cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mochammad Faisal Karim
Contact Email
mkarim@binus.edu
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jas@binus.edu
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies)
Published by Universitas Bina Nusantara
ISSN : 23381361     EISSN : 23381353     DOI : https://doi.org/10.21512/jas
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
The Journal of ASEAN Studies (JAS) is a peer-reviewed bi-annual journal that enriches understanding of the past, current, and future issues relevant to ASEAN and its circle of issues. The article shall address any research on theoretical and empirical questions about ASEAN. The Topics addressed within the journal include: diplomacy, political economy, trade, national development, security, geopolitics, social change, transnational movement, environment, law, business and industry, and other various related sub-fields. JAS expects the articles encourage debate, controversy, new understanding, solid theory, and reflection on ASEAN. The articles sent should have a sharp analysis and rigorous methodologies quantitative or qualitative as well as written in an engaging and analytical style. The JAS does publish original research, reviewing research, book review, opinion pieces of current affairs. However JAS does not publish journalistic or investigative style of article. The JAS would not be responsible for any implied or written statements of articles published. Each author would be responsible for their own writing.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies" : 7 Documents clear
A Value Chain Approach to Support Southeast Asian Economic Regionalism Craig Jones
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v7i1.5009

Abstract

This article includes an exploration of the economic data sets of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Statistics, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund, as well as primary regional economic initiatives and agreements to assess the strategic indicators of economic regionalism using thematic analysis. The aim of this research is to determine how Southeast Asian regionalism can circumvent vulnerabilities to another economic crisis in North America and the European Union. To correct such financial vulnerabilities, ASEAN has significantly remolded the region into a single market consisting of a 10-nation integrated production base. The ASEAN Economic Community’s main pillars are the establishment of a regional economic foundation based on comprehensive investment initiatives; the liberalization of capital markets, tariffs, and professional labor; infrastructure connectivity; regional policy integration; and free trade agreements to create a regional value chain as part of a single market and production base. The more attainable this comprehensive value-capture-and-integration process becomes, the more attractive it will appear to the global economic investment community and for business opportunities to establish a robust regional foundation. Although the process appears straightforward, capturing value is not a single phenomenon or method, but rather a multifaceted phenomenon, as explored in this study. The regional integration model seeks profitability within effective cross-border production networks and regional liberalization.
Business and Human Rights in ASEAN: Lessons from the Palm Oil Sector in Malaysia Andika AB. Wahab
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v7i1.5520

Abstract

The release of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in 2011 aims to address gaps in human rights governance by setting a standard and corporate culture of respecting human rights. As part of the state responsibility to implement these guiding principles, some member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have already embarked preliminary steps towards establishing their respective National Action Plan on Business and Human rights (NAPBHR), while others are still lag behind. This article describes current development on business and human rights in the region. Drawing from the palm oil sector’s experience in Malaysia, this study aims to provide lessons for ASEAN member states to contemplate when developing their NAPBHR. In this article, I argue that while some large palm oil companies have shown modest progress in realizing their human rights obligation, challenges emerge in many forms including the lack of leadership, collaboration and ambition to steer and scale up industry transformation on human rights across supply chain. Equally important, challenges around certification scheme depict that it is not the only solution in persuading respect to human rights. Meaningful values transfer often overlooked in certification practice resulting in typical "ticking the audit box" exercise without understanding principles behind it. As such, the development of NAPBHR among the ASEAN member states should reflect on these reality and challenges.
What Does ASEAN Economic Community Bring to Older Workers? Examining Inequality in Old Age in Thailand’s Fast-Ageing Society Wenqian Xu; Sikander Islam
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v7i1.5590

Abstract

The ASEAN Economic Community is envisaged to promote economic integration initiatives to create a single market across Southeast Asian member countries. It is acknowledged that the intergovernmental initiatives need to be accommodative to national and regional contexts. Thailand, as a pivotal and active partnership, endeavours to facilitate economic transformation and regional integration within the ASEAN and cope with population ageing in Thai society. Since Thailand has been the third most rapidly ageing country in the world, demographic changes pose new challenges for how to achieve persistent economic growth, productive employment and decent work. This article is based on a qualitative approach to investigate the emergent inequality within and across age cohorts shaped by the AEC structural forces, as well as utilizes reliable secondary data to formulate argumentation, including academic publications, policy analysis, scientific reports. We are particularly concerned about the heterogeneity and poverty in old age from the perspective of cumulative advantages/disadvantages. In conclusion, this article suggests policy recommendations of mitigating inequality in old age and advocates a critical lens to examine how political economic structure shapes older individuals in the labour market.
Beyond Brinkmanship: The Implication of South China Sea Conflicts on China’s Soft Power in Southeast Asia Randy Wirasta Nandyatama
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v7i1.5684

