cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
aljamiah@uin-suka.ac.id
Phone
+62274-558186
Journal Mail Official
aljamiah@uin-suka.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Wahab Hasbullah UIN Sunan Kalijaga Jln. Marsda Adisucipto No 1
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
ISSN : 0126012X     EISSN : 2338557X     DOI : 10.14421
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities,
Religion Humanities
Al-Jamiah invites scholars, researchers, and students to contribute the result of their studies and researches in the areas related to Islam, Muslim society, and other religions which covers textual and fieldwork investigation with various perspectives of law, philosophy, mysticism, history, art, theology, sociology, anthropology, political science and others.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Studi Agama
Articles 19 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 45, No 2 (2007)" : 19 Documents clear
Current Debates in the Post-Soeharto Indonesian Islam: Examining the Intellectual Base of Liberal and Anti-liberal Islamic Movement Muzakki, Akh.
Al-Jamiah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 45, No 2 (2007)
Publisher : Al-Jamiah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2007.452.321-366

Abstract

This article discusses intensively the current debate between those who support and against liberalism within pluralized Indonesian muslims. The two groups are represented by JIL (Jaringan Islam Liberal) and MD (Media Dakwah). The author compares three fundamental aspects of religious interpretations: epistemological assumptions, methodological framework, and subject-matter. Epistemological assumptions deal with philosophical foundations that are employed by JIL and MD as principles to understand Islam. Methodological framework means the way the two groups understand and interpret Islam and its teaching based on their philosophical foundations. In terms of subject-matter, the author discusses six issues, namely (1) ijtihad, (2) approaches to text, (3) the meaning of truth, (4) the minority and the oppressed, (5) freedom of religion, and (6) mundane and spiritual authority. From the three fundamental aspects of religious interpretations that are compared, the author concludes that JIL is a group of muslims who understand Islam by implementing liberalism, while MD represents a group of muslim who promote conservatism, purification, and anti-liberalism within Indonesian Islam.
On Human Rights and the Qur’anic Perspective: Freedom of Religion and the Rule of Apostasy Almirzanah, Syafa’atun
Al-Jamiah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 45, No 2 (2007)
Publisher : Al-Jamiah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2007.452.367-388

Abstract

It is often argued that Islam is not compatible with modernity. This can be seen for instance in the fact of the problem that Islam faces to the challenge of universal values of human rights. Built on this supposition, the present article discusses on the great extent the question of religious freedom in Islam. As freedom of religion in the framework of universal declaration of human rights can mean as freedom to change religion, this contradicts to Islamic prohibition of apostasy, punishable with death penalty. The author argues that Islam in fact guarantees religious freedom. This is clear from the Quranic injunctions assuring the freedom of choice whether to embrace Islam or not. Such a freedom is however often contradicted to one prophetic tradition sanctioning death penalty for apostasy. In her view, the author believes that the hadith more in attunes to the political strategy of the prophet to safe Muslim community from any acts of treason or sedition. Death penalty for apostasy is thus not related to the mere personal crime of changing religion but more that of public law related to war or crimes against state. More relying on the modern interpretation of the Quranic verses as well as the prophetic traditions, the author concludes that Islam is in conjunction with the modern values of religious freedom in which personal choice of religion or belief is the backbone of human rights.
Unquestioned Gender Lens in Contemporary Indonesian Shari‘ah-Ordinances (Perda Syariah) Candraningrum, Dewi
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 45, No 2 (2007)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2007.452.289-320

