cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Suprapto
Contact Email
atoenurse@gmail.com
Phone
+6281244066082
Journal Mail Official
admin_jih@edi.or.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Dgr. Ramang Biringkanaya Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Journal Interdisciplinary Health
Published by Lembaga Edukasi Ilmiah Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31090281     DOI : https://doi.org/10.61099/jih
Core Subject : Health,
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Veterinary
Journal Interdisciplinary Health is a scientific journal that focuses on cross-disciplinary studies in the field of health, which aims to integrate various scientific approaches in understanding, analyzing, and finding solutions to health problems at the individual, community, and global levels. The journal also committed to improving the high-quality research by publishing analytic techniques, measures, and research methods, not an exception to systematic review papers.
Arjuna Subject : Profesi Kesehatan - Profesi Kesehatan (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal Interdisciplinary Health" : 5 Documents clear
Building an Interdisciplinary Framework for Global Health Solutions: A Qualitative Study Zakiyyah Putri, Sitti
Journal Interdisciplinary Health Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal Interdisciplinary Health
Publisher : Edukasi Ilmiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61099/jih.v2i1.160

Abstract

Introduction: Global health challenges are becoming increasingly complex as they are shaped by the dynamic interaction of biomedical, social, economic, environmental, and political determinants. Persistent health inequities, fragile health systems, and emerging global threats have demonstrated the limitations of conventional discipline-specific approaches. Although interdisciplinary approaches are widely promoted as essential for addressing these challenges, there remains a lack of empirically grounded frameworks that clearly operationalize interdisciplinarity in global health practice. Methods: This study employed a qualitative research design using an interpretive descriptive approach to explore how interdisciplinary collaboration is understood, practiced, and sustained in global health contexts. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 50 purposively selected stakeholders representing diverse disciplinary backgrounds, including public health, clinical practice, social sciences, economics, environmental health, and policy. Participants were selected based on their professional experience and involvement in interdisciplinary global health initiatives. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, applying both inductive and deductive coding to identify recurring patterns, relationships, and key themes that informed the development of an interdisciplinary framework. Results: Six core themes emerged from the analysis. Global health was understood as a complex, multidimensional system that requires integrated approaches across disciplines. Interdisciplinarity was perceived as both a mindset and a practical process, emphasizing shared problem framing, complementary disciplinary contributions, and iterative knowledge integration. Inclusive leadership and supportive institutional and policy environments were identified as critical enablers of effective collaboration, while structural silos, disciplinary hierarchies, and power imbalances remained persistent barriers. These findings demonstrate that interdisciplinarity in global health is a practical necessity rather than a purely conceptual ideal. Conclusion: This study concludes that strengthening global health outcomes requires the institutionalization of interdisciplinary approaches that integrate diverse forms of knowledge, promote shared problem framing, and address power imbalances across disciplines. The proposed empirically grounded framework offers a practical foundation for advancing integrated, context-sensitive, sustainable, and scalable global health solutions across diverse settings.
Integrating Multidisciplinary Approaches to Strengthen Community Health Outcomes: A Qualitative Perspective Prasetyowati, Prasetyowati; Kaharto, Kaharto
Journal Interdisciplinary Health Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal Interdisciplinary Health
Publisher : Edukasi Ilmiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61099/jih.v2i1.173

Abstract

Introduction: Community health outcomes continue to face complex challenges driven by the interaction of biomedical, social, economic, environmental, and behavioral determinants. Fragmentation across health disciplines often limits the effectiveness and sustainability of community health interventions. Integrating multidisciplinary approaches has been increasingly promoted to address these challenges; however, empirical evidence explaining how such integration operates in community-based settings remains limited, particularly from a qualitative perspective. Methods: This study employed a qualitative research design using an exploratory and interpretive approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and document reviews involving purposively selected stakeholders engaged in multidisciplinary community health initiatives. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key patterns, processes, and contextual factors influencing multidisciplinary integration. Results: The findings revealed that effective multidisciplinary collaboration is shaped by shared goals, role clarity, communication practices, and meaningful community engagement. Socio-cultural and institutional contexts were found to significantly influence how collaboration is enacted in practice. Participants perceived that multidisciplinary integration improved coordination, reduced service fragmentation, and enabled a more holistic response to community health needs. Conclusion: This study concludes that multidisciplinary approaches strengthen community health outcomes by fostering coordinated, context-sensitive, and people-centered health interventions. Qualitative insights highlight the importance of relational and contextual factors in sustaining effective multidisciplinary collaboration in community health systems.
Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Strategies in Addressing Public Health Challenges: A Quantitative Study Tri Astuti, Indra
Journal Interdisciplinary Health Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal Interdisciplinary Health
Publisher : Edukasi Ilmiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61099/jih.v2i1.174

