cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Pandecta
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Terbit dua kali setahun bulan Januari dan Juli. Berisi tulisan yang diangkat dari hasil penelitian dan kajian analitis kritis di bidang Ilmu Hukum
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 14 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 14, No 2 (2019): December" : 14 Documents clear
Penyelesaian Masalah Hak Asasi Manusia Masa Lalu dan Rekonsiliasi Nasional di Indonesia
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 14, No 2 (2019): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v14i2.21044

Abstract

Penyelesaian masalah Hak Asasi Masnusia (HAM) masa lalu merupakan proses dimana pelaku pelanggaran HAM diadili demi terciptanya keadilan secara hukum dan sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis latar belakang dalam penyelesaian HAM masa lalu dan rekonsiliasi nasional di Indonesia. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan, bahwa penyelesaian HAM masa lalu dilakukan melalui tiga model penyelesaian, yaitu to forget and to forgive (melupakan dan memaafkan; artinya, tidak ada pengadilan dan lupakan masa lalu). Selanjutnya adalah“never to forget, never to forgive”, (tidak melupakan dan tidak memaafkan). Artinya, peristiwa masa lalu akan tetap diproses secara hukum. Terakhir adalah never to forget but to forgive” (tidak melupakan, tetapi kemudian memaafkan. Artinya, ungkapkan terlebih dulu, sampaikan kebenaran, kemudian ampuni). Penyelesaian model ini merupakan bentuk kompromi.The resolution of the problem of Human Rights (HAM) in the past is a process in which perpetrators of human rights violations are tried for the creation of legal and social justice. This study aims to analyze the background in the past settlement of human rights and national reconciliation in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the settlement of past human rights is carried out through three settlement models, namely to forget and to forgive (meaning there is no trial and forget the past). Next is “never to forget, never to forgive” (meaning that is, past events will still be processed legally). Finally, never to forget but to forgive ”(meaning that is, express first, convey the truth, then forgive). Completion of this model is a form of compromise. 
Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Reklamasi Pantai yang Berkeadilan Sosial di Indonesia
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 14, No 2 (2019): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v14i2.20622

Abstract

Potensi lahan reklamasi pantai di Indonesia dilakukan dengan mengali sumber daya alam dan sumber daya manusia dalam pengelolaan pesisir untuk kesejahteraan masyarakat sekitar. Sejak berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintah Daerah, kewenangan laut dan pesisir pantai menjadi kewenangan Pemerintah Provinsi, sehingga kewenangan dan pengawasan dari pemerintah daerah berkurang. Hal ini sangat berpengaruh bagi kehidupan masyarakat pesisir.Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui potensi lahan reklamasi pantai di Indonesia yang berkelanjutan dan merekonstruksi kebijakan reklamasi pantai yang berkeadilan. Penelitian ini secara garis besar dapat dikelompokkan kedalam ranah pendekatan Social Legal. Di dalam hal ini terdapat dua aspek penelitian, yaitu aspek legal research, yakni obyek penelitian tetap ada yang berupa hukum dalam arti “norm” dan socio research, yaitu digunakannya metode dan teori teori ilmu sosial tentang hukum.Hasil penelitian bahwa potensi lahan reklamasi pantai sebagian besar adalah untuk pengembangan usaha dan kawasan wisata untuk kesejahteraan masyarakat sekitar. Rekonstruksi kebijakan reklamasi pantai yang berkeadilan sosial di Indonesia dilakukan dengan merekonstruksi nilai kebijakan berupa pembuatan kebijakan yang melibatkan masyarakat secara genuine dan merekonstruksi hukum kebijakan peraturan perundang-undangan yang masih berlaku. The potential of coastal reclamation land in Indonesia is done by multiplying natural resources and human resources for coastal management for the welfare of the surrounding community. Since the enactment of Law Number 32 Year 2014 concerning Regional Government, the authority of the sea and the coast has become the authority of the Provincial Government, so that the authority and supervision of the regional government is reduced. This is very influential for the lives of coastal communities.The aim of the study was to determine the potential of coastal reclamation land in Indonesia that is sustainable and to reconstruct a fair coastal reclamation policy. This research can broadly be grouped into the realm of the Social Legal approach. In this case there are two aspects of research, namely the legal research aspect, namely the object of research that still exists in the form of law in the sense of “norm” and social research, namely the use of methods and theories of social science theory about law.Based on the results of the study that the potential of coastal reclamation land is mostly for business development and tourist areas for the welfare of the surrounding community. Reconstruction of the coastal justice social reclamation policy in Indonesia is done by reconstructing the value of policies in the form of policy that involves the community genuinely and reconstructing the prevailing legal policy regulations.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kekerasan yang Dilakukan oleh Penyidik
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 14, No 2 (2019): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v14i2.17212

Abstract

Crime is an act that violates the prohibitions set out in the rule of law, and does not fulfill or go against the orders set out in the rules of law that apply in society. For human interests to be protected, laws must be implemented in accordance with applicable regulations. However, there are often violations of the law, even at the level of law enforcement officials themselves. The Criminal Procedure Code does not explicitly regulate sanctions for law enforcement officials who commit violence or other practices that violate the provisions therein. The method used is juridical normative to explain sanctions for law enforcement officers who violate the Criminal Procedure Code in dealing with crime.Crime is a prohibition set out in the rule of law, and is not in accordance with the orders set out in the rule of law that applies in society. For human interests to be protected, laws must be applied in accordance with applicable regulations. However, various lawsuits were dropped, even at the level of law enforcement itself. The Criminal Procedure Code (Indonesian : KUHAP)does not emphasize sanctions for law enforcement officials who commit violent practices or other practices that conflict with the provisions therein. The purpose of this study is to study law enforcement sanctions that are against the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in dealing with crime.
Asas Keseimbangan dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana yang Berkeadilan
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 14, No 2 (2019): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v14i2.17596

Abstract

Konsep keseimbangan menjadi ide pembaharuan dalam hukum pidana saat ini. KUHP yang berlaku selama ini masih belum mampu memberikan keadilan dikarenakan masih berorientasi pada nilai-nilai hukum kolonial, belum bersumber pada Pancasila. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan tipe penelitian doktrinal dengan pendekatan perundangan serta pendekatan konsep. Pada akhirnya, dalam memaknai hukum yang berkeadilan harus memiliki konsep keseimbangan yang diharapkan mampu menjadi solusi. Asas keseimbangan dalam tujuan pemidanaan adalah untuk membina pelaku dan membebaskan rasa bersalah pelaku, disamping itu juga bertujuan untuk mencegah dilakukan tindak pidana dengan menegakkan hukum, menyelesaikan konflik yang ditimbulkan oleh tindak pidana, memulihkan keseimbangan dan mendatangkan rasa damai dalam masyarakat.The concept of balance is a renewal idea in the current criminal law. The Criminal Code that has been in force so far has not been able to provide justice because it is still oriented to the values of colonial law, not yet based on Pancasila. This research is legal research using the type of doctrinal research with the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. In the end, in interpreting the law with justice, it must have a concept of balance that expected to be a solution. The principle of balance in the goal of punishment is to foster the perpetrators and free the guilty while also aiming to prevent criminal offenses by enforcing the law, resolving conflicts caused by criminal acts, restoring balance, and bringing a sense of peace in society.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14