cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
MOHAMMAD ALVI PRATAMA
Contact Email
alvi.pratama@unpas.ac.id
Phone
+62224-217343
Journal Mail Official
litigasi@unpas.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Lengkong Besar 68 Bandung 40261 Jawa Barat.
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal)
Published by Universitas Pasundan
ISSN : 08537100     EISSN : 24422274     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/litigasi
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) is a peer-review journal with vision to develop law and harmony between Indonesian positive law and the reality in the society. JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) aims to 1. Actively participate in national development and reformation of law; 2. Take part in educating higher education and legal profession in Indonesia; 3. Provide information on development of law in Indonesia 4. Enlight people in order to improve people’s knowledge of law JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) is published by Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan. LITIGASI covers articles on science of law, legal theories, legal philosophy, social study on law with latest and actual substances. LITIGASI publishes original and scientific articles whose values of novelty in the form of Research findings, Articles, Reviews, and Book Review.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 16 No 2 (2015)" : 6 Documents clear
MINIMALISASI SENGKETA MEDIK PASIEN DAN TENAGA KESEHATAN DIHUBUNG KAN DENGAN UNDANG - UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Toto Tohir Suriaatmadja
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 16 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (235.476 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v16i2.45

Abstract

A person can be called or categorized as patient based on the definition of Medical Practice Act if meeting the elements: undergoing the health consultation; with the purpose to get medical service; consultation and medical service to doctors or dentists. Clearly that individual taken the consultation and or treatment from the paramedics is not categorized as patient; in other word, only doctors or dentists deal with the patient; or only doctors and dentists who have patients. Other than that, they cannot be called patients. For this, the writer is interested in analyzing the what to call those who meet the first and second elements but not to the doctor, for example, to midwife or nurse. It needs clear answer to protect the patient under a clear legal basis. The importance of the answers is to assure that individuals can be called patient based on the existing definition, consequently, it makes individuals, consulting or asking for medical service from paramedics other than doctors and dentists, are not patients. This statement is supported with the provision under Health Act that does not at all define the term patient. In fact, hierarchically the Health Act is the umbrella law regarding health issues in Indonesia.Keyword: Medical dispute; patient; paramedicsABSTRAKSeseorang dapat disebut atau dikatagorikan sebagai pasien berdasarkan Rumusan Undang-Undang Praktik Kedokteran, apabila memenuhi  unsur-unsur : melakukan konsultasi kesehatan; dengan maksud memperoleh pelayanan kesehatan; konsultasi dan layanan kesehatan tersebut kepada dokter atau dokter gigi. Jelaslah bahwa seseorang yang melakukan konsultasi dan atau pengobatan kepada tenaga kesehatan yang bukan dokter atau dokter gigi tidak termasuk katagori pasien; dengan perkataan lain yang berhadapan dengan pasien hanya dokter atau dokter gigi atau hanya dokter dan dokter gigi yang mempunyai pasien. Di luar dari itu, tidak dapat disebut pasien. Terhadap hal ini penulis tertarik untuk menganalisa, apa sebutan bagi mereka yang memenuhi unsur ke satu dan kedua tetapi bukan kepada dokter, misalnya kepada bidan atau perawat. Hal ini  perlu mendapat jawaban  yang jelas agar perlindungan terhadap pasien mempunyai landasan hukum yang jelas. Kepentingan jawaban atas pertanyaan tersebut untuk memastikan bahwa seseorang dapat disebut pasien karena dari definisi yang ada menyebabkan seseorang yang berkonsultasi atau meminta layanan kesehatan kepada tenga kesehatan di luar dokter dan dokter gigi bukan pasien. Hal ini diperkuat dengan isi Undang-Undang Kesehatan yang sama sekali tidak memberikan pengertian tentang pasien. Padahal secara hirarki Undang-Undang Kesehatan merupakan payung bagi undang-undang lainnya yang berhubungan dengan urusan kesehatan di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Sengketa Medik; Pasien; Tenaga Kesehatan
KEMANDIRIAN DESA DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PEMBANGUNAN KAWASAN PEDESAAN Berna Sudjana Ermaya
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 16 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (356.847 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v16i2.36

