In terms of the world of business, funding constraint is the difficulty faced by the business practitioners, especially those are constrained by inadequate capital, to be able to access funding facility or credit provided by the banks and other financial institutions. To meet that need, recently the banks provided credit facility by accepting Purchasing Order as the collateral for the credit extended. Credit with Purchasing Order as the collateral can be taken by the bank as the consideration in extending the credit to the debtor supported by the analysis of the good-will and ability of the customer (debtor) in repaying the credit in accordance with what has been agreed. In addition, the bank can also anticipate all the risks which may occur through risk mitigation and the involvement of the credit guarantee insurance company to settle the risk in case the debtor breaches the agreement.Keywords: Purchasing Order, Risk Mitigation, Credit Agreement
ASPEK HUKUM PERBEDAAN BESAR NPOPTKP UNTUK WARIS DAN HIBAH WASIAT SERTA BUKAN WARIS DAN HIBAH WASIAT DALAM BPHTB TRI APRIANO ALAMSYAH
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.216 KB)

Abstract

The different rate of NPOPTKP (Non-Taxable Purchase Value) for the same rate of NPOP (Tax Object Purchase Value) will influence the rate of NPOPKP (Taxable Purchase Value). It will then lead to different rate of BPHTB (Property Title Acquisition Duty) that has to be paid by tax payers. It will certainly bring impacts on the justice principle that has to be strongly held in tax collection. Therefore, a research was done on the rate difference of NPOPTKP in calculating the outstanding BPHTB for inheritors and grant beneficiaries; and, for non-inheritors and non-grant beneficiaries, the fulfillment of justice principle in determining the rate of NPOPTKP for inheritors and grant beneficiaries; and, for non-inheritors and non-grant beneficiaries, and on the fulfillment of legal certainty on the alleviation of outstanding BPHTB to inheritors and grant beneficiaries.Keywords: NPOPTKP (Non-Taxable Purchase Value), Inheritance and Grant, BPHTB (Property Title Acquisition Duty)
PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH MASYARAKAT ADAT SIMALUNGUN DI KECAMATAN PANOMBEAN PANEI KABUPATEN SIMALUNGUN YOLANDA REGINA PURBA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (225.905 KB)

Abstract

The legality of land title transfer owned by the adat community whose land is uncertified and the transfer is transparently witnessed by an adat leader and the other witnesses from both parties is valid, as far as both parties do their task in paying off and transferring the land. In general, uncertified adat land is transferred transparently, in cash, and witnessed by an adat leader and witnesses from both parties; this especially occurs in Panombean Panei Subdistrict, Simalungun Regency. The inhibiting factors in the implementation of land title transfer owned by an individual legally are as follows: lack of clarity of the parties concerned in explaining the adat land status, lack of clarity in its borders, and disapproval of family members and adat leader. This lack of clarity is caused by the difficulty in fulfilling the requirements for transferring an adat land in Panombean Panei Subdistrict, Simalungun Regency.Keywords: Communal Land, Customary Law Society, Simalungun.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10


Filter by Year

2017 2017


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue