cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Arbitrer
Published by Universitas Andalas
ISSN : 23391162     EISSN : 25501011     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media
ARBITRER Jurnal Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia, merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang menyajikan artikel orisinil tentang pengetahuan dan informasi penelitian atau aplikasi penelitian dan pengembangan terkini dalam bidang ilmu bahasa (linguistik). Jurnal ini merupakan sarana publikasi dan ajang berbagi informasi keilmuan terkait dan pengembangannya di bidang humaniora khususnya linguistic, yang diterbitkan oleh program studi Linguistik Unand. Pemuatan artikel di jurnal ini dialamatkan ke alamat editor. Informasi lengkap untuk pemuatan artikel dan petunjuk penulisan artikel tersedia di dalam setiap terbitan. Artikel yang diterbitkan telah melalui proses seleksi oleh editior dan reviewer. Jurnal ini terbit secara berkala sebanyak dua kali dalam setahun (April dan Oktober). Artikel yang lolos seleksi akan dipungut biaya guna keberlanjutan jurnal, sedangkan pengiriman naskah tidak dipungut biaya. Diharapkan ARBITRER Jurnal Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia cabang Universitas Andalas dengan tampilan baru ini akan terbit berkelanjutan dan terakreditasi.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 11 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 10 No. 3 (2023)" : 11 Documents clear
Exploring Cultural Dynamics: Comparative Analysis of Argumentative English Essays Among Pakistani and Chinese Learners using Multidimensional Analysis Arooba Abid; Ali Siddique; Nisa Fatima
JURNAL ARBITRER Vol. 10 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ar.10.3.221-230.2023

Abstract

This study aims at exploring comparative linguistic variation across Pakistani and Chinese learners’ English argumentative essays using a multidimensional analysis (MDA) approach. This study uses a quantitative approach to describing co-occurring linguistic features. The corpus comprising 400 Pakistani and Chinese learners’ essays used in this study has been electronically derived from an online source, ICNALE. The representative corpus has been tagged and analysed through MAT tagger. This study addresses how the language of Pakistani and Chinese learners vary comparatively linguistically; it also explores their linguistic characterization which distinguishes their variety through their co-occurring linguistic features using MD analysis by utilizing five dimensions. The study is restricted to only two countries i.e., Pakistan and China, and the size of the data is considerably more restricted to one sub-register of essay writing, namely, argumentative essays. The results indicate that the language of Pakistani learners’ essays is informational but Chinese learners’ essays are involved in dimension 1 Chinese learners’ essays are narrative whereas Pakistanis learners’ essays are non-narrative on dimension 2. Dimension 3 specifies that Pakistani learners’ essay writings implement that the text is independent of context and contains significant nominalizations while Chinese learners’ essay writings are context-dependent in nature. Dimension 4 indicates that Chinese learners’ essay writings are more explicit and persuasive specifying extensive use of modal verbs than Pakistani learners’ writings. The nature of Chinese learners’ essays is abstract, formal, and technical while Pakistani learners’ essays are non-abstract, objective, and natural on Dimension 5. This study has shed light on how learners acquire new words and expressions from reading different texts that identify various lexical grammatical aspects writers employ and serve as the fundamental source of variety in their language. The categories of dimensions are developed based on particular linguistic features that are over- or under-utilized by assessing the statistical data.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 11

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 11 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2016) Vol 3, No 1 (2016) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2015) Vol 2, No 2 (2015) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013) More Issue