cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdul Kadir Jaelani
Contact Email
indonesiacontrariusinstitute@contrariusactus.com
Phone
+6287738904981
Journal Mail Official
jaelaniabdulkadir@staff.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sibela Utara Street No.3, Mojosongo, Kec. Jebres, Kota Surakarta.
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Contrarius
Published by Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia
ISSN : 30909309     EISSN : 31090931     DOI : https://doi.org/10.53955/contrarius.v1i3
Core Subject : Social,
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Contrarius focuses on administrative law at global, national, regional, and local levels worldwide. The journal addresses specific issues on tax law, consumer protection law, environmental law, medical law, spatial law, labour law, agrarian law, transportation law, mining law, energy law, administrative, and legal justice. Contrarius publishes peer-reviewed while increasing the efficiency of the process. In addition, Contrarius also covers legal research in constitutional law with specific topics such as separation of powers and procedural due process, the structure and workings of the various agencies, procedural requirements for adjudication and rulemaking, enforcement discretion, methods of enforcement, government tort liability, freedom of information, and state finance. The journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars with related disciplines. Novelty and recency of issues, however, are the priority in publishing.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius" : 5 Documents clear
Economic Justice as a Legal Strategy for Countering Terrorism in Nigeria: Learning from the United Kingdom Experience Aidonojie, Paul Atagamen; Eregbuonye, Obieshi; Okpoko, Mercy Osemudiame; Hassan, Ismaila; Inagbor, Micheal
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i1.226

Abstract

This study analyzes the role of economic justice as a lawful and sustainable counter-terrorism strategy through a comparative examination of the United Kingdom and Nigeria. Nigeria continues to prioritize military intervention as the principal response to terrorism; however, persistent violence indicates that structural socio-economic inequalities, unemployment, and regional marginalisation sustain conditions conducive to radicalisation. In contrast, the United Kingdom integrates economic justice within its legal and policy framework, thereby complementing security measures with socio-economic regulation. This research aims to evaluate the legal basis for implementing economic justice measures in counter-terrorism and to assess their relevance for long-term peacebuilding in Nigeria. The study employs a doctrinal research method by systematically examining legislation, public policy instruments, and scholarly works through the PRISMA framework to ensure transparent and rigorous source selection. The findings demonstrate that, first, the United Kingdom establishes a normative and institutional framework that links welfare regulation and social protection to the prevention of violent extremism; second, it enforces financial accountability and regulatory oversight to limit structural grievances and disrupt potential channels of radicalisation; and third, Nigeria maintains a predominantly securitised counter-terrorism regime that lacks enforceable economic rights and targeted development legislation. The study concludes that Nigeria should reform its legal framework by embedding inclusive economic governance, strengthening institutional accountability, and codifying socio-economic rights as integral components of a sustainable counter-terrorism strategy.
Does Indonesian Bankruptcy Law Protection for Curators in Bankruptcy? Nuryanto, Ahmad Dwi; Bosha Ahmed , Mohammed AlHadi Ibrahim
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i1.258

Abstract

A curator is someone who is appointed by the court to manage and organize the bankruptcy assets of the debtor in carrying out his duties must be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. When carrying out their duties, curators must be independent and have no conflict of interest with either the debtor or creditors as stipulated in the provisions of Article 15 paragraph 3 of Law Number 37 of 2004. For this reason, the following problems can be formulated, why the burden of the curator's performance in carrying out the bankruptcy estate needs legal protection for the curator, what are the inhibiting factors or threats to the curator in the bankruptcy estate and how to reconstruct the regulation of legal protection of the curator in carrying out the bankruptcy estate. The writing of this dissertation aims to analyze and find the burden of the curator's performance in carrying out the administration of bankruptcy property needs legal protection for the curator, to analyze and find inhibiting factors or threats to the curator in the administration of bankruptcy property, to analyze and find the reconstruction of legal protection for the curator in carrying out the administration of bankruptcy property in order to realize justice-based sustainability. This type of research used is normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by breaking down legal issues and at the same time providing prescriptions. The research used is descriptive analytical. Thus, the need for immunity rights implicitly regulated in the law in order to protect curators in carrying out the administration of bankruptcy assets in order to create justice for all parties in bankruptcy. reconstruction of legal protection regulations for curators in carrying out the administration of bankruptcy assets is to add a new norm formulation to Article 69 of the Bankruptcy Law by strengthening the role of curators in the management and administration of bankruptcy assets, adding immunity rights and / or legal assistance by curator professional organizations and state institutions when curators are reported in suspected criminal acts.
Unprotected Land Ownership Rights in Corporate Land Acquisition Lego Karjoko; Nabila Rahma Safitri; Ravi Danendra
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i1.261

