ProBank: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan
We invite unpublished research, empirical study, book review, short communication and high quality research work pertaining to the recent developments and practices in the areas of Economics, Corporate Governance, Industrial Relations, And emerging paradigms in allied subjects like Accounting, Accounting Information Systems, Accounting Theory and Practice, Auditing, Behavioral Accounting, Behavioral Economics, Corporate Finance, Cost Accounting, Economic Development, Economic History, Financial Institutions and Markets, Financial Services, Fiscal Policy, Government and Non Profit Accounting, International Economics and Trade, International Finance, Macro Economics, Micro Economics, Rural Economics, Finance, Banking, Co-operation, Demography, Development Planning, Development Studies, Econometrics, Applied Economics, Development Economics, Business Economics, Monetary Policy, Public Policy Economics, Regional Economics, Tax Accounting as well as emerging paradigms in allied subjects.
Articles
12 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 3, No 2 (2018)"
:
12 Documents
clear
Analisa Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kualitas Laba Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur
V. Titi Purwantini;
Supriyono Supriyono
ProBank Vol 3, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : STIE AUB Surakarta
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.36587/probank.v3i2.370
The purpose of this studi is to analyze of Factors that affect the Company Value with the Quality of profit as intervening variable on manufacture company on Manufacturing Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange. The results obtained as follows: Direct Influence Managerial ownership has a negative and significant effect on Corporate Value, Institutional ownership has a positive and significant effect on Corporate Value, Audit Committee existence has negative and insignificant effect on firm value. Indirect Effect is managerial ownership has a negative and insignificant effect on profit quality as well as earnings quality has positive and significant effect to company value, institutional ownership has negative and insignificant effect on profit quality and earnings quality have positive and significant influence to company value while existence of audit committee influences positive and significant to profitability as well as earnings quality have positive and significant impact to company value. Direct influence Managerial ownership of Corporate Value is greater than the indirect effect of managerial ownership on Corporate Value by mediating the quality of earnings so as to increase the Company's value of the selected direct path. It can be said that earnings quality can not function as intervening variable between managerial ownership and company value. The direct effect of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Value is greater than the indirect effect of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Values with the mediation of earnings quality, so as to increase the Company's value of selected direct paths. It can be said that earnings quality can not function as intervening variable between managerial ownership and company value. The Influence of Audit Committee's Existence on Corporate Value is less than indirect influence The existence of the Audit Committee on Corporate Values with the mediation of earnings quality so as to increase the Company's value is chosen indirect path. It can be said that earnings quality can serve as intervening variable between Audit Committee's existence with company value. Keywords: managerial ownership, institutional ownership, presence of audit committee, corporate value, earnings quality
PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN DAN BUDAYA ORGANISASI TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN BANK SYARIAH DENGAN KEPUASAN KERJA SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING
Tri Widianto;
Supriyono Supriyono
ProBank Vol 3, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : STIE AUB Surakarta
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.36587/probank.v3i2.379
This research aims to know: 1) the influence of a leadership toward the employees performance, 2) the influence of an organization culture toward the employees performance, 3) the influence of a leadership toward the job satisfaction of the employee, 4) the influence of an organization culture toward the job satisfaction of the employee, 5) the influence of a job satisfaction toward the employees performance. The data are collected from 90 respondents by using a census method. They are analyzed through the research instruments such as a validity test by using a product moment test and the reliability test by using a cronbach alpha technique; path analysis; a determination coefficient (R2); t test; F test and direct and indirect effect. The research result shows that 1) the influence is positive significant of a leadership toward the employees performance, 2) the influence is positive significant of an organization culture toward the employees performance, 3) the influence is positive significant of a leadership toward the employees job satisfaction, 4) the influence is positive but not significant of an organization culture toward the employee job satisfaction, 5) the influence is positive significant of a job satisfaction toward the employee performance, 6) the influence is positive not significant of an organization culture toward the employee performance via employee job satisfaction, but the leadership influences positive significant toward the employee performance via the employee job satisfaction as intervening variable, 7) the coefficient determination the first similarity shows that R Square is 0,093 or 9.3%, means job satisfaction variable explains leadership and organization culture is 9.3% and while its remain 90.7% is explained by other variables which are not involved in the regression model such as a job environment and discipline, so that coefficient determination of the second similarity shows that R Square is 0.652 or 65.2%, means the performance explains a leadership, organization culture and job satisfaction is 65.2% and while its remain 34.8% is explained by other variable which is not involved in the regression model such as a job environment and discipline. Key word: leadership, organization culture, job satisfaction, performance