Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

PREMISE LAW JURNAL

premise
Website

Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara

ISSN : - EISSN : - DOI : -

Core Subject : Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 11 Documents

1 2

Search results for , issue "Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016" : 11 Documents clear

ANALISA KASUS ATAS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1134/PDT/2009 TENTANG KEPEMILIKAN HAK MILIK YANG KEMUDIAN SUBJEKNYA DIKETAHUI SEBAGAI WARGA NEGARA ASING ATAS DASAR WASIAT DARWIN DARWIN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (287.918 KB)

A foreign citizens cannot be ignored to be an heir as stipulated in Article 26, paragraph 3, Article 30 paragraph 2, and Article 36 paragraph 2 of UUPA the legal consequence of violating it is that the ownership will be cancelled. The result of the Case of the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 1134 K/Pdt/2009 research shows that the procedure if signing a will before a Notary for a foreign citizen in making a certificate should pay attention to the spa of time of the land rights by checking the identity of the foreign citizen and the other supporting documents. The list of data at the Sub-directorate of Estate in the Ministry of Law and Human Rights by giving the copy of the Will which has been made in Indonesia. The legal status of the Ownership certificate registered in the name of the defendant is recognized as the defendant’s since the land has been registered sporadically and transparent in the name of the defendant, based on the will and the man empowered to receive the will. It is also approved be the authorities such as Subdistrict Head, the National Land Board, and witnessed by the neighbors. Besides that, the defendant has changed his citizenship before the certificate is issued. The judge’s consideration in the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 1134 K/Pdt/2009 does not give legal certainty in the administrative process of issuing the certificate. Keywords: Foreign Citizen, Ownership, Will

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP STRUKTUR NOMINEE PEMEGANG SAHAM (NOMINEE STRUCTURE) DALAM SUATU PERSEROAN TERBATAS HENDRIK TANJAYA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (245.833 KB)

Nominee structure is a structure resulting in a beneficiary has the power to controls the nominee, where a nominee is only as a registered owner of an object, and the beneficiary as the real owner is the one who controls, manages and earns benefits from that object. Nominee structure is often applied in the ownership of shares in a limited liability company in Indonesia. The data for this normative juridical study were obtained through documentation study in which the data obtained were systematically arranged and analyzed through a qualitative scientific logic procedure. The form of nominee shareholder structure in Indonesia is divided into direct nominee structure and indirect nominee structure. Basically the validity of a nominee shareholder structure is depends on the validity of the underlying agreement. A public notary as the competent authority who creates an authentic deed as the underlying of a nominee structure is responsible to make sure that the deed he made must comply to and does not breach the prevailing laws and regulations. It is suggested that a clear and strict regulations about the nominee shareholders should be governed in the Company Law in order to create legal certainty. Nominee shareholder structure should be allowed with special supervision and certain restrictions, considering the using of a nominee is basically indispensable in order to transact effectively and efficiently, particularly in capital markets. Keywords: Nominee Structure, Shareholders, Limited Liability Company.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (245.833 KB)

TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS SETELAH BERAKHIR MASA JABATANNYA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 30 TAHUN 2004 JO UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 2 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG JABATAN NOTARIS IRWANDA IRWANDA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (256.931 KB)

A notary is a public official appointed by the Government; in this case, the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of Republic of Indonesia, who has a function to provide a service to the society and an authority to make an authentic deed in almost all legal actions as referred to the laws. This is a normative judicial research with prescriptive analysis which approaches the research problems by reviewing the prevailing legal provisions in the Notarial Law stipulated in UUJNNo. 30/2004 (the Law on Position of Notary) juncto UUJNNo. 2/2014. The results show that he has to make an authentic deed in line with the prevailing legal provisions in the Notarial Law as stipulated in the UUJN No. 30/2004 juncto the UUJNNo. 2/2014 and Article 1868 of Civil Code regarding the Procedure of the Making of Authentic Deed for Public Official. Notary whose tenure has ended is still responsible for the deeds he has made until he passes away because there is no regulation in the prevailing provisions that obviously states the time limit of the responsibility of a Notary for the deed he has made. He is also responsible for the making of the authentic deed concerning the names of the persons appearing and the accuracy of the date of the deed. In case there is any suit to the authentic deed. Keywords: Notary’s Responsibility, Tenure Ends, UUJN No. 30/2004 juncto UUJN No. 2/2014

