cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Achmad Nurmandi
Contact Email
nurmandi_achmad@ymail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jgp@umy.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. bantul,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
ISSN : 19078374     EISSN : 23378220     DOI : 10.18196/jgp
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Journal of Government and Politics ISBN:1907-8374 Online: 2337-8220 is the journal published biannually by the Department of Government Affairs and Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia collaborate with Asia Pacific Society For Public Affairs (APSPA) and Asosiasi Dosen Ilmu Pemerintahan Indonesia (ADIPSI). The journal aims to publish research articles within the broad field of public policy, public organization and administration, governance and democracy.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 8, No 4 (2017): November 2017" : 12 Documents clear
Women Leadership: A Comparative Study between Indonesia and Greece KYVELO KOKKALIALI, LYDIA KANELLI; Nurhaeni, Ismi Dwi Astuti
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Vol 8, No 4 (2017): November 2017
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgp.2017.0057.514-535

Abstract

One manifestation of women’s leadership is their representation in politics. Although regulation for their participation is implemented, representation in elected office is lower than anticipated.  This article discusses women’s representation as leaders in strategic positions, the challenges of affirmative action regulation and the cultural barriers they face in Indonesia and Greece. The study was conducted in Indonesia and Greece, with documentation method as data collection technique such as: affirmative action regulation on women’s participation in strategic positions and official statistics of women in office. Mix methods employed for data analysis. The findings show three results. Firstly, there are differences in the representation of women as leaders both in numbers and strategic positions held between the two countries. The number of women representatives in parliament in Indonesia is lower than that of Greece, with 17 % and 20% respectively. However, the most important position obtained by a woman in Indonesia is state leader, whilst in Greece is merely minister. Secondly, both countries have implemented legislation for affirmative action regulating the percentage of women candidates. The challenge is how to ensure a raise of women representation as leaders in strategic positions. Finally, women still face cultural barriers such as stereotyping, marginalization and sub-ordination. Civic education providing skills and gender sensitivity concerning leadership for men and women can outdo the barriers. Concluding, differences of women’s leadership in Indonesia and Greece are seen in their number, position, regulation and cultural barriers. This study recommends both countries to conduct regulation concerning women’s representation, not candidacy.
Exploratory Study on the Relationship between Good Public Governance and National Competitiveness SOFIK HANDOYO
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Vol 8, No 4 (2017): November 2017
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgp.2017.0057.493-513

Abstract

This study aims to examine empirically the relationship between good public governance and national competitiveness. The motivation behind the study was the desire to answer a cosmic question regarding the association between the implementation of good public governance and the capability of a country to compete in the global market. An exploratory research design was applied in this study. Public governance and national competitiveness were treated as two in- dependent variables. Public governance was broken down into attributes, namely public accountability, government effectiveness, the quality of government regulation, government control toward corruption, the rule of law and a country’s political stability. The World Governance Index (WGI) was used to measure public governance. Meanwhile, the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) was adopted to measure national competitiveness. Bivariate correlation analysis was applied in this study and involved 140 countries that are officially listed as World Bank members. The findings concluded that public governance had a positive association with national competitiveness. All attributes of public governance showed a positive and significant correlation with national competitiveness. Statistical analysis using Pearson correlation indicated that all public governance attributes indicated a solid correlation (r 0.6, p 0.01) except for political stability (r = 0.585, p 0.01) and public accountability (r= 0.541, p 0.01). Although the results revealed that not all public governance attributes had a strong correlation with national competitiveness, the nature of the correlation has already been justified. The results imply that if the government implements good public governance practice, it might have a positive impact on the capability of the nation to create power to compete with other countries in the global market .

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 3 (2022): November 2022 Vol 13, No 2 (2022): July 2022 (In press) Vol 13, No 2 (2022): July 2022 Vol 13, No 1 (2022): February 2022 Vol 12, No 3 (2021): November 2021 Vol 12, No 2 (2021): July 2021 Vol 12, No 1 (2021): February 2021 Vol 11, No 3 (2020): November 2020 Vol 11, No 2 (2020): July 2020 Vol 11, No 1 (2020): February 2020 Vol 10, No 3 (2019): November 2019 Vol 10, No 2 (2019): July 2019 Vol 10, No 1 (2019): February 2019 Vol 9, No 4 (2018): November 2018 Vol 9, No 3 (2018): August 2018 Vol 9, No 2 (2018): May 2018 Vol 9, No 1 (2018): February 2018 Vol 8, No 4 (2017): November 2017 Vol 8, No 3 (2017): August 2017 Vol 8, No 2 (2017): May 2017 Vol 8, No 1 (2017): February 2017 Vol 7, No 4 (2016): November 2016 Vol 7, No 3 (2016): August 2016 Vol 7, No 2 (2016): May 2016 Vol 7, No 1 (2016): February 2016 Vol 6, No 2 (2015): August 2015 Vol 6, No 1 (2015): February 2015 Vol 5, No 2 (2014): August 2014 Vol 5, No 1 (2014): February 2014 Vol 4, No 2 (2013): August 2013 Vol 4, No 1 (2013): February 2013 Vol 3, No 2 (2012): August 2012 Vol 3, No 1 (2012): February 2012 Vol 2, No 2 (2011): August 2011 Vol 2, No 1 (2011): February 2011 Vol 1, No 1 (2010): August 2010 More Issue