cover
Contact Name
rustan amarullah
Contact Email
rustanamarullah8@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
borneo.jurnal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. H. M. Ardans 2 No. 36 (Ring Road III). Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Borneo Administrator: Media Pengembangan Paradigma dan Inovasi Sistem Administrasi Negara
ISSN : 18580300     EISSN : 24076767     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24258/jba
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Borneo Administrator is a journal that dedicated to publishing and disseminating the results of research and development in public administration area. The scope of this journal covers experimental and analytical research in public administration areas. The topics include public policy, public management, bureaucracy, public service, civil servant, public service innovation, local autonomy, and related fields.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 6 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 5 No 1 (2009)" : 6 Documents clear
e-LEADERSHIP: Faktor Kunci Pengembangan Kapasitas Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi di Daerah Awang Anwaruddin
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 5 No 1 (2009)
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (83.499 KB) | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v5i1.37

Abstract

Leadership is not limited to a position or job; it is a worldview      and a way of being in the world. It takes vision and imagination as well as knowledge, to be a leader. We define leadership as the ability to bring people, tools and resources together to solve problems and achieve results. In the world today, we need to bring people together across national, geographic, cultural and other boundaries, using communications technologies tools to achieve results. e-Leadership means a balancing many roles and carrying them out via communications technologies.               Thus,  e-Leadership is no different from any other form of effective leadership  except that in e-leadership you have no option but to be very good at it. It  requires a high level of transformational leadership because of the highly  participative nature of the e-world between e-organisations and e-customers and  the interconnectedness between leader and follower with the ever-increasing  reality of the blurred lines between the two (Robert Burke: 2008). Key Word: e-Leadership, e-Government, Kepemimpinan transformasional,  Virtual    tim, Komunikasi multilevel, Profesionalitas
KEWENANGAN PEJABAT PUBLIK PENGGANTI DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK Bambang Giyanto
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 5 No 1 (2009)
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (128.47 KB) | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v5i1.38

Abstract

Seorang pejabat publik tidak selamanya mampu menjalankan tugas memenuhi masa jabatan yang telah ditetapkan. Ketidakmampuan memenuhi masa jabatan itu bisa disebabkan beberapa hal ; meninggalkan tugas untuk sementara, berhalangan tetap, tersangkut tindak pidana, atau mencalonkan diri sebagai kepala/wakil kepala daerah. Untuk menghindari kekosongan kepemimpinan dan agar tidak mengganggu kelancaran pelayanan publik, perlu ditetapkan pejabat publik pengganti/sementara. Penetapan pejabat publik pengganti/sementara juga perlu dilakukan dalam proses pemekaran wilayah.  Kewenangan yang dimiliki seorang pejabat publik pengganti/sementara tentu berbeda dengan pejabat publik yang definitif, karena cara memperoleh kewenangan itu sendiri, apakah diperoleh melalui atribusi, delegasi, dan mandat. Sebagai implikasi perbedaan kewenangan itu, maka tanggungjawabnya pun berbeda. Pejabat publik pengganti memiliki kewenangan yang sangat terbatas, baik dari segi kewenangan itu sendiri maupun dari segi jangka waktu, oleh karena itu perlu ada batasan kewenangan agar tidak terjadi penyalahgunaan wewenang (abuse of power), sehingga perlu ada batasan atau aturan yang jelas.   Keyword :Pejabat publik, Pejabat  publik pengganti, Pengambilan keputusan,            Kebijakan publik, Kewenangan, Tanggungjawab.
KEMITRAAN ANTARA PEMERINTAH KOTA DENGAN SWASTA DALAM PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH DI KALIMANTAN Tim Kajian PKP2A III LAN Samarinda
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 5 No 1 (2009)
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (257.119 KB) | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v5i1.39

Abstract

Mutual partnership between government and private sector or Public Private Partnership (PPP/P3s) is purposed to overcome government’s limited resources in doing regional development and public service. The advantages of partnership implementation are participation, regional income, public service improvement and absorbtion of manpower. The practices of PPP/P3s in Kalimantan have produced several kinds of partnership varians. However they’re still done in goods and service group only, and several of them tend to profit oriented. There isn’t any breakthrough of partnership on administratif services done by regional goverments. Some problems in PPP/P3 practices are negatif stigma toward government aparatus, insfrastructure facilities, government regulation and aparatus perception on partnership. District/city governments should make inovative breakthroughs to implement the partnership with private sector in all services group.  Keywords: public private partnership, public service, regional development
PENGARUH RELIABILITY, RESPONSIVENESS, ASSURANCE, EMPATHY DAN TANGIBLES TERHADAP KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK (STUDI KASUS KANTOR PELAYANAN TERPADU KOTA DUMAI) Monang Sitorus
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 5 No 1 (2009)
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (171.287 KB) | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v5i1.40

Abstract

This paper describes and analysis influence reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy dan tangibles to service quality permit  (Case study of Dumai City Office Service). The theory public service  tested out by the writer by Zeithaml, Parasuraman, and  Berry “Delivering Quality Service Balancing Customer Perception and Expectation” (1990). which consists of  five  dimension namely  Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy dan Tangibles (TERRA).  These five  dimension  were applied by the to analysis to service quality permit.  To identity the  five  influence of  dimension, a survey approach was conducted through a proportional sample of 116  head of household (informants). The data were analyzed by using  Path Analysis, in the  program LISREL ( Linear Structural Relation). The value was found out each dimensions as follows;  ( a). influence reliability ( X1) to service quality permit (Y) is 0,74 (strong category); influence responsiveness (X2) to service quality permit  (Y) is 0,59 (medium category ); influence assurance  (X3) to service quality permit  (Y) is  0,34 (low category); and influence empathy (X4) to service quality permit ( Y) is 0,53 ( medium category), influence tangibles (X5) to service quality permit (Y) is 0.41 (low category). The effect ( X1,X2,X3,X4, X5) to Y is  0.59 (medium category).  After determination influence X1,X2,X3,X4, X5 to Y is 34,81%, and the residue is 65,19% influenced  the other dissimilar factor (epsilon) is transparency, and fairness.    Key Word: Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, Tangibles and Service  Quality.
Split Ticket Voting: Menumbuhkan Kegairahan Politik Lokal? Ratri Istania
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 5 No 1 (2009)
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (113.65 KB) | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v5i1.41

Abstract

The Constitutional Court decisions upon majority vote in the election for legislative candidate replaces the traditional ballot system. Many political observers predict the application of majority vote might cause an increase of split-ticket voting in the 2009 election, especially for house of representative election. Though, split ticket voting is not unique to Indonesian election case, it seems to be a good alternative to create more vibrant local politics. Moreover, Paramadina University Rector, Anies Baswedan (2008), said, “split ticket voting will also enhance the development of local democracy [in which] a voter can choose their legislative candidate from different political party affiliation for each government level. [For example], a voter can choose the candidate from A political party for national legislative body (DPR). A candidate from B political party is choosen for provincial level legislative body (DPRD provinsi). And a candidate from C political party is for kabupaten legislative body (DPRD kabupaten).” However, this positive image of split- ticket voting has not been accompanied by sufficient analysis on its impact to local politics.   This paper seeks to address the question on the impact of split ticket voting in creating more vibrant local politics. How split-ticket voting influences the Indonesian political party and election reform agenda? What split ticket voting can do for the local politics? And the last question is how split ticket voting relates to the planning of electoral district boundaries (daerah pemilihan), and redistricting, such as pemekaran, in the local regions. To answer them, I review the literature and related government policy which will be divided into three parts: first, analyzing theoretical background and concepts of split- ticket voting; second, pros and cons of split-ticket voting in Indonesia local politics; third, studying the electoral system reformation: the inconsistency between electoral district planning and pemekaran policies; fourth, analyzing the future possibility transformation from “pemekaran” to redistricting policy: as a recommendation; and finally, conclusion.   Keywords: Split-ticket Voting, Partai Politik, Calon Legislatif, Pemilih, Politik Lokal, Daerah pemilihan, Pemekaran, Redistricting.
Logika Otonomi Tri Widodo WU.
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 5 No 1 (2009)
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (301.051 KB) | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v5i1.144

Abstract

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6


Filter by Year

2009 2009


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 21 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025 Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): April 2025 Vol. 20 No. 3 (2024): December 2024 Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024): August 2024 Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024): April 2024 Vol 19 No 3 (2023): December 2023 Vol 19 No 2 (2023): August 2023 Vol 19 No 1 (2023): April 2023 Vol 18 No 3 (2022): December 2022 Vol 18 No 2 (2022): August, 2022 Vol 18 No 1 (2022): April 2022 Vol 17 No 3 (2021): December 2021 Vol 17 No 2 (2021): August, 2021 Vol 17 No 1 (2021): April 2021 Vol 16 No 3 (2020): Desember 2020 Vol 16 No 2 (2020): Agustus 2020 Vol 16 No 1 (2020): April 2020 Vol 15 No 3 (2019): Desember 2019 Vol 15 No 2 (2019): Agustus 2019 Vol 15 No 1 (2019): April 2019 Vol 14 No 3 (2018): Desember 2018 Vol 14 No 2 (2018): Agustus 2018 Vol 14 No 1 (2018): April 2018 Vol 13 No 3 (2017): Desember 2017 Vol 13 No 2 (2017): Agustus 2017 Vol 13 No 1 (2017): April 2017 Vol 12 No 3 (2016): Desember 2016 Vol 12 No 2 (2016): Agustus 2016 Vol 12 No 1 (2016): April 2016 Vol 11 No 3 (2015): Desember 2015 Vol 11 No 2 (2015): Agustus 2015 Vol 11 No 1 (2015): April 2015 Vol 10 No 3 (2014): Desember 2014 Vol 10 No 2 (2014): Agustus 2014 Vol 10 No 1 (2014): April 2014 Vol 9 No 3 (2013) Vol 9 No 2 (2013) Vol 9 No 1 (2013) Vol 8 No 3 (2012) Vol 8 No 2 (2012) Vol 8 No 1 (2012) Vol 7 No 3 (2011) Vol 7 No 2 (2011) Vol 7 No 1 (2011) Vol 6 No 3 (2010) Vol 6 No 2 (2010) Vol 6 No 1 (2010) Vol 5 No 3 (2009) Vol 5 No 2 (2009) Vol 5 No 1 (2009) Vol 4 No 3 (2008) Vol 4 No 2 (2008) Vol 4 No 1 (2008) Vol 3 No 3 (2007) Vol 3 No 2 (2007) Vol 3 No 1 (2007) Vol 2 No 3 (2006) Vol 2 No 2 (2006) Vol 2 No 1 (2006) Vol 1 No 3 (2005) Vol 1 No 2 (2005) Vol 1 No 1 (2005) More Issue