ANALISIS NORMATIF TERHADAP JAMINAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN BANGUNAN DEBITUR YANG BERSERTIPIKAT TUMPANG TINDIH SAAT AKAN DI EKSEKUSI ISABELLA BANGUN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (207.44 KB)

In its development nowadays, land becomes the most common problem, particularly about the overlapping certificates. In general, the problem about this overlapping certificate occurred in a tract of land which has double certificates and the owner of the land want to or has done legal action on the land. For example, a land certificate is used as collateral in a Bank, but execution cannot be accomplished because there is another person who has the certificate on the land. Therefore, the researcher wanted to find out what factors which caused the incident of overlapping certificates and how about the legal protection for the Bank as the creditor. The result of the research shows that the factor which causes the incident of overlapping certificate is administrative error (internal factor) done by some employees intentionally for their own interest in the Land Office, while the external factor of the Land Office is the bad intention of the person who requests his right for registering the certificate, Therefore, the management of the Land Office as the institution which issues land rights certificates is not responsible for the existence of overlapping certificate although they are always ready to be the mediator in resolving the dispute about overlapping certificate by doing the study on physical and judicial data. The Bank, as the creditor for this problematic collateral, does not get any legal protection because there is no regulation in the legal provisions although the creditor can file the claim to the debtor, since the latter has violated the law, by asking for compensation from the debtor when the judge gives the verdict that the land belongs to the third party. Keywords : Overlapping Certificate, Collateral

ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBATALAN PERKAWINAN KARENA PERGANTIAN AGAMA DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM ISLAM JUMIATI HARAHAP
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (181.986 KB)

One of the interesting things in Marriage law is about marriage cancellation. Based on Article 22 of Marriage Law, it is said that if a marriage does not meet marriage requirements, it can be cancelled. It is possible for a marriage, which is religiously valid but does not follow the rules and laws, according to Article 22 of Marriage Law, to be cancelled.The research used descriptive analytic and judicial normative method. The conclusions of the research were as follows: Islam highly emphasizes on the requirement for the same religion in wedlock because the purpose of marriage in Islam is a marriage is not solely related to muamalah (relationship among human beings), the judge’s consideration at the Medan Religious Court in his Verdict No 569/Pdt.G/2008/PA.Mdn states that marriage cancellation due to a divorce is not a cancellation and legal consequence of marriage cancellation on the relationship between husband and wife is considered void, the child’s right is not retroactive, and property for the husband and wife who have good faith, except joint property. It is recommended that a marriage couple participate in pre-marriage counseling and judges prioritize the Islamic personality principle. They should be cautious and their consideration be related to the causality of religious conversion in marriage. Keywords: Cancellation, Marriage, Religious Conversion (Apostasy), Legal Consequence

KEKUATAN HUKUM SURAT KETERANGAN AHLI WARIS YANG DIKELUARKAN KEPALA DESA SEBAGAI ALAS HAK DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI (PJB) OLEH NOTARIS BAGI WNI BUMIPUTERA LATIFAH HANUM
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (155.08 KB)

Certificate of Heir for native citizens is usually made by the heirs themselves, signed by Village Head, and acknowledged by Subdistrict Head. Besides that, it can also be directly made by Village Head and acknowledged by Subdistrict Head; it contains the names of heirs who have the right to inherit the property. The research used judicial normative and descriptive analytic method. The result of the research shows that Certificate of Heir which is made by the heirs, signed by Village Head, and acknowledged by Subdistrict Head. A Notary is not responsible for a sales contract which uses Certificate of Heir issued by Village Head, and thus it is considered invalid. A Notary is only responsible for the authenticity of a Sales Contract drawn up by him since it is in line with the prevailing legal provisions on Notarial Position as stipulated in UUJN (Notarial Act) No. 30/2004 juncto UUJNNo. 2/2014. Keywords: Certificate of Heir, Village Head, Notary, Native Citizens

