cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Firmansyah
Contact Email
panipahanf@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jiir@uinsa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Center for Integrative International Studies Laboratory, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya Address: Dr. Ir. H. Soekarno Street No. 682, Gununganyar, Surabaya, Indonesia, Postal Code 60294, Phone (031) 8479384, Fax (031) 8413300 (Zaky), E-mail: jiir@uinsa.ac.id
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Journal of Integrative International Relations
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel
ISSN : 24773557     EISSN : 27970345     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15642/jiir
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Social Sciences
Journal of Integrative International Relations (JIIR) published by Center for Integrative International Studies Laboratory, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel Surabaya in association with The Indonesian Islamic Studies and International Relations Association (INSIERA). The journal published multi-disciplinary, inter-disciplinary, and trans-disciplinary approach articles on various issues in the field of International Relations. Special attention is given to the acedemic articles related to Islamic Integration methodology which synthesis critically between Islamic Studies and International Relations.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): November" : 5 Documents clear
Konflik Kawasan: Studi kasus Sengketa Masjidil Al Aqsa Sintaya Luchma Fudia; Ahmad Afifudin Fajrin; Akrima Bunga Yunia Rizqi; Aisyah Uswatun Chasanah
Journal of Integrative International Relations Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): November
Publisher : Center for Integrative International Studies Laboratory, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jiir.2022.7.2.133-147

Abstract

Conflict is inseparable in human life. Where there is interaction where it is prone to conflict. conflicts almost occur in all parts of the world, including in the Middle East Region. This conflict in the Middle East began since the fall of the Ottoman Empire during the first world war. as we know the Otoman kingdom has been in power for centuries and has a vast area including the Middle East. the collapse of the Ottoman Empire's power made its territory fall to Great Britain including the Middle East. this is what ultimately gave birth to the "state" of Israel. this is one of the causes of conflict in the Middle East. For the example of the conflict that occurred was the conflict between Israel and Palestine. Israel-Palestine fought Masjidil Aqsa, one of the world's historic sites. they claimed each other that the Masjidil Aqsa was theirs. In this journal we see the conflict between the Aqso mosque and foreign policy theory and conflict theory.
Analisis Kebijakan Demokratisasi sebagai Instrumen Kekuasaan dalam Politik Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat Kardina Hamado; Rahmat Sikky
Journal of Integrative International Relations Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): November
Publisher : Center for Integrative International Studies Laboratory, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jiir.2022.7.2.156-174

Abstract

Democratization is US policy which campaign democrazy as the norms and values through realist and liberal strategy in foreign politic. This research is aimed to know the interest behind the democratization policy and US authority position globally. This reasearch used national interests concept, foreign policy and foreign politic by applying descriptive analysis method. The result of this research showed that nations thus considered to have violated the democrazy principles are a thread to washington intererst occurrence. Democratization as instrument is proven beneficially to US to intervence by economic and military politic to determine democracy standard which affected toward US impact and authority in various country significantly.
The Alteration of the Philippines Foreign Policy towards China over Disputes in the South China Sea Muhammad Dedy Yanuar; Anggraeni Sevira Priyanka Rahmmadinniyah
Journal of Integrative International Relations Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): November
Publisher : Center for Integrative International Studies Laboratory, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jiir.2022.7.2.109-132

Abstract

As one of the most protracted issues in the world politics, South China Sea (SCS) disputes have frequently sparked boiling tension among claimant states- China, Taiwan Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and in particular the Philippines - one of the most assertive claimant states aside China. During the administration of President Benigno Aquino III, the Philippines managed to internationalize the case of SCS disputes and ultimately won a victory over China in the Permanent Court Arbitration (PCA), the Netherlands. However, when a government transition occurred from Benigno Aquino III to Rodrigo Duterte in 2016, those PCA credits appeared to be not followed up by President Duterte. This ensued due to the differences in views and political will between Aquino and Duterte on foreign policy. This article aims to unravel and explain on the Philippines’ foreign policy alteration towards China over SCS disputes under Duterte’s administration, using the concept of Realpolitik and Rational Choice to comprehend why President Duterte decided to seemingly abandon his predecessor’s policies. This research employed qualitative method - data collection was obtained from the secondary data and literature study, comprising written documents related to the Philippines foreign policy in responding to the disputes. The results showed that the reason why Duterte abandoned his predecessor’s footpath is because he assumed that the way Aquino applied such assertive approach is not effective enough in resolving this prolonged maritime jurisdictional disputes between the Philippines and China. In this way, Duterte applied a more considerate diplomatic approach to China as his rational choice in a sense that he would rather take cooperative instead of confrontational way of settlement in resolving the disputes of maritime territory over the South China Sea.
An Analisys of Indonesian Political Economic Policies In National Economic Recovery Due To Global Pandemic Turbulence Bayu Mogana Putra Bayu Mogana Putra; Ridwan Adnan Erlangga
Journal of Integrative International Relations Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): November
Publisher : Center for Integrative International Studies Laboratory, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jiir.2022.7.2.95-108

Abstract

The pandemic turbulence caused countries worldwide, including Indonesia, to experience economic turbulence. The research in this scientific paper focused on studying the national economic recovery policies that the Indonesian government produced as the political economy policies in the country's economic recovery after the pandemic turbulence. This scientific paper aimed to determine the effectiveness and productivity of political economy policies in the national economic recovery in Indonesia. Lastly, this scientific paper revealed the Indonesian government's political economy policies in the national economic recovery after the pandemic turbulence through three main aspects as analytical tools. Those aspects consisted of allocation, distribution, and evaluation of the implementation of the national economic recovery. Therefore, the effectiveness and productivity of the national economic recovery policies that the government implemented could be revealed through political economy policies.
The Sertifikasi Halal Indonesia Ditolak Negara Muslim: Penolakan Sertifikasi Halal di Negara Muslim Afin Jibrani
Journal of Integrative International Relations Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): November
Publisher : Center for Integrative International Studies Laboratory, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jiir.2022.7.2.148-155

Abstract

Sertifikasi halal merupakan kegiatan pemberian label halal melalui riset dari Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Produk Halal (BPJPH) untuk dipasarkan baik itu bentuknya produk ataupun jasa. Sertifikasi halal saat ini menjadi jaminan bahwa produk yang telah diberi sertifikasi halal merupakan produk yang higienis dan menyehatkan. Sertifikasi halal sebuah produk yang dilakukan oleh LPPOM MUI tidak dapat diterima atau ditolak oleh negara lain. Alasannya karena tidak ada penanggung jawab secara resmi dari otoritas Indonesia. Berbeda dengan Malaysia, yang menentukan sertifikasi produk halalnya adalah pemerintah Malaysia sendiri sekaligus bertanggung jawab jika produknya terindikasi zat yang tidak sesuai ketentuan produk halal. Pada tahun 2014 Indonesia mendirikan BPJPH sebagai penanggung jawab dari otoritas jaminan produk halal Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang penulis gunakan adalah kualitatif komparatif untuk mengetahui bagaimana langkah yang harus dilakukan oleh Indonesia agar produk dengan logo halal dapat diterima oleh negara muslim maupun non muslim. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apa yang menyebabkan produk halal yang disertifikasi oleh MUI tidak diterima oleh negara muslim. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah alasan ditolaknya produk halal Indonesia di negara muslim dikarenakan negara tidak memiliki otoritas yang dapat menjamin produk halal.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): November Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): May Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): November Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): May Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): November Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): May Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): November Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): May Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): November Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): May Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): November Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): May Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): November Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): May Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): November Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): November More Issue