cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
polsains@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
polsains@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sekaran, Kec. Gn. Pati, Kota Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50229
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Unnes Political Science Journal
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26216272     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/upsj
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Unnes Political Science Journal is a journal present the studies of research, either field research, literature research, or analysis reflection article of political issues in Indonesia. Unnes Political Science Journal will be published that related to politics and governance, election, and local election; Politics and Local Policy and also Political Thought and Ethics
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Sosiologi dan Ilmu Politik
Articles 2 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "vol. 10 no. 1 (2026)" : 2 Documents clear
Comparing Political Campaign Strategies of PDIP and PKS in the 2024 Legislative Election in Banyumas, Indonesia Yunita Ratna Sari; Neneng Sobibatu Rohmah; Titis Perdani
Unnes Political Science Journal Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/upsj.v9i2.35482

Abstract

This study examines the campaign strategies carried out by PDIP and PKS in the legislative elections 2024 in Banyumas Regency. Campaign strategies have a significant influence on candidate victory in the election. Data were obtained through in dept interviews and direct observation  of key informations, namely the management of the PDIP and PKS DPDs in Banyumas regency. The results of the study show that the campaign startegies carried out by PDIP and PKS are almost the same in the 2024 legislative elections in Banyumas regency, although there are difeferences. PDIP and PKS both use social media such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok. The campaign message conveyed to constituents is also the same, namely the welfare of the community. The difference is PDIP in determining communicators with in the election winning institution (BP Pemilu) and PKS uses a campaign team. PDIP's target is the millenial generation, gen Z, new voters while PKS is more on the general public.
Football Supporter Activism as a Political Force in Modern Football Governance and Reform Paul Moento; Marolahy Jacquot Urbain; Ari Wirachandra; Yuni Indah
Unnes Political Science Journal Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/upsj.v10i1.47635

Abstract

Football is no longer merely a form of sport and entertainment but has developed into a social arena in which political, cultural, and collective identities interact. This study analyzes the development of football supporter activism as a new form of sociopolitical participation and examines its implications for digital mobilization, club policies, and modern football governance. A qualitative approach was employed through a literature review of scholarly articles, research reports, and other relevant sources. The findings show that supporters have shifted from passive consumers to collective actors with significant social and political influence. Their activism addresses not only club-related interests but also social justice, inclusivity, human rights, and resistance to the excessive commercialization of football. Social media strengthens connective action by enabling rapid coordination across geographical boundaries and integrating online and offline activism. Supporter pressure also encourages clubs to adopt more inclusive, transparent, welfare-oriented, and socially responsible policies. In governance, supporters are increasingly recognized as stakeholders who promote accountability, regulatory reform, and more democratic ownership models. However, excessive commercialization, financial inequality, intergroup conflict, and inadequate digital regulation remain significant challenges. The study advances understanding of supporter activism and calls for adaptive, inclusive, and sustainable football policies.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024)