ANALISIS HUKUM ATAS TUGAS DAN PERANAN NOTARIS DALAM PENDIRIAN KOPERASI SEBELUM DAN SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PERKOPERASIAN DAN PASCA KELUARNYA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 28/PUU-XI/2013 ORRIZA JULIA ERVIANTY
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (221.42 KB)

Cooperative is a business entity which has individuals or cooperative legal entity as its members and its activities are based on cooperative principle and its people-based economic movement which is based on the principle of consanguinity. The deprivation of Law No. 17/2002 on Cooperative by the Constitutional Court is because it is regarded as being contrary to the general principle of cooperative. The research used judicial normative and descriptive analytical methods by analyzing. After the issuance of administrative regulation of Law No. 25/1992 on Cooperative in 2004, the Regulation of the Minister of Cooperative, and UKM (Small and Medium Enterprises) No. 01/Per/M.KUKM-I/2006 on Operational Manual and the issuance of Law No. 17/2012 on the new Cooperative, the role of a Notary becomes important because cooperative memorandum of association has to be made by using notarial authentic deed which is validated and registered in the Ministry of Cooperative and UKM and because the Constitutional Court temporarily waits for the issuance of the new Law on Cooperative by the Parliament. Keywords: Cooperative, Notary, the Ruling of the Constitutional Court No. 28/PUU-XLV013

ANALISIS YURIDIS PERUBAHAN HAK ATAS TANAH DARI STATUS HAK GUNA USAHA MENJADI HAK PENGELOLAAN PADA KAWASAN EKONOMI KHUSUS SEI MANGKEI PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA III (PERSERO) SHEILA ARSITYANI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (222.226 KB)

PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III (Persero) has to perform land acquisition in the area of 2,002.77 hectares at Sei Manmgke Village, Bosar Maligas Subdistrict, Simalungun District, which would be Specific Economy Area. Since the Leasehold is still attached to the land, PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III (Persero) amended the Leasehold to the Right to Manage in condition that the company filed the permit of Leasehold to the Land Office of North Sumatera. The result of the research showed that, the company filed a survey on the Leasehold area in the area of 2,002.77 hectares to the Land Office of North Sumatera. After the renunciation of rights was approved, the request of the Right to Manage was filed to the National Land Board of the Republic of Indonesia. The result was that the Head of the National Land Board of the Republic of Indonesia issued the Decree No. 27/HPL/BPN RI/2014 on the Approval of Giving the Right to Manage on the name of PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III (Persero), located in Medan for 4 (four) tracts of land, located in Simalungun District, North Sumatera on June 23, 2014. The changing process from the Leasehold to the Right to Manage in the Specific Economy Area Sei Mangke was constrained since the Layout of Simalungun District was not completed so that the Specific Economy Area did not have the layout, the constraint of the term of the change of the right, and internal and external constraint in that area. Keywords: Right to Manage, Leasehold, Specific Economy Area Sei Mangke, PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III (Persero)

ANALISIS YURIDIS SENGKETA KEPEMILIKAN TANAH GARAPAN DI DESA HELVETIA KECAMATAN LABUHAN DELI KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 537.K/Pdt/2011) YUSRIANSYAH RAMADHAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (491.007 KB)

A dispute over land rights commonly occurs in society. It has occurred in Helvetia Village, Labuhan Deli Sub-District, Deli Serdang District based on the Supreme Court’s Ruling No.537.K/Pdt/2011.The problems of research were whether or not the renunciation of rights and the compensation for tilled land were legitimate based on the judge’s consideration and the legal consequence for the tilled land ownership; and, how about the settlement for the tilled land dispute based on the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 537.K/Pdt/2011 which had given a legal certainty to the owner. This research applied descriptive analysis design which was aimed to provide a systematical, factual, and accurate description. A descriptive analytical research describes, reviews, explains, and analyzes laws both theoretically and practically in the research results. Keywords: Dispute, Ownership, Tilled Land

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 11

1 2

Filter by Year

2016 2016

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
Kota medan,

Sumatera utara

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official -

Editorial Address -

Location Kota medan, Sumatera utara INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
Kota medan,

Sumatera utara

INDONESIA