cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Nur Rohim Yunus
Contact Email
jurnal.citahukum@uinjkt.ac.id
Phone
+6281384795000
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.citahukum@uinjkt.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 95 Ciputat 15411
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Jurnal Cita Hukum
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
ISSN : 23561440     EISSN : 2502230X     DOI : 10.15408
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other
Jurnal Cita Hukum is an international journal published by the Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia. The focus is to provide readers with a better understanding of legal studies and present developments through the publication of articles, research reports, and book reviews. Jurnal Cita Hukum specializes in legal studies, and is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on the subject. This journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Published exclusively in English, the Review seeks to expand the boundaries of Indonesian legal discourses to access English-speaking contributors and readers all over the world. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. The range of contents covered by the Review spans from established legal scholarships and fields of law such as private laws and public laws which include constitutional and administrative law as well as criminal law, international laws concerning Indonesia, to various approaches to legal studies such as comparative law, law and economics, sociology of law and legal anthropology, and many others. Specialized legal studies concerning various aspects of life such as commercial and business laws, technology law, natural resources law and the like are also welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020)" : 12 Documents clear
Investigating the Injuries of Murder in Prohibition in Iranian Laws Mirmohamadi, Jahangir; Adabi, Hamidreza
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v8i1.15041

Abstract

AbstractThe issue of murder in marriage is regulated in Article 179 of the Criminal Code before the revolution originated in Article 324 of the French Criminal Code, and was previously reflected in Article 630 of the Islamic Criminal Code after the amendment in 1996. This problem has been criticized in terms of jurisprudence and validity. Deficiencies appear to be seen as weaknesses of a legitimate defense theory as a justified basis for verdicts, weaknesses in jurisprudence, and opportunities for misuse of sanctions for murder in marriage. Most of the objections are caused by; First, the lack of attention to place the problem into the realm of legal certainty, not the realm of proof, and second: the lack of careful analysis of the principles of jurisprudence and only refers to the views of some legal experts. This study uses a qualitative research method with the statutory approach. The results of the study stated that murder in marriage is relative in terms of defense and deserves the death penalty. In this study, the authors examined the damage to victims, the views of well-known legal experts, and an analysis of Iran's statute law with an analytical approach.Keywords: Damage, murder in marriage, statutory regulations AbstrakMasalah pembunuhan di dalam perkawinan diatur dalam Pasal 179 KUHP sebelum revolusi berasal dari Pasal 324 dari KUHP Perancis, dan sebelumnya tercermin dalam Pasal 630 KUHP Islam setelah perubahan pada tahun 1996. Masalah ini, mengalami kritik dalam hal yurisprudensi dan validitas. Kekurangan tampak terlihat seperti kelemahan teori pertahanan yang sah sebagai dasar yang dibenarkan untuk vonis, kelemahan yurisprudensi, dan peluang penyalahgunaan sanksi pembunuhan di dalam perkawinan. Sebagian besar keberatan  disebabkan oleh; Pertama, kurangnya perhatian untuk menempatkan masalah ke ranah kepastian hukum, bukan ranah pembuktian, dan kedua: kurangnya kecermatan analisis pada prinsip-prinsip yurisprudensi dan hanya merujuk kepada pandangan beberapa ahli hukum saja. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa pembunuhan di dalam pernikahan bersifat relatif dalam hal pembelaan dan layak mendapatkan hukuman mati. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis melakukan pemeriksaan pada kerusakan korban, pandangan terkenal para ahli hukum, dan analisis pada hukum statuta Iran dengan pendekatan analitis.Kata kunci: Kerusakan, pembunuhan di dalam nikah, peraturan perundang-undang АннотацияПроблема убийства в браке регулируется статьей 179 Уголовного кодекса до революции, возникшей в статье 324 Уголовного кодекса Франции, и ранее была отражена в статье 630 Исламского уголовного кодекса после внесения поправки в 1996 году. Эта проблема подвергнута критике с точки зрения юриспруденции и обоснованности. Недостатки, по-видимому, рассматриваются как слабые стороны законной теории защиты в качестве оправданной основы для вынесения вердиктов, слабые стороны в юриспруденции и возможности неправильного применения санкций за убийство в браке. Большинство претензий вызваны: во-первых, недостаточным вниманием, чтобы поместить проблему в область юридической однозначности, а не в область доказывания; во-вторых: недостаточным тщательным анализом принципов юриспруденции и отношением только к мнениям некоторых судебных экспертов. В данном исследовании используется качественный метод исследования с законодательным подходом. Результаты исследования показали, что убийство в браке является относительным с точки зрения защиты и заслуживает смертной казни. В этом исследовании авторы провели расследование ущерба, нанесенного жертвам, мнения известных судебных экспертов и анализ статутного права Ирана с аналитическим подходом.Ключевые слова: Ущерб, Убийство в браке, Законодательные нормативно-правовые акты
Indonesian State Owned Enterprises (BUMN or SOEs) and the Urgency of Implementation of Principle of ’Business Judgment Rule’ Ansari, Teuku Syahrul; Sahrasad, Herdi; Iryadi, Irfan
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v8i1.15042