Abstract

The village government is essentially an autonomous government with tradition, democratic, real, and a very strong custom. However, in existing policies, the village placed only as an object of sheer power. Pursuant to Article 91 of Act No. 06 Year 2014 on the village, the village can be entered into a collaboration with other villages and or collaboration with third parties. Cooperation between the village become important, where the village has its limitations and the emergence of gaps between villages, so not all villages have the same ability to manage governance and development. District limitations in carrying out public services and development can reach all villages in the region, due to geographical and others. Based on these two things, we need some kind of bridging the space between the limitations of the village so it opens a large space for the village to take the initiative and creativity of the village so rural development can be realized. Keyword: village; Authority; Cooperation.
PENGEMBALIAN ASET TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PELAKU DAN AHLI WARISNYA MENURUT SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA DALAM MEWUJUDKAN NEGARA HUKUM KESEJAHTERAAN Haswandi Haswandi
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 16 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (304.992 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v16i2.44

Abstract

Criminal laws regulating asset recovery of corruption today experience a paradigm oversight since it only relies on the money substitute in corruption under Article 18 of Law No. 31, 1999 concerning The Eradication of The Crime of Corruption as amended with the Law No. 20, 2001 in which asset recovery is addressed only to the convict. In fact, modus to cover up the proceed of corruption usually involves the family, close relatives or confidants including the heirs. The obstacle in recovering the asset is that civil lawsuit is not yet effective as the means to recover the asset, the organization of law enforcement, the ratification of 2003 UNCAC that is also not yet effectively implemented in Indonesian law, and the laws against corruption that are weak. Future concept of law in asset recovery of proceed of corruption by the culprit and the heirs in order to materialize a legal welfare state should at least done through progressive laws i.e. reformation of law, optimization of Mutual Legal Assistance, the widening of authority implemented by the Eradication Commission of Corruption in recovering the asset as the proceed of corruption, the strong inter-agency coordination of law enforcements, and the urgency to promulgate the Recovery Asset Act.Keyword: Recovery; Proceed of Corruption; HeirsABSTRAKPerangkat hukum pidana dalam mengembalikan aset hasil tindak pidana korupsi pada saat ini mengalami kekeliruan paradigma karena hanya mengandalkan uang pengganti kejahatan korupsi yang terkandung dalam Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001, di mana Pengembalian harta atau kekayaan hanya ditujukan kepada terpidana. Padahal modus menyembunyikan harta kekayaan hasil korupsi biasanya dengan menggunakan sanak keluarga, kerabat dekat atau orang kepercayaannya termasuk para ahli warisnya. Hambatan pengembalian aset tindak pidana korupsi disebabkan belum efektifnya gugatan perdata sebagai sarana untuk mengembalikan aset hasil kejahatan korupsi, kelembagaan penegak hukum, belum efektifnya Ratifikasi UNCAC 2003 dilaksanakan dalam hukum Indonesia, serta kelemahan di ranah regulasi tindak pidana korupsi. Konsep hukum mendatang dalam pengembalian aset tindak pidana korupsi pelaku dan ahli warisnya dalam mewujudkan negara hukum kesejahteraan, setidaknya ditempuh dalam beberapa langkah hukum progresif, yakni perbaikan regulasi peraturan perundang-undangan, optimalisasi Bantuan Hukum Timbal Balik, Perluasan kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Pengembalian Aset hasil tindak pidana korupsi, Penguatan koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum, serta menyegerakan menyelesaikan Undang-Undang Pengembalian Aset.Kata Kunci: Pengembalian; Aset Korupsi; Ahli Waris 
PENYERAPAN ISTILAH ASING PADA TERMINOLOGI HUKUM DI INDONESIA Ira Thania Rasjidi
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 16 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (355.939 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v16i2.37

Abstract

Absorption of foreign terms and terminology of today become a problem because it is not adapted to the rules of Indonesian enhanced (EYD). Additionally rigid legal language and multiple interpretations. By using the method of normative legal research analyzed data that was obtained from the library. As a result, the absorption of foreign terms are acceptable, facilitate relations in the international arena. Keyword: Absorption; Terminology; Legal; Glossary; Foreign.
KONSEP SISTEM HUKUM INVESTASI DALAM MENJAMIN ADANYA KEPASTIAN HUKUM Jaja Ahmad Jayus
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 16 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (194.868 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v16i2.38

