cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
'ADALAH
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
ADALAH is “one of the ten most influential law journals in the world, based on research influence and impact factors,” in the Journal Citation Reports. ADALAH also publishes student-written work.Adalah publishes pieces on recent developments in law and reviews of new books in the field. Past student work has been awarded the International Law Students Association’s Francis Deak Prize for the top student-written article published in a student-edited international law journal.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 6 (2019): Philosophy of State" : 5 Documents clear
Philosophy of State: The Social Contract and the Separation of Powers according to John Locke Nur Rohim Yunus
ADALAH Vol 3, No 6 (2019): Philosophy of State
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v3i6.31378

Abstract

The social contract is a reasoned agreement regarding the authority of governmental authorities and the extent of social freedom. To further improve justice and achieve high morals, a social contract based on the free will of all was established. Yet, according to John Locke, the social compact is a motivating factor in the shape of a desire to avoid interference, in which the individual surrenders no important natural rights to the society, but simply the right to implement natural law. Individuals' submitted rights are not granted to individuals or groups, but rather to the entire community. So, the nature of government is limited power, political authority is borrowed, and power is constrained by the government's own objectives, notably the protection of fundamental human rights. Moreover, John Locke encouraged the separation of powers in a nation, so that it does not rely on a single power.
Philosophy of State: Leviathan and State Power according to Thomas Hobbes Nur Rohim Yunus
ADALAH Vol 3, No 6 (2019): Philosophy of State
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v3i6.31380

Abstract

One of the most influential philosophers in history is Thomas Hobbes, who lived in Great Britain during the 17th century. Hobbes is a supporter of social contract ethics, which is the idea that the moral and political obligations of individuals depend on contracts or agreements between them to form the community where they live. During his life, Hobbes published many different works about political theory, philosophy, and history. The most famous work written by Thomas Hobbes was "Leviathan", written in 1651 in response to the British civil war, which resulted in the formation of a parliamentary system and reducing monarchy power. Although Hobbes rejected the King's divine rights to govern his citizens. But in Leviathan's theory he stated that to guarantee shared salvation, an agreement needs to be made and eliminating the absolute natural rights of humans. You do this by creating political authority that has coercive power (absolute power) to force people to submit to social agreements. Where the agreement was carried out between humans, they surrendered all of their sovereignty to The Sovereign (Public Authority).
Philosophy of State: Social Action and State Power according to Max Weber Nur Rohim Yunus
ADALAH Vol 3, No 6 (2019): Philosophy of State
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v3i6.31373

Abstract

Max Weber was a sociologist known for his theoretical approach to "Social Action". Max Weber's methodology differed from structural theorists such as Émile Durkheim and Karl Marx in that he used this form of social action analysis. In his view, social action is the recognition that individual action is directed by certain motives and goals. An action has a subjectivity of meaning and can affect other people, so that it has a subjectivity of meaning for both oneself and others. Power, in contrast, is defined as the ability to carry out the will of someone who opposes it in a social setting, regardless of the source of that ability.
Philosophy of State: Social Solidarity and Social Order of a country according to Emile Durkheim Nur Rohim Yunus
ADALAH Vol 3, No 6 (2019): Philosophy of State
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v3i6.31377

Abstract

In 1858, Emile Durkheim presented a sociological theory of the concept of solidarity. According to Durkheim, solidarity is a bond between individuals and/or groups based on moral values and beliefs, which are developed from shared emotional experiences. Solidarity stresses the state of interaction between individuals and organizations and serves as the basis for a common bond in life that is supported by the moral standards and beliefs of society. The real realization of a partnership will evoke emotional experiences that will strengthen the partnership. Simple civilization has grown into a modern society. Primitive society's social solidarity is different from modern society's solidarity.
The Dilemma of Legal Sovereignty in a Country in a Philosophical Dimension Yunus, Nur Rohim
ADALAH Vol 3, No 6 (2019): Philosophy of State
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v3i6.45660