Abstract

Abstract:State-owned enterprises (SOEs or BUMN) companies need management which generally emphasizes governance which is more concerned with the principles of efficiency and effectiveness. In reality, it is evident that in Indonesia state-owned companies have an enormous economic and social role, and are an extraordinary force for the economic sector. In Singapore and Malaysia, SOEs also contribute greatly to economic activities. In Indonesia, SOEs are included in several diverse sectors or fields of business, from banking, energy, food, infrastructure, and transportation on sea, land, and air. A total of 118 SOEs in 2015 with a total asset of 5,395 trillion rupiahs would certainly be able to make a greater contribution to economic growth in 2016 if they can synergize in managing the business sector. SOEs' assets are also estimated to be greater through the SOE asset revaluation process. The Constitutional Court in case number 48 / PUU-XI / 2013 and case No. 62 / PUU-X1 / 2013 dated May 22, 2013, decided that management SOEs must use the principle of Business Judgment Rule. In the verdict, it is also stated that state-owned finances are state finance. As a result, this verdict brings legal certainty about the position of SOEs' finance. This paper explains that the development of state-owned enterprises-SOEs as a corporation that brings social and business missions is facing constitutional juridical problems and facing the challenges of globalization. Factually, at this time legal development cannot be separated from the influence of globalization. Globalization in the economic field has affected various fields of the business sector in the world.Keywords: State-Owned Enterprises; Globalization; Economic Law; Principle; Business Judgment Rule; Corporation; Indonesia. Abstrak:Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) membutuhkan manajemen yang umumnya menekankan tata kelola yang lebih mementingkan prinsip efisiensi dan efektivitas. Pada kenyataannya, terbukti bahwa di Indonesia perusahaan milik negara memiliki peran ekonomi dan sosial yang sangat besar, dan merupakan kekuatan dan pendorong ekonomi yang luar biasa. Di Singapura dan Malaysia, BUMN juga berkontribusi besar pada kegiatan ekonomi. Di Indonesia, BUMN termasuk dalam sejumlah sektor atau bidang usaha yang beragam, mulai dari perbankan, energi, makanan, infrastruktur, dan transportasi, baik laut, darat dan udara. Sebanyak 118 BUMN pada 2015 dengan total aset Rp5.395 triliun tentu akan mampu memberikan kontribusi yang lebih besar bagi pertumbuhan ekonomi 2016 jika mereka bisa bersinergi dalam mengelola sektor bisnis. Aset BUMN juga diperkirakan lebih besar melalui proses revaluasi aset BUMN. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam kasus nomor 48/PUU-XI/2013 dan kasus No. 62/PUU-X1/2013 tanggal 22 Mei 2013, memutuskan bahwa manajemen BUMN harus menggunakan prinsip Aturan Penilaian Bisnis. Dalam putusan itu, dinyatakan juga bahwa keuangan milik negara adalah keuangan negara. Akibatnya, putusan ini membawa kepastian hukum tentang posisi keuangan BUMN. Makalah ini menjelaskan bahwa pengembangan BUMN sebagai perusahaan yang melakukan misi sosial dan bisnis menghadapi masalah yuridis konstitusional dan menghadapi tantangan globalisasi. Secara faktual, saat ini perkembangan hukum tidak dapat dipisahkan dari pengaruh globalisasi. Globalisasi di bidang ekonomi telah mempengaruhi berbagai bidang sektor bisnis di dunia.Kata kunci: Perusahaan Milik Negara; Globalisasi; Hukum Ekonomi; Prinsip; Aturan Penilaian Bisnis; Perusahaan; Indonesia.  Аннотация:BUMN нуждаются в управлении, которое, как правило, делает упор на принципы эффективности и результативности. На самом деле очевидно, что в Индонезии BUMN играют огромную экономическую и социальную роль и являются исключительной силой и экономическим двигателем. В Сингапуре и Малайзии BUMN также вносят большой вклад в экономическую деятельность. В Индонезии BUMN входят в ряд различных секторов или сфер бизнеса, таких как банковское дело, энергетика, продовольствие, инфраструктура и транспорт, как морской, наземный и воздушный. В общей сложности 118 BUMN в 2015 году с общим активом 5,395 триллионов рупий, несомненно, смогут внести больший вклад в экономический рост в 2016 году, если они смогут объединить усилия в управлении бизнес-сектором. Активы BUMN также оцениваются как более значимые в процессе переоценки активов BUMN. Конституционный суд по делу № 48/PUU-XI/2013 и делу № 62/PUU-X1/2013 от 22 мая 2013 г. постановил, что руководство BUMN должно использовать принцип Правила Делового Суждения. В постановлении также указывалось, что финансы BUMN являются государственными финансами. В результате это решение вносит юридическую определенность в отношении положения финансов BUMN. В этой статье объясняется, что развитие BUMN как корпорации, выполняющей социальные и бизнес-задачи, сталкивается с конституционными юридическими проблемами и проблемами глобализации. Фактически, в настоящее время правовое развитие невозможно отделить от влияния глобализации. Глобализация в экономической сфере повлияла на различные сферы бизнеса в мире.Ключевые слова : Государственные Предприятия; Глобализация; Экономический закон; Принцип; Правило Делового Суждения; Корпорация; Индонезия.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Summer Edition Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Spring Edition Vol 13, No 1 (2025) Vol 13, No 1 (2025): In Press Vol 12, No 3 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024) Vol 12, No 2 (2024) Vol 12, No 2 (2024): In Press Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024) Vol 12, No 1 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023) Vol 11, No 3 (2023) Vol 11, No 2 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023) Vol 11, No 1 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023) Vol 10, No 3 (2022) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022) Vol 10, No 2 (2022) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 1 (2022) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2021) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021) Vol 9, No 2 (2021) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 1 (2021) Vol 8, No 3 (2020) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020) Vol 8, No 2 (2020) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 1 (2020) Vol 7, No 3 (2019) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2019) Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2016) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2015) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 1 (2014) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 1 (2013) More Issue