cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Lukman Cahyadi
Contact Email
lukman.cahyadi@esaunggul.ac.id
Phone
+6289661704102
Journal Mail Official
lukman.cahyadi@esaunggul.ac.id
Editorial Address
Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul Jakarta
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Fisioterapi: Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi
Published by Universitas Esa Unggul
ISSN : 18584047     EISSN : 25283235     DOI : https://doi.org/10.47007/fisio.v22i2
Core Subject : Health, Science,
Health Professions Physics
Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi aims to spread conceptual thinking or ideas, review and the research findings obtained in the field of Physioterapy Science. This journal focuses on the issues of Physioterapy Science involving : Pediatric Neurology Musculoskeletal Cardio pulmonal Sport Geriatric
Arjuna Subject : Profesi Kesehatan - Terapi Fisik, Olah Raga dan Rehabiltasi
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 16, No 2 (2016): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi" : 5 Documents clear
ADAPTASI LINTAS BUDAYA MODIFIKASI KUESIONER DISABILITAS UNTUK NYERI PUNGGUNG BAWAH (MODIFIED OSWESTRY LOW BACK PAIN DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE/ODI) VERSI INDONESIA
Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 16, No 2 (2016): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/fisio.v16i2.1708

Abstract

AbstractThe research objective was to determine the cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire modifications for low back pain disability (modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire) version Indonesia. The study was conducted through cross-cultural studies in a way forward translation, backward translation and comparison of contextually translation results, as well as the analysis of the questionnaire validity test and reliability test questionnaire. Results are expected to produce an instrument measuring lower back pain disability Indonesian version. The research method is done by collecting data on 42 subjects lower back pain conducted in West Jakarta and Tangerang. Data retrieval is purposive sampling done twice for two weeks. The results showed the modified item questionnaire in point 4 (walk) with units of miles to kilometers based on the original version. Test the validity of the questionnaire showed all were 10 valid items with a mean ± .174 .722. Reliability test showed a high consistency with Cronbach alpha .890. Conclusion research suggests modifications disability questionnaire for low back pain (modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire) Indonesian version valid and reliable for use in clinical practice physiotherapy in Indonesia. Keywords: Disability, Lower Back Pain, Oswestry Questionnaire AbstrakTujuan penelitian adalah mengetahui adaptasi lintas budaya modifikasi kuesioner disabilitas untuk nyeri punggung bawah (modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire) versi Indonesia. Penelitian dilakukan melalui studi lintas budaya dengan cara forward translation, backward translation dan perbandingan hasil terjemahan secara kontekstual, serta analisis uji validitas butir kuesioner dan uji reliabilitas kuesioner. Hasil penelitian diharapkan dapat menghasilkan instrumen pengukuran disabilitas nyeri pinggang bawah versi Indonesia. Metode penelitian dilakukan dengan pengambilan data pada 42 subjek nyeri pinggang bawah yang dilakukan di Jakarta Barat dan Tangerang. Pengambilan data secara purposive sampling dilakukan sebanyak dua kali selama dua minggu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya modifikasi item kuesioner pada butir 4 (berjalan) dengan satuan mil ke kilo meter berdasarkan versi asli. Uji validitas menunjukkan semua butir kuesioner berjumlah 10 valid dengan rerata .722±.174. Uji reliabilitas menunjukkan konsistensi yang tinggi dengan Cronbach alpha .890. Konklusi penelitian menunjukkan modifikasi kuesioner disabilitas untuk nyeri punggung bawah (modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire) versi Indonesia valid dan reliabel untuk digunakan dalam praktik klinis fisioterapi di Indonesia. Kata Kunci: Disabilitas, Nyeri Punggung Bawah,Kuesioner Oswestry
PERBEDAAN PENINGKATAN AGILITYDAN PENINGKATAN PEMAIN BASKET ANTARA PEMAIN BASKET SMALL MAN DAN BIG MAN DENGAN PEMBERIAN LATIHAN LADDER DRILL
Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 16, No 2 (2016): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/fisio.v16i2.1707