Abstract

Esai ini membahas secara mendalam dilema kedaulatan hukum dalam negara modern dari perspektif filosofis, menyoroti ketegangan antara penegakan hukum, hak asasi manusia, dan kekuasaan negara. Dalam konteks negara modern, kedaulatan hukum seharusnya menjamin supremasi hukum yang adil dan mengatur kekuasaan negara agar tidak bertindak sewenang-wenang (Locke, 1689). Namun, dalam praktiknya, sering kali terjadi penyalahgunaan hukum sebagai alat legitimasi kekuasaan, terutama dalam situasi darurat yang mengancam keberlangsungan negara (Schmitt, 1922; Agamben, 2005).Esai ini mengupas paradoks antara kedaulatan hukum dan hak asasi manusia dalam negara demokratis, di mana negara berhak membatasi hak individu demi keamanan nasional, namun berisiko melanggar prinsip-prinsip keadilan (Schmitt, 1922). Dari sudut pandang postmodernisme, kedaulatan hukum dikritik sebagai instrumen dominasi negara terhadap masyarakat, dengan hukum digunakan untuk mengontrol dan menormalisasi perilaku individu (Foucault, 1977).Selain itu, globalisasi dan kemajuan teknologi turut mempersulit penerapan kedaulatan hukum karena pengaruh kuat dari hukum internasional dan tantangan yurisdiksi lintas negara (Habermas, 1998). Esai ini menawarkan solusi filosofis dengan mengintegrasikan prinsip demokrasi konstitusional yang mengedepankan checks and balances serta kesadaran akan kedaulatan Tuhan yang menuntut hukum ditegakkan berdasarkan prinsip moral dan keadilan universal (Rawls, 1971; Al-Attas, 1993).Dengan pendekatan filosofis ini, esai ini mengusulkan transformasi kedaulatan hukum dari sekadar instrumen negara menjadi kesadaran etis yang menghormati nilai-nilai keadilan hakiki.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 6 (2025) Vol 9, No 6 (2025) Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025) Vol 8, No 6 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 6 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 5 (2024) Vol 8, No 5 (2024) Vol 8, No 4 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024) Vol 8, No 3 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024) Vol 8, No 1 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 6 (2023) Vol 7, No 6 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 5 (2023) Vol 7, No 5 (2023) Vol 7, No 4 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023) Vol 7, No 3 (2023) Vol 7, No 2 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023) Vol 7, No 1 (2023) Vol 6, No 6 (2022) Vol 6, No 5 (2022) Vol 6, No 4 (2022) Vol 6, No 3 (2022) Vol 6, No 2 (2022) Vol 6, No 1 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2021) Vol 5, No 6 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2021) Vol 5, No 5 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2021) Vol 5, No 4 (2021) Vol 5, No 3 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021) Vol 5, No 2 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021) Vol 5, No 1 (2021) Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Coronavirus Covid-19 Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Spesial Issue Covid-19 Vol 4, No 4 (2020): Keadilan Masyarakat Vol 4, No 3 (2020): Keadilan Hukum & Pemerintahan Vol 4, No 2 (2020): Keadilan Sosial & Politik Vol 3, No 6 (2019): Philosophy of State Vol. 3 No. 6 (2019): Philosophy of State Vol. 3 No. 5 (2019): Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Rusia Vol 3, No 5 (2019): Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Rusia Vol. 3 No. 4 (2019): Keadilan Sosial & Politik Vol 3, No 4 (2019): Keadilan Sosial & Politik Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019): Keadilan Budaya & Masyarakat Vol 3, No 3 (2019): Keadilan Budaya & Masyarakat Vol 3, No 2 (2019): Keadilan Negara & Konstitusi Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): Keadilan Negara & Konstitusi Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Keadilan Hukum & Pemerintahan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Keadilan Hukum & Pemerintahan Vol 2, No 11 (2018) Vol 2, No 10 (2018) Vol 2, No 9 (2018) Vol 2, No 8 (2018) Vol 2, No 7 (2018) Vol 2, No 6 (2018) Vol 2, No 5 (2018) Vol 2, No 4 (2018) Vol 2, No 3 (2018) Vol 2, No 2 (2018) Vol 2, No 1 (2018) Vol 1, No 12 (2017) Vol 1, No 11 (2017) Vol 1, No 10 (2017) Vol 1, No 9 (2017) Vol 1, No 8 (2017) Vol 1, No 7 (2017) Vol 1, No 6 (2017) Vol 1, No 5 (2017) Vol 1, No 4 (2017) Vol 1, No 3 (2017) Vol 1, No 2 (2017) Vol 1, No 1 (2017) More Issue