cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Desi Sommaliagustina
Contact Email
nawalaedu@gmail.com
Phone
+6281374694015
Journal Mail Official
nawalaedu@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Raya Yamin No.88 Desa/Kelurahan Telanaipura, kec.Telanaipura, Kota Jambi, Jambi Kode Pos : 36122
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
Ipso Jure
Published by PT Anagata Sembagi Education
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30327644     DOI : https://doi.org/10.62872/55p1zf80
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Ipso Jure is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal dedicated to advancing scholarly research and discourse in the field of law, with a particular emphasis on the principles of the rule of law. The journal aims to provide a platform for academics, legal practitioners, policymakers, and researchers to address contemporary legal issues and trends that shape societies globally. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), ensuring free access and reuse with proper attribution. Focus Ipso Jure focuses on exploring current and emerging legal challenges that influence the development and application of the rule of law. The journal seeks to publish original research that offers innovative perspectives, rigorous analysis, and practical insights into legal systems, theories, and practices. By fostering interdisciplinary and comparative approaches, Ipso Jure aims to contribute to global legal scholarship and promote dialogue among diverse legal traditions. Scope The journal welcomes original research articles, theoretical analyses, and policy reviews that address issues and trends in the following areas of law: Administrative Law Agrarian Law Banking Law Civil Law Commercial Law Comparative Law Constitutional Law Corporate Law Criminal Law Cyber Law Economic Law Environmental Law Human Rights Law International Law Legal Philosophy and Theory Legal Sociology Types of Contributions Ipso Jure primarily publishes original research articles (3,000–5,000 words) that present empirical findings, theoretical insights, or critical analyses. The journal also considers high-quality review articles or policy analyses that align with its scope and contribute significantly to legal scholarship. All submissions undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality and integrity, as outlined in our Publication Process. Audience The journal targets a global audience, including: Legal scholars and researchers seeking to advance knowledge in law. Legal practitioners addressing practical challenges in their fields. Policymakers and government officials shaping legal frameworks. Students and educators exploring contemporary legal issues. Commitment to Open Access As an open access journal, Ipso Jure ensures that all published content is freely accessible to readers worldwide without financial or legal barriers. Authors retain full copyright of their work, and articles are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, promoting the widest possible dissemination and reuse of research. For submission details, please refer to our Author Guidelines. For questions about the journal’s focus and scope, contact the editorial team at nawalaedu@gmail.com.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 15 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025)" : 15 Documents clear
Legal Liability for Algorithmic Malpractice in Digital Medical Diagnosis Teguh Santoso
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025)
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ij.v2i10.51

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence in digital medical diagnostics offers significant benefits but also introduces new risks, including algorithmic malpractice resulting from inaccurate or biased system outputs. This study examines the legal liability framework for algorithmic malpractice using a normative legal research method, analyzing statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and comparative international approaches. The findings indicate that liability remains predominantly placed on physicians, despite evidence that many algorithmic errors originate from design flaws, data bias, or technical failures outside clinical control. Hospitals and algorithm developers also contribute to systemic risks, highlighting the need for a multi-actor liability model. Regulatory reforms are required to establish algorithm audit obligations, risk assessments, human oversight mechanisms, transparency standards, and the adoption of shared or strict liability for developers. This study underscores the necessity of comprehensive regulation to ensure patient protection and legal certainty in the era of medical digitalization.
Disagreement Between Heavy Equipment Tax Regulations and The Mandate of The Constitutional Court Decision on Road and Environmental Damage Variables Mardiana Mardiana; Riza Purwanti; Denny Slamet Pribadi
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025)
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ij.v2i10.50

Abstract

This study examines in depth the disharmony between the Heavy Equipment Tax provisions in Law No. 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations between the Central Government and Local Governments and the mandate of Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XV/2017. The research focuses on the inconsistency in the formulation of the basis for imposition and characteristics of Heavy Equipment Tax, which has not internalized the variables of road damage and environmental impact as negative externalities from the use of heavy equipment. The main legal problem lies in the absence of the integration of road/environmental damage weight coefficients as previously known in the Motor Vehicle Tax (PKB) regime, so that the regulatory objectives that should reflect the regulatory function are not achieved. In addition, the lack of clarity in the legal approach is evident in the methodological choice of the legislators, who only adopted a budgetary approach without considering the conceptual approach of the polluter pays principle and the relevant Pigouvian tax theory to control the externalities of heavy equipment. This study is a normative (doctrinal) legal study using a statute approach to assess the conformity of the HKPD Law with the Constitutional Court's decision and a conceptual approach to examine the need to include road and environmental damage variables in the design of heavy equipment tax. The results show that heavy equipment tax regulations in the HKPD Law are still oriented solely towards budgetary functions, without adequate regulatory instruments to correct the negative externalities of heavy equipment use on public roads and in operational areas. The conclusion of the study confirms that the failure to fulfill the Constitutional Court's mandate has led to uncertainty in the concept of heavy equipment tax regulation and resulted in a lack of synchronization between the constitutional goal of environmental protection and the design of regional fiscal policy.
The Effectiveness of Derivative Actions as a Means of Protecting The Interests of Minority Shareholders in Limited Liability Companies Mardiana Mardiana; Nun Fadillah Muslimah; Johan Tri Noval Hendrian Tombi
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025)
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ij.v2i10.49