Abstract

AbstractBackground: Basketball is a team sport. The difference between humans small and Bigman it's not about size, but this is about the position of the player. The little guy is a player out of position like the pont guard, shooting guard and small forward and Bigman is a basketball player at the position under such a power forward and center as a player. The main difference of the work makes a difference in characteristics including agility. Agility is very important in basketball. Agility can be improved with practice, but because there are differences betwen the characteristics, so that could be the result of differences in training for small agilty man and Bigman. Ladder drill exercise is one exercise that aims to improve agility. Forms of exercise walking, jumping and sliding in the box that makes like a staircase on the second floor. The person must be run, or jump through a staircase. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the differences between humans increases the agility of small and large people after exercise drill ladder. Example: The sample is a basketball player who has played for at least 2 years. There are 20 basketball players and they are divided into two groups. One group is the little man by ladder and the other exercises are great people who were also given training drill ladder. Exercise ladder commonly used for basketball players and was included in the training program basketball player. So the researchers gave the exercise of their own players without giving Researcher Training Methods: This quasi-experimental, where this measure agility between the two groups after the exercise drill ladder. Agility will be measured by Test Hexagonal Obstacle. samples will be tested after six weeks programmed. results; The hexagonal obstacle test scores in the second desciribed, Results: The mean man hexagonal small test before 12.59 seconds (sd = 1,242) and after exercise 12.27 seconds (sd = 0833), and, the results of the test hexagonal constraints Bigman is the mean average before 13.03 seconds (sd = 0950) and after the exercise of 11.24 seconds (sd = 1344) hypothesis is tested by independent T test and the result was p = 0.009 <@ 0:05 So researchers suggest there needs to be another exercise the power of intelligence such reseach pylomteric exrcise Conclusion; There is a difference in improving agility between the small and the big man after a workout drill ladder for basketball players. Keywords: Small man, big man, agility  AbstrakLatar Belakang: Basket adalah olahraga tim. Perbedaan antara manusia kecil dan Bigman itu bukan tentang ukuran tetapi ini adalah tentang posisi pemain. Orang kecil adalah pemain di luar posisi seperti penjaga pont, shooting guard dan small forward dan Bigman adalah pemain di posisi basket di bawah seperti power forward dan center sebagai pemain. Perbedaan dari pekerjaan utama membuat perbedaan dalam karakteristik termasuk kelincahan. Agility sangat penting dalam basket. Agility dapat ditingkatkan dengan latihan, tetapi karena ada perbedaan betwen karakteristik, sehingga bisa menjadi hasil perbedaan latihan untuk agilty small man dan Bigman. Tangga latihan drill adalah salah satu latihan yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kelincahan. Bentuk latihan berjalan, melompat dan meluncur di dalam kotak yang membuat seperti tangga di lantai. Orang tersebut harus dijalankan, atau melompat melalui tangga. Tujuan: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan kelincahan yang meningkat antara manusia kecil dan orang besar setelah latihan drill tangga. Contoh: Sampel adalah pemain basket yang sudah bermain selama minimal 2 tahun. Ada 20 pemain basket dan mereka dibagi menjadi dua kelompok. Satu kelompok adalah laki-laki kecil yang diberi tangga latihan dan yang lainnya adalah orang besar yang juga diberi latihan drill tangga. Latihan tangga yang umum digunakan untuk pemain basket dan itu termasuk dalam program latihan pemain bola basket. Jadi Peneliti memberikan latihan dari pemain tanpa memberi Peneliti sendiri Metode Latihan: Ini kuasi eksperimental, di mana ini mengukur kelincahan antara dua kelompok setelah latihan drill tangga. Agility akan diukur oleh Hexagonal Uji Kendala. sampel akan diuji setelah enam minggu diprogram. Hasil; skor tes kendala heksagonal itu desciribed di kedua, Hasil: Hasil heksagonal uji small man berarti sebelum 12,59 detik (sd = 1.242) dan setelah latihan 12,27 detik (sd = 0.833), dan, hasil kendala heksagonal tes Bigman adalah rata-rata sebelum 13,03 detik (sd = 0.950) dan setelah latihan 11,24 detik (sd = 1.344) hipotesis diuji dengan uji T independen dan hasilnya adalah p = 0,009 <@ 0.05 Jadi Peneliti menyarankan ada perlu lain latihan reseach kekuatan kecerdasan seperti pylomteric exrcise Kesimpulan; Ada perbedaan dalam kelincahan meningkatkan antara manusia kecil dan orang besar setelah latihan drill tangga untuk bola basket pemain. Kata kunci: Small man, big man, agility
PENGARUH PENAMBAHAN TRUNK CONTROL EXERCISE DAN LATIHAN BERDIRI DI STANDING FRAME DENGAN LATIHAN BERDIRI DI STANDING FRAME TERHADAP KESEIMBANGAN BERDIRI ANAK CEREBRAL PALSY SPASTIC DIPLEGIA
Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 16, No 2 (2016): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/fisio.v16i2.1706