Abstract

The problems investiment in Indonesia one of them is the issue of legal certainty. The problem arises both because of the disharmony of law and issues related to synchronization. Whereas the issue of legal certainty is expected by each investor, it is because the investment related to the expected future profits. Hence the need for the arrangement of the law, as well as services. Structuring services should also be coupled with the arrangement of its legal system. Therefore, the concept of the legal system of investment should cover the legal structuring of investment and related legislation, such as the problem of labor laws, licensing laws that encourage certainty and protection for the survival of an investment. Keyword: Investment Law; Legal Certainty; Licensing Law System ABSTRAK Problem investasi di Indonesia salah satunya adalah persoalan kepastian hukum. Problem itu muncul baik karena terjadinya disharmonisasi perundang-undangan yang terkait maupun persoalan sinkronisasi. Padahal persoalan kepastian hukum merupakan hal yang diharapkan oleh setiap investor, hal tersebut karena investasi berkaitan dengan keuntungan yang diharapkan dimasa datang. Oleh karenanya perlu adanya penataan dari sisi peraturan perundang-undangan, maupun pelayanan. Penataan pelayanan perlu juga dibarengi dengan penataan sistem hukumnya. Oleh karenanya konsep sistem hukum investasi harus mencakup penataan hukum investasi dan undang-undang yang berkaitan, seperti persoalan hukum perburuhan, hukum perizinan yang mendorong adanya kepastian dan perlindungan bagi kelangsungan investasi. Kata Kunci: Hukum Investasi; Kepastian Hukum; Hukum Perizinan
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG SPPA: IMPLIKASINYA BAGI PEKERJAAN SOSIAL Edi Suharto
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 16 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (316.088 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v16i2.39

Abstract

Act No. 11 Year 2012 on the Juvenile Justice Systemthat now come into force, grounded in the concept of restorative justice. Restorative justice is the completion of the criminal case together relevant parties in order to seek a fair settlement with the emphasis on restoring back to its original state. To achieve this restorative justice efforts for settling disputes diversion or transfer of children from the criminal justice process to the outside of the criminal justice process. At this diversion efforts have implications for social work. If previously a social worker who has a small role for children in conflict with the law (ABH), it is now a greater role. So it is necessary to enhance the quality and quantity of social workers. Improved quality and quantity must be followed by efforts such as education and training. Institutional quality of social welfare services should also be strengthened because it is the institution that will hold ABH when diversion efforts agreed by the parties.Keyword: Restorative Justice; Diversion; Social Workers ABSTRAKUU SPPA yang sekarang mulai berlaku, berpijak pada paradigma restorative justice. Restorative justice merupakan penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana bersama-sama pihak terkait dalam rangka mencari penyelesaian yang adil dengan menekankan pemulihan kembali pada keadaan semula. Untuk mencapai keadilan restoratif ini dilakukan upaya diversi atau pengalihan penyelesaian perkara anak dari proses peradilan pidana ke proses di luar peradilan pidana. Pada upaya diversi inilah memiliki dampak bagi pekerjaan sosial. Jika sebelumnya pekerja sosial mempunyai peranan yang kecil kepada anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum (ABH), maka kini peranannya lebih besar. Sehingga dibutuhkan peningkatan kualitas maupun kuantitas. Peningkatan kualitas maupun kuantitas harus diikuti dengan upaya seperti pendidikan dan pelatihan. Kualitas kelembagaan pelayanan kesejahteraan sosial juga harus diperkuat karena lembaga inilah yang akan menampung ABH ketika upaya diversi disepakati para pihak.Kata Kunci: Restoratif Justice; Diversi; Pekerja Sosial

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 26 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 26 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 25 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 25 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 24 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 23 No. 2 (2022) Vol 23 No 1 (2022) Vol 22 No 2 (2021) Vol 22 No 1 (2021) Vol 21 No 2 (2020) Vol 21 No 1 (2020) Vol 20 No 2 (2019) Vol 20 No 1 (2019) Vol 19 No 2 (2018) Vol 19 No 1 (2018) Vol 18 No 2 (2017) Vol 18 No 1 (2017) Vol 17 No 2 (2016) Vol 17 No 1 (2016) Vol 16 No 2 (2015) Vol 16 No 1 (2015) Vol 15 No 2 (2014) Vol 15 No 1 (2014) Vol 14 No 2 (2013) Vol 14 No 1 (2013) More Issue