Abstract

Indonesian muslim participation in the democratic arena is now contested with the arrival of the decentralization process in 423 districts since 1992. The most notable movement is the quest for Islamic identity in the rejuvenation of Shari ‘ah Ordinances which is interpreted symbolically and transcripturally. These ordinances have unrecognized the importance of gender lens in its practice. Until the end of 2007 no less than 63 districts have ratified Perda Syari’ah. In general, these ordinances designed to govern three aspects of public life, namely (1) to eradicate social crimes especially prostitutions and gambling; (2) to enforce ritual observances among Muslims such as reading the Qur’an, Friday congregations and fasting during Ramadan; and (3) to govern the way people dress up in public sphere especially the head-veiling for women. Although Islam is the religion of the majority there are also non-muslim among Indonesian and institutionally Indonesia is not an Islamic state, therefore the ratification of Perda Syari’ah betrayed national consensus agreed upon by the founding fathers of the republic.
Examining Asghar Ali Engineer’s Qur’anic Interpretation of Women in Islam Nuryatno, M. Agus
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 45, No 2 (2007)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2007.452.389-414

Abstract

This article discusses Asghar Ali Engineer’s interpretation of women in Islam. Two topics discussed in this article are the status of women in Islam and the veil. Engineer offers an approach in understanding the Qur’an to deal with these topics and his method is based on three principles: firstly, the Qur’an has two ingredients: normative and contextual. Normative ingredient refers to the fundamental values and principles of Qur’an such as equality and justice, and these principles are eternal and can be applied in various social contexts. Contextual revelations, on the other hand, deal with verses that were tailored to socio-historical problems of the time. In line with the changes in context and time these verses can be abrogated. Secondly, the interpretation of the Quranic verses is very dependent on one’s own perceptions, world-view, experiences and the sociocultural background in which he/she lives. Thus, a ‘pure’ interpretation of the Scripture is not possible; it is always influenced by sociological circumstances, no one can be free of such influences. Thirdly, the meaning of the Quranic verses unfolds with times, therefore, the interpretations of classical scholars can be radically different from the interpretation of modern scholars. This is because Quranic verses often use symbolic or metaphorical language that is ambiguous in meaning. This ambiguity serves, of course, to promote flexibility and creative change. These three principles can be employed to understand the status of women in Islam and the veil.
Islam and Human Rights in Indonesia: An Account of Muslim Intellectuals’ Views Fuad, Ahmad Nur; Arbaiyah, A.; Mughni, Syafiq; Jainuri, Achmad
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 45, No 2 (2007)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2007.452.241-287

Abstract

The issue of Islam and human rights has become important issue in Indonesia at least since the last two decades. Indonesian Muslims have developed two different approaches to human rights: in complete agreement with the declaration of universal human rights; and in resistance to that declaration and developing understanding that Islam encompasses human rights values. The article argues for its part that human rights are not absolutely universal, because they are based chiefly on Western values, structures, ethics and morality. For that, it is reasonable to question their universality. The present article focuses on how Indonesian Muslim intellectuals conceive of human rights and Islamic values as they perceive the two. Specifically, it focuses on four principal issues in human rights discourse: freedom of opinion, religious freedoms, rights of women, and criminal law. The authors reveal in the conclusion that although some Indonesian Muslim intellectuals admit that universal human rights are truly universal, they still see differences in certain cases, due to differences in socio-cultural background. They have tried to affect a synthesis between the universality and particularity of both Islamic and universal human rights in order to make both fit within the Indonesian context.
Current Debates in the Post-Soeharto Indonesian Islam: Examining the Intellectual Base of Liberal and Anti-liberal Islamic Movement Muzakki, Akh.
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 45, No 2 (2007)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2007.452.321-366