Abstract

While contemporary scholarly literatures on South China Sea conflicts have been dominated by hard power calculations, some other aspects remain under-researched. Rather underplayed in the existing literature is the question on the political implication of the conflicts on China’s soft power in the region. In responding to this issue, this article tries to carefully investigate the nature of the China’s soft power and the linkage between the increasing Chinese assertive measures in the South China Sea and the foundation of China’s soft power in the region. Through some cases of China’s skirmishes with Southeast Asian countries on the South China Sea between 2009 and 2012, this article argues that Beijing’s increasing hard power measures have induced growing threat perceptions in the region. This very context not only signals a distinct dissonance of Beijing’s image in Southeast Asia but also creates surging discontents and rejections to China’s role and political position in the region. Ultimately, China’s perceived inappropriate hard power measures affect its soft power, particularly in eroding the reputation of being a benign political entity as its source of soft power in Southeast Asia.
Repositioning Indonesia – Thoughts on the Indo-Pacific Anthony Milner
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v7i1.5748

Abstract

Before considering how best to reposition Indonesia in the world – and I will be looking, in particular, at Indonesia’s current Indo-Pacific initiative -  we need to ask how the world itself has been repositioned. The terms of reference for this conference go straight to this second question. They immediately highlight the theme of globalization, noting how it has promoted “growing connectivity among states” and “revolutionized human interaction”. How then has this region been reconfigured over the last decades? Until the mid-20th-century the entire Asian region was either under European colonial rule or strong Western imperial influence. That is how the region was structured – with the great centres of power in London, Paris, The Hague and Washington. After the extraordinary conquests by Japan, which effectively ended the Western imperial project, Asia was quickly drawn into the Cold War. Countries lined up as Communist or Anti-Communist, and some tried to sustain a degree of neutrality or equi-distance. At the end of the Cold War, in the last decade or so of the 20th-century, as is often commented, there was a unipolar moment – an America-dominated world with a sense of globalization not merely being economic, but also a globalization of ideas. One commentator wrote of the ‘end of history’ – the US had won, he said, with its liberal democratic ideology. Communism had been annihilated, and Western liberalism had the ‘wind in its hair’. This said, there were still objections. Dr Mahathir in Malaysia and a number of bright Foreign Ministry intellectuals in Singapore spoke of ‘Asian values’. They said you had to understand Asian values to explain the great economic transformation taking place in Asian countries – and there was also a need to respect Asian values in the political arena, and not just insist that all societies must develop in the same way. The democracy, human rights, and other supposed responsibilities of government which Westerners have tended to advocate, it was argued, are not necessarily universal norms.  
Understanding Sustainability-oriented Innovation (SOI) Using Network Perspective in Asia Pacific and ASEAN: A Systematic Review Budi Harsanto; Chrisna Permana
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v7i1.5756

Abstract

Sustainability-oriented innovation (SOI) is particular type of innovation that is not only economically oriented, but also environmental- and social benefits-oriented. SOI is now being widely discussed due to the increasing environmental and social problems that accompany various innovations around the world. In this paper we conducted a systematic review of empirical literature regarding SOI in the Asia Pacific region, which were discussed through network perspectives. For network perspectives, researchers focused on process view to explain how SOI is mobilised and practised throughout different social, institutional, and political contexts. We chose the Asia Pacific as the context because the region is the most dynamic part of the global economy, with ASEAN being the prominent parts of it. In conducting the review, we used the Tranfield, Denyer, & Smart's protocol (2003) to ensure its rigorousness. The search focused on the academic database of Scopus with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results show that SOI has been rapidly developing into practices in countries in the Asia Pacific, not only in profit sectors, but also in non-profit sectors such as government and community. Our review emphasised that actor-network theory (ANT) emerged as the currently most adopted framework to explain the dynamics process of SOI mobilisations and practices in the Asia Pacific region. ANT frameworks contribute to defining the structure of SOI networks as well as identifying social, institutional, and political challenges of SOI implementation. Regionally, the focus of the study so far is in North America (US and Canada), while studies in ASEAN are still very limited.
Editorial: Contextual Development in Southeast Asia Tirta Nugraha Mursitama
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v7i1.5861

Abstract

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 8, No 1 (2020): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 7, No 2 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 6, No 2 (2018): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 5, No 2 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 5, No 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2013): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Journal of ASEAN Studies More Issue