Abstract

AbstractObjective: Determine the effect of trunk control exercise and standing frame exercise with standing frame exercises to standing balance in children cerebral palsy spastic diplegia. Methods: An experimental study to determine the effect of an intervention on the subject of research. The sample consisted of 20 children with cp spastic diplegia 3-10 years of age, the study for 6 weeks 3x in one week. Samples were grouped into two groups. The first group (n = 10) and treatment to two (n = 10). Results: The results of hypothesis testing in the group treated first with related t-test p value = 0.001. In the treatment group to two with related t-test p-value = 0.002. On the results of independent t-test showed the value of p = 0.302. In the treatment group I showed the test mean = 15.95 and SD = 18.9. In the treatment group II is obtained in a test mean = 15.45 and SD = 17.25. Conclusion: There is no difference between the effect of the provision of trunk control exercise to exercise in a standing frame and exercises in the frame standing to improve standing balance in children cerebral palsy spastic diplegia.Keywords: trunk control, cerebral palsy spastic diplegia, standing balance. AbstrakTujuan: Mengetahui pengaruh penambahan trunk control exercise dengan latihan di standing frame dan latihan di standing frame terhadap keseimbangan berdiri anak cp spastic diplegia. Metode: Penelitian eksperimental untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari suatu intervensi terhadap subyek penelitian. Sampel terdiri dari 20 anak cp spastic diplegia usia 3-10 tahun, penelitian selama 6 minggu 3x dalam 1 minggu. Sampel dikelompokan menjadi dua kelompok. Kelompok pertama (n = 10) dan perlakuan ke dua (n = 10). Hasil: Hasil uji hipotesis pada kelompok perlakuan pertama dengan t-test related didapatkan nilai p=0,001. Pada kelompok perlakuan ke dua dengan t-test related nilai p=0,002. Pada hasil uji t-test independent menunjukan nilai p=0,302. Pada kelompok perlakuan I didapatkan hasil pada uji mean = 15,95 dan SD = 18,9. Pada kelompok perlakuan II didapatkan hasil pada uji mean = 15,45 dan SD = 17,25. Kesimpulan: Tidak ada perbedaan pengaruh antara pemberian trunk control exercise dengan latihan di standing frame dan latihan di standing frame dalam meningkatkan keseimbangan berdiri anak cp spastic diplegia.Kata kunci: Trunk control, cp spastic diplegia, keseimbangan berdiri
HUBUNGAN CORE STABILITY DAN POWER, SPEED SERTA AGILITY PADA PEMAIN BASKET USIA 15-16 TAHUN
Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 16, No 2 (2016): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/fisio.v16i2.1705