Abstract

This article discusses intensively the current debate between those who support and against liberalism within pluralized Indonesian muslims. The two groups are represented by JIL (Jaringan Islam Liberal) and MD (Media Dakwah). The author compares three fundamental aspects of religious interpretations: epistemological assumptions, methodological framework, and subject-matter. Epistemological assumptions deal with philosophical foundations that are employed by JIL and MD as principles to understand Islam. Methodological framework means the way the two groups understand and interpret Islam and its teaching based on their philosophical foundations. In terms of subject-matter, the author discusses six issues, namely (1) ijtihad, (2) approaches to text, (3) the meaning of truth, (4) the minority and the oppressed, (5) freedom of religion, and (6) mundane and spiritual authority. From the three fundamental aspects of religious interpretations that are compared, the author concludes that JIL is a group of muslims who understand Islam by implementing liberalism, while MD represents a group of muslim who promote conservatism, purification, and anti-liberalism within Indonesian Islam.
Editorial: Islam and Human Rights, Contested Viewpoints Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, Editor
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 45, No 2 (2007)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The remaining problem faced by Muslims living in this modern life is how the teachings of Islam believed as bless for all human being can be confirmed in the reality of everyday life humanity crammed with conflicts and dissonances. It is staggering to consider that not all Muslims concern, and perhaps do not wish to know, about the current discourse on Islam and its relation with others. Although Samuel Huntington’s controversial theory of “Clash of Civilization” might be challenged by most Muslim circles, the heightening conflict involving Western and Islamic civilizations in the aftermath of September 11, 2001 has approved his theory. The attack of terrorism to the US soil has triggered not only the unremitting war on terror undergone towards the alleged Muslim terrorists worldwide but also the worsening relationship between the two civilizations believed to have been engulfed since the two decades before. Candidly, this phenomenon has also affected the intra-faith dialogue among Muslims having different thought of religion.
On Human Rights and the Qur’anic Perspective: Freedom of Religion and the Rule of Apostasy Almirzanah, Syafa’atun
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 45, No 2 (2007)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2007.452.367-388

Abstract

It is often argued that Islam is not compatible with modernity. This can be seen for instance in the fact of the problem that Islam faces to the challenge of universal values of human rights. Built on this supposition, the present article discusses on the great extent the question of religious freedom in Islam. As freedom of religion in the framework of universal declaration of human rights can mean as freedom to change religion, this contradicts to Islamic prohibition of apostasy, punishable with death penalty. The author argues that Islam in fact guarantees religious freedom. This is clear from the Quranic injunctions assuring the freedom of choice whether to embrace Islam or not. Such a freedom is however often contradicted to one prophetic tradition sanctioning death penalty for apostasy. In her view, the author believes that the hadith more in attunes to the political strategy of the prophet to safe Muslim community from any acts of treason or sedition. Death penalty for apostasy is thus not related to the mere personal crime of changing religion but more that of public law related to war or crimes against state. More relying on the modern interpretation of the Quranic verses as well as the prophetic traditions, the author concludes that Islam is in conjunction with the modern values of religious freedom in which personal choice of religion or belief is the backbone of human rights.
Al-Maujah al-Islāmiyyah al-Ukhrā: Al-Istisyrāq wa al-Dirāsāt al-Islāmiyyah al-Mu‘āṣirah Abdullah, Muhammad Amin
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 45, No 2 (2007)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2007.452.415-438

Abstract

This article explores the mapping of the development of Islamic studies from its inception to the present, which consists of three waves. The first wave was the study of Islam by internal Muslims themselves. This period lacks comprehensive factors to categorize as an academic study. The second wave was Islamic studies carried out by experts from outside Islam who were called orientalists. This wave of Islamic study involves academically sufficient methodology. Meanwhile, the third wave is generally carried out by internal groups of Muslims who are enlightened and equipped with contemporary sciences, especially humanities.[Tulisan ini berisi pemetaan perkembangan studi Islam dari awal pertumbuhannya hingga masa sekarang, yang dapat dipilah menjadi tiga gelombang. Gelombang pertama dibangun sendiri oleh internal umat Islam. Periode ini tidak memiliki faktor-faktor yang komprehensif untuk sebuah studi akademis. Gelombang kedua merupakan studi Islam yang dilakukan oleh ahli dari luar Islam yang mendapat sebutan sebagai orientalis. Gelombang ini dipandang sebagai studi Islam yang melibatkan metodologi yang cukup sebagai kajian akademik. Sedangkan gelombang ketiga adalah yang umumnya dilakukan oleh kelompok internal Muslim yang tercerahkan dan terbekali dengan keilmuan kontemporer, khususnya ilmu humaniora.]