Abstract

Land ownership conflicts in Indonesia frequently emerge in plantation regions when local communities cultivate land in fact while corporations assert formal legal control over the same land. This situation generates agrarian disputes that expose structural tensions between the formal land certification regime and long-established patterns of community land use. This study examines the philosophical orientation underlying judicial reasoning in adjudicating disputes concerning Land Use Rights held by PT Perkebunan Nusantara Persero and evaluates the degree of legal protection granted to communities that cultivate land without formal certificates. The research applies a normative legal method through statutory and case approaches. The study relies on primary and secondary legal materials gathered through systematic literature review and analyzes them using deductive reasoning and interpretative analysis. The findings demonstrate that judicial panels in five cases placed primary emphasis on formal legal certainty by prioritizing documentary evidence of title and by disregarding factual realities related to community cultivation. This approach directs adjudication toward procedural compliance and limits consideration of substantive justice and social utility. The analysis further shows that the legal system has not provided adequate protection for affected communities. Effective preventive protection requires clearer regulatory arrangements governing land control by communities and state-owned enterprises. Effective repressive protection requires judges to assess both formal documentation and material evidence in a balanced manner. The study concludes that current judicial practice has not achieved equitable legal protection for communities engaged in cultivated land use.
Consumer Dispute Resolution Decision Policies and Business Implications Rina Arum Prastyanti; Prattana Srisuk
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i1.263

Abstract

Consumer disputes between business actors and consumers continue to challenge the effectiveness of Indonesia’s consumer protection framework, particularly in the implementation of arbitration mechanisms. Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection formally mandates the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency to adjudicate disputes, yet regulatory and institutional limitations hinder the optimal execution of arbitration-based decisions. This study examines and analyzes the regulatory framework governing the execution of arbitration in consumer dispute resolution, identifies its normative and structural weaknesses, and formulates a justice-oriented reconstruction of the relevant provisions. The research applies a constructivist paradigm and adopts a sociological juridical approach. It integrates normative legal analysis with empirical field data to assess how arbitration functions in practice. The study systematically organizes and qualitatively analyzes both primary and secondary data to produce a comprehensive evaluation of the existing regulatory model. The findings demonstrate substantive inconsistencies between consumer arbitration procedures and the broader arbitration regime, structural weaknesses within the institutional framework of dispute resolution bodies, and limited consumer awareness regarding legal rights. These deficiencies reduce legal certainty and weaken the effectiveness of arbitration outcomes. The study concludes that lawmakers must reconstruct specific statutory provisions, particularly those governing the execution of arbitral decisions, in order to strengthen institutional coherence, enhance legal certainty, and ensure justice in consumer dispute resolution.
Achieving Sustainable and Responsible Consumption Production Policy through Integrated Waste Management in Residential Areas Luthviati, Resti Dian
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i1.266

Abstract

Effective and sustainable waste management constitutes a central component of environmental governance and public health protection, particularly in residential areas located along the administrative borders of Surakarta City. Border settlements frequently experience disparities in infrastructure provision, limited supervisory control, and uneven public service delivery, which collectively weaken the effectiveness of integrated waste governance. This study analyzes the implementation of the regional regulatory framework on integrated waste management in these peripheral residential areas and evaluates the institutional, regulatory, and socio legal constraints that affect its practical operation. The research applies a qualitative design grounded in empirical fieldwork. The study collects primary data through structured interviews with relevant stakeholders and analyzes the data using a normative and comparative approach. It compares Indonesia’s waste governance practices with selected international models implemented in Germany, Japan, and Singapore to identify transferable principles and institutional mechanisms that may strengthen local implementation. The findings demonstrate that the regulatory framework provides a systematic structure for integrated waste management; however, implementation gaps persist. Limited public awareness, inadequate waste processing facilities, and weak inter institutional coordination significantly hinder policy effectiveness, particularly in border residential zones. The study concludes that the government must intensify community engagement strategies, strengthen environmental education programs, and enhance cross sectoral collaboration to ensure the realization of sustainable and responsible waste management in border areas.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Contrarius Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Contrarius Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Contrarius