Abstract

AbstractObjective: Determine relationship of core stability and power, speed and also agility in basketball players aged 15-16 years. Methods: This study is a non-experimental research in the form of correlation studies to analyze the relationship between variables. Sample consisted of 37 basketball players aged 15-16 years in SMAN 112, SMAN 78 and Cakrawala basketball club Jakarta. Samples are given a series of tests consisting of McGill's Procedure, vertical jump test, 40 yards dash test and t-run agility test. Results: Result from McGill’s Prosedure mean±SD= 369,60±139,24, vertical jump test 50,38±8,15, 40 yards dash test 5,32±0,44 and t-run agility test 10,58±0,88. Result from Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that all of data are normally distributed. Result from correlation test using Pearson product moment showed that relationship between core stability-power r= 0,436, core stability-speed r= -0,341 and core stability-agility r= -0,514. Result from hypothesis test using T-test showed that core stability-power thitung= 2,866, core stability-speed thitung= 2,1460 dan core stability-agility thitung= 3,544. Value of thitung are compared to ttable and showed that thitung> ttabel (1,687), it means there is any relationship between each variable. Conclusion: There is a relationship between core stability and power, speed and also agility in 15-16 years old basketball players.Keywords: core stability, power, speed, agility, basketball player. AbstrakTujuan: Mengetahui hubungan core stability dan power, speed serta agility pada pemain basket usia 15-16 tahun. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian non eksperimental berupa studi korelasi untuk menganalisa hubungan antar variabel. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 37 orang pemain basketusia 15-16 tahun yang berasal dari kelompok basket SMAN 112, SMAN 78 dan klub Cakrawala Jakarta. Sampel diberikan serangkaian pengukuran berupaMcGill’s procedure, vertical jump test, 40 yards dash test dan t-run agility test.Hasil:Hasil pengukuran McGill’s Procedure diperoleh data berupa mean±SD = 369,60±139,24, vertical jump test 50,38±8,15, 40 yards dash test 5,32±0,44 dan t-run agility test 10,58±0,88. Hasil uji normalitas dengan Kolmogorov-Smirnov test didapatkan seluruh data berdistribusi normal. Hasil uji korelasi dengan Pearson product moment test didapatkan hasil untuk hubungan core stability-power r= 0,436, core stability-speed r= -0,341 dan core stability-agility r= -0,514. Hasil uji hipotesis dengan uji T didapatkan hasil untuk hubungan core stability-powerthitung= 2,866, core stability-speed thitung= 2,1460 dan core stability-agility thitung= 3,544. Nilai thitung dibandingkan dengan nilai ttabel, hasil perbandingan menunjukkan seluruh hasil thitung > ttabel (1,687) yang berarti terdapat korelasi antar variabel.Kesimpulan: Terdapat hubungan antara core stability dan power, speed serta agility pada pemain basket usia 15-16 tahun.Kata Kunci: core stability, power, speed, agility, pemain basket.
PERBEDAAN NILAI VO2 MAX ANTARA AKTIVITAS FISIK RENDAH DAN AKTIVITAS FISIK TINGGI PADA LANSIA PENDERITA OSTEOARTHRITIS LUTUT
Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 16, No 2 (2016): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Esa Unggul