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 19

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2007 2007


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 63, No 1 (2025) Vol 62, No 2 (2024) Vol 62, No 1 (2024) Vol 61, No 2 (2023) Vol 61, No 1 (2023) Vol 60, No 2 (2022) Vol 60, No 1 (2022) Vol 59, No 2 (2021) Vol 59, No 1 (2021) Vol 58, No 2 (2020) Vol 58, No 1 (2020) Vol 57, No 2 (2019) Vol 57, No 1 (2019) Vol 56, No 2 (2018) Vol 56, No 1 (2018) Vol 56, No 1 (2018) Vol 55, No 2 (2017) Vol 55, No 2 (2017) Vol 55, No 1 (2017) Vol 55, No 1 (2017) Vol 54, No 2 (2016) Vol 54, No 2 (2016) Vol 54, No 1 (2016) Vol 54, No 1 (2016) Vol 53, No 2 (2015) Vol 53, No 2 (2015) Vol 53, No 1 (2015) Vol 53, No 1 (2015) Vol 52, No 2 (2014) Vol 52, No 2 (2014) Vol 52, No 1 (2014) Vol 52, No 1 (2014) Vol 51, No 2 (2013) Vol 51, No 2 (2013) Vol 51, No 1 (2013) Vol 51, No 1 (2013) Vol 50, No 2 (2012) Vol 50, No 2 (2012) Vol 50, No 1 (2012) Vol 50, No 1 (2012) Vol 49, No 2 (2011) Vol 49, No 2 (2011) Vol 49, No 1 (2011) Vol 49, No 1 (2011) Vol 48, No 2 (2010) Vol 48, No 2 (2010) Vol 48, No 1 (2010) Vol 48, No 1 (2010) Vol 47, No 2 (2009) Vol 47, No 2 (2009) Vol 47, No 1 (2009) Vol 47, No 1 (2009) Vol 46, No 2 (2008) Vol 46, No 2 (2008) Vol 46, No 1 (2008) Vol 46, No 1 (2008) Vol 45, No 2 (2007) Vol 45, No 2 (2007) Vol 45, No 1 (2007) Vol 45, No 1 (2007) Vol 44, No 2 (2006) Vol 44, No 2 (2006) Vol 44, No 1 (2006) Vol 44, No 1 (2006) Vol 43, No 2 (2005) Vol 43, No 2 (2005) Vol 43, No 1 (2005) Vol 43, No 1 (2005) Vol 42, No 2 (2004) Vol 42, No 2 (2004) Vol 42, No 1 (2004) Vol 42, No 1 (2004) Vol 41, No 2 (2003) Vol 41, No 1 (2003) Vol 41, No 1 (2003) Vol 40, No 2 (2002) Vol 40, No 1 (2002) Vol 39, No 2 (2001) Vol 39, No 1 (2001) Vol 38, No 2 (2000) Vol 38, No 1 (2000) No 64 (1999) No 63 (1999) No 62 (1998) No 61 (1998) No 60 (1997) No 59 (1996) No 58 (1995) No 57 (1994) No 56 (1994) No 55 (1994) No 54 (1994) No 53 (1993) No 52 (1993) No 51 (1993) No 50 (1992) No 49 (1992) No 48 (1992) No 47 (1991) No 46 (1991) No 45 (1991) No 44 (1991) No 43 (1990) No 42 (1990) No 41 (1990) No 40 (1990) No 39 (1989) No 38 (1989) No 37 (1989) No 36 (1988) No 35 (1987) No 34 (1986) No 33 (1985) No 32 (1984) No 31 (1984) No 30 (1983) No 29 (1983) No 28 (1982) No 27 (1982) No 26 (1981) No 25 (1981) No 24 (1980) No 23 (1980) No 22 (1980) No 21 (1979) No 20 (1978) No 19 (1978) No 18 (1978) No 17 (1977) No 16 (1977) No 14 (1976) No 12 (1976) No 11 (1975) No 10 (1975) No 9 (1975) No 8 (1975) More Issue