Abstract

Introduction: Public health challenges are increasingly complex and driven by the interaction of biomedical, social, economic, environmental, and behavioral determinants. Addressing these challenges requires integrated responses that transcend single-discipline approaches. Interdisciplinary strategies have been widely promoted; however, quantitative evidence demonstrating their effectiveness in improving public health outcomes remains limited. This study aimed to quantitatively examine the effectiveness of interdisciplinary strategies in addressing public health challenges and to analyze the relationship between interdisciplinary collaboration and public health program effectiveness. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional analytical design was employed. The study involved a total population of 50 health professionals and program managers from primary health care centers, hospitals, and public health offices engaged in interdisciplinary public health activities. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire measuring interdisciplinary strategy implementation, including interprofessional communication, shared decision-making, and coordination across disciplines. Public health program effectiveness was assessed through indicators of program performance, service delivery efficiency, and perceived outcome improvement. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: he findings indicated that the mean scores for all dimensions of interdisciplinary strategies and public health effectiveness were above the midpoint of the scale, reflecting positive implementation levels. Bivariate analysis demonstrated statistically significant positive correlations between interdisciplinary strategy implementation and public health program effectiveness (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). Interprofessional communication and coordination across disciplines showed the strongest associations with public health effectiveness. Conclusion: Interdisciplinary strategies are significantly associated with improved public health program effectiveness. Strengthening structured collaboration, communication, and coordination across disciplines is essential for addressing complex public health challenges and enhancing sustainable public health outcomes
Relationship between knowledge level and contraceptive compliance among family planning acceptors: A Cross-Sectional Study Suprapto, Suprapto
Journal Interdisciplinary Health Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal Interdisciplinary Health
Publisher : Edukasi Ilmiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61099/jih.v2i1.175

Abstract

Introduction: Contraceptive compliance is a key determinant of the effectiveness of family planning programs. Inadequate compliance may lead to contraceptive failure, unintended pregnancy, and reduced confidence in family planning services. Knowledge level is considered an important factor influencing compliance; however, empirical evidence linking knowledge to contraceptive compliance remains limited, particularly in primary health care settings. This study aimed to examine the relationship between knowledge level and contraceptive compliance among family planning acceptors. Methods: A quantitative analytical study with a cross-sectional design was conducted at selected primary health care facilities. The study involved 50 women of reproductive age who were active family planning acceptors. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge of contraception, and contraceptive compliance. Knowledge levels were categorised as low, moderate, or high, while the correct and consistent use of contraceptive methods and adherence to follow-up schedules were used to assess compliance. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: 44.0% of respondents had a high level of knowledge, 36.0% had moderate knowledge, and 20.0% had low knowledge. Overall, 62.0% of respondents were compliant with contraceptive use. A statistically significant relationship was found between knowledge level and contraceptive compliance (p = 0.012). Respondents with high knowledge levels demonstrated the highest compliance rate (81.8%), while non-compliance was most prevalent among those with low knowledge levels (70.0%). Conclusion: Knowledge level is significantly associated with contraceptive compliance among family planning acceptors. Strengthening structured and client-centred educational and counselling interventions is essential to improve contraceptive compliance and enhance the effectiveness of family planning programs
Exploring interdisciplinary nursing care models: A Qualitative Clinical Study Lontaan, Anita; Trayanus Lasarus Djaha, Yohan
Journal Interdisciplinary Health Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal Interdisciplinary Health
Publisher : Edukasi Ilmiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61099/jih.v2i1.176

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing complexity in healthcare systems demands integrated, collaborative approaches to patient care. Interdisciplinary nursing care models have been promoted to enhance care coordination, patient safety, and quality outcomes. However, limited qualitative evidence exists regarding how these models are understood, implemented, and experienced by nurses in clinical practice. This study aimed to explore interdisciplinary nursing care models from nurses’ perspectives, focusing on roles, communication processes, facilitators, barriers, and perceived impacts on patient care and professional development. Methods: A qualitative clinical study was conducted in selected clinical units of a tertiary healthcare facility. Purposive sampling was used to recruit registered nurses with at least one year of clinical experience and active involvement in interdisciplinary care. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. Trustworthiness was ensured through member checking, audit trails, and reflexive practices. Results: Seven major themes emerged: understanding of interdisciplinary nursing care, nurses’ roles and responsibilities, communication and collaboration, facilitators of interdisciplinary care, barriers to interdisciplinary care, impact on patient care outcomes, and professional development and learning. Effective communication and collaboration were identified as the most critical elements supporting interdisciplinary care. Nurses played central roles as care coordinators, contributing to improved care quality, patient safety, and patient-centered outcomes. Organizational support and mutual respect facilitated collaboration, while hierarchical structures, role ambiguity, and workload constraints were identified as key barriers. Conclusion: Interdisciplinary nursing care models are strongly influenced by communication quality, recognition of nurses’ professional roles, and organizational support. Despite existing barriers, effective interdisciplinary collaboration enhances patient outcomes and supports continuous professional development. Strengthening structured interprofessional communication and supportive organizational policies is essential for sustainable interdisciplinary nursing practice.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal Interdisciplinary Health Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Journal Interdisciplinary Health Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Journal Interdisciplinary Health Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Journal Interdisciplinary Health Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Journal Interdisciplinary Health