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/fisio.v16i2.1704

Abstract

AbstractObjective: To determine differences in VO2 max values between low physical activity and high physical activity in elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional study to determine VO2 max value differences between low physical activity and high physical activity in elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The sample consisted of 40 elderly and selected based on purposive sampling technique. Samples were grouped into two groups based on their level of physical activity that lower levels of physical activity group consists of 20 people and the high activity group consisted of 20 people. Measurement of physical activity using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) and the measurement of VO2 max using the Six Minute Walking Test. Results : The results of the measurement of lower levels of physical activity by using the total sample of 20 people, showed that the mean value for Physical Activity Low PASE is 131.5 with a standard deviation of 7.45160, while for the measurement of VO2 Max showed a mean value of VO2 Max is 18 , 66 with a standard deviation of 0.52661. High Physical Activity measurement results with a sample size of 20 people, showed that the mean value for Physical Activity High PASE is 156.75 with a standard deviation of 8.47209, while for the measurement of VO2 Max showed a mean value for VO2 max was 19.45 with a standard deviation of 0.35019. Normality Test Results obtained by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normal data at lower levels of physical activity, VO2 max and abnormal data at high physical activity. On the results using a different test Test Independent Sample T-Test showed the value of p = 0.000, which means there is a difference VO2 max values between low and high physical activity in elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Conclusion: There is a difference VO2 max value between low physical activity and high physical activity in elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Keywords: VO2 max, Physical Activity  AbstrakTujuan: Untuk mengetahui perbedaan nilai VO2 maks antara aktivitas fisik rendah dan aktivitas fisik tinggi pada lansia penderita osteoarthritis lutut. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian cross sectional untuk mengetahui perbedaan nilai VO2 maks antara aktivitas fisik rendah dan aktivitas fisik tinggi pada lansia penderita osteoarthritis lutut. Sampel terdiri dari 40 orang lansia dan dipilih berdasarkan teknik purposive sampling. Sampel dikelompokkan menjadi dua kelompok berdasarkan tingkat aktivitas fisik yaitu kelompok aktivitas fisik rendah terdiri dari 20 orang dan kelompok aktivitas tinggi terdiri dari 20 orang. Pengukuran aktivitas fisik menggunakan Physical Activity Scale for Elderly (PASE) dan pengukuran VO2 maks menggunakan Six Minute Walking Test. Hasil: Hasil pengukuran aktivitas fisik rendah menunjukkan bahwa nilai mean PASE untuk Aktivitas Fisik Rendah adalah 131,5 dengan standar deviasi 7,45160, sedangkan untuk hasil pengukuran VO2 Maks menunjukkan nilai mean untuk VO2 Maks 18,66 dengan standar deviasi 0,52661. Hasil pengukuran Aktivitas Fisik menunjukkan bahwa nilai mean PASE untuk Aktivitas Fisik Tinggi 156,75 dengan standar deviasi 8,47209, sedangkan untuk hasil pengukuran VO2 Maks menunjukkan nilai mean untuk VO2 Maks adalah 19,45 dengan standar deviasi 0,35019. Hasil Uji Normalitas berdasarkan Uji Kolmogorov Smirnov didapatkan data normal pada aktivitas fisik rendah, VO2 maks dan data tidak normal pada aktivitas fisik tinggi. Pada hasil uji beda p = 0,000 yang berarti ada perbedaan nilai VO2 maks antara aktivitas fisik rendah dan tinggi pada lansia penderita osteoarthritis lutut. Kesimpulan: Ada perbedaan nilai VO2 maks antara aktivitas fisik rendah dan aktivitas fisik tinggi pada lansia penderita osteoarthritis lutut. Kata Kunci : VO2 maks, Aktivitas Fisik

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 22, No 02 (2022): FISIOTERAPI: JURNAL ILMIAH FISIOTERAPI Vol 22, No 01 (2022): FISIOTERAPI: JURNAL ILMIAH FISIOTERAPI Vol 21, No 02 (2021): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 21, No 01 (2021): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 20, No 2 (2020): Fisioterapi: Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 20, No 1 (2020): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 19, No 2 (2019): FISIOTERAPI : JURNAL ILMIAH FISIOTERAPI Vol 19, No 1 (2019): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 18, No 2 (2018): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 18, No 1 (2018): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 17, No 2 (2017): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 17, No 1 (2017): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 16, No 2 (2016): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 16, No 1 (2016): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 15, No 2 (2015): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 15, No 1 (2015): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 14, No 2 (2014): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 13, No 2 (2013): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 13, No 1 (2013): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 12, No 1 (2012): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 11, No 1 (2011): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 9, No 2 (2009): Fisioterapi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisioterapi Vol 9, No 1 (2009) Vol 8, No 2 (2008) Vol 8, No 1 (2008) Vol 7, No 2 (2007) Vol 7, No 1 (2007) Vol 6, No 2 (2006) Vol 6, No 1 (2006) Vol 5, No 2 (2005) Vol 5, No 1 (2005) More Issue