Abstract

This study examines Derivative Actions as a legal instrument to protect minority shareholders in Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia based on Law Number 40 of 2007. The main issue discussed is the effectiveness of Derivative Actions in ensuring fairness and balance of power between majority and minority shareholders. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal framework of Derivative Actions in the Indonesian corporate legal system and evaluate its relevance to the application of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) principles. This study uses a normative (doctrinal) legal method with a juridical, conceptual, and case approach. Data was collected from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation. The findings show that Derivative Actions provide a solid legal basis for minority shareholders to sue Directors or Commissioners who violate their fiduciary duties; however, their practical application is still limited due to procedural complexity and lack of legal awareness. This study concludes that Derivative Actions play a vital role in realizing corporate justice, improving management accountability, and strengthening transparency and responsibility in corporate governance in Indonesia.
Legal Protection for Government Employees with Work Agreements (PPPK) from a Human Rights Persfective in Indonesia Ulya Ulya; Sukamto Satoto; Helmi Helmi
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025)
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ij.v2i10.48

Abstract

ASN Law changes the categorization of the State Apparatus into Civil Servants (PNS) and Government Employees with Work Agreements (PPPK). If we associate with the form of appointment of PPPK is a work agreement for a certain period of time, then the PPPK position is implicitly a government employee who has legal force in the employment agreement. The employment agreement for PPPK is a binding legal relationship between Non-PNS government employees and the government agencies that employ it. The entry of Government Employees with Work Agreements (PPPK) as part of ASN is expected to be an accelerator in efforts to realize ASN professionalism. Some treatments to PPPK in ASN Law are not in accordance with human rights, namely principles of equality, non-discrimination, interrelation, interdependence and state responsibility. The regulation on PPPK shows the country's setback in formulating indicators for fulfillment of the right to work
The Effectiveness of Derivative Actions as a Means of Protecting The Interests of Minority Shareholders in Limited Liability Companies Mardiana Mardiana; Nun Fadillah Muslimah; Johan Tri Noval Hendrian Tombi
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025)
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ij.v2i10.49

Abstract

This study examines Derivative Actions as a legal instrument to protect minority shareholders in Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia based on Law Number 40 of 2007. The main issue discussed is the effectiveness of Derivative Actions in ensuring fairness and balance of power between majority and minority shareholders. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal framework of Derivative Actions in the Indonesian corporate legal system and evaluate its relevance to the application of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) principles. This study uses a normative (doctrinal) legal method with a juridical, conceptual, and case approach. Data was collected from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation. The findings show that Derivative Actions provide a solid legal basis for minority shareholders to sue Directors or Commissioners who violate their fiduciary duties; however, their practical application is still limited due to procedural complexity and lack of legal awareness. This study concludes that Derivative Actions play a vital role in realizing corporate justice, improving management accountability, and strengthening transparency and responsibility in corporate governance in Indonesia.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 15

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 12 (2026): Ipso Jure - January Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Ipso Jure - February Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Journal of Ipso Jure-December Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025) Vol. 1 No. 12 (2025): Ipso Jure - January Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025): Ipso Jure-October Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): Ipso Jure - September Vol. 2 No. 7 (2025): Ipso Jure - August Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): Ipso Jure - July Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): Ipso Jure - June Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Ipso Jure - May Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Ipso Jure - April Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Ipso Jure - March Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Ipso Jure - February Vol. 1 No. 11 (2024): Ipso Jure - December Vol. 1 No. 10 (2024): Ipso Jure - November Vol. 1 No. 9 (2024): Ipso Jure - October Vol. 1 No. 8 (2024): Ipso Jure - September Vol. 1 No. 7 (2024): Ipso Jure-August Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): Ipso Jure - July Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): Ipso Jure- June Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Ipso Jure - May Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Ipso Jure - April Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Ipso Jure - March Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Ipso Jure - February More Issue