cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Anggun Badu Kusuma
Contact Email
anggun.badu@gmail.com
Phone
+6285725081435
Journal Mail Official
alphamathjurnal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. K.H. Ahmad Dahlan, PO. BOX 202, Purwokerto, 53182
Location
Kab. banyumas,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
ISSN : 2477409X     EISSN : 25499084     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education adalah jurnal pendidikan matematika yang menyajikan artikel hasil pemikiran dan penelitian serta perkembangan mutakhir. Alphamath merupakan jurnal peer reviewed dan open access. Alphamath diterbitkan oleh Prodi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto. Alphamath mengundang para guru/pendidik matematika di sekolah, dosen, pengamat, dan peneliti pendidikan matematika di seluruh dunia untuk bertukar pikiran dan memajukan keilmuan di bidang pendidikan matematika. Cakupan dan lingkup penelitian meliputi: kurikulum pendidikan matematika, pembelajaran matematika yang inovatif dan kreatif, media pembelajaran matematika, penilaian dan evaluasi pembelajaran matematika, lesson study, kemampuan berpikir matematis, dan ICT dalam pembelajaran matematika.
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Alphamath: Vol. 10, No. 1, May 2024" : 13 Documents clear
The Level of Effectiveness of TPS and Conventional Methods Judging from Students' Geometry Learning Results Using the N-Gain Test Triyono, Ageng; Nuary, Rusdi Hamdany; Permatasari, Nisa; Yuni, Yatha; Wibowo, Teguh
AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education Alphamath: Vol. 10, No. 1, May 2024
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/alphamath.v10i1.21530

Abstract

The low results of student geometry learning require a trial of the think-pair-share method as a replacement for conventional methods. This research aims to: (1) compare the level of effectiveness of applying the think-pair-share method with conventional learning in improving student geometry learning outcomes, and; (2) determine whether or not there is a significant effect from using the two methods. The method used is quasi-experimental with a nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design involving an experimental group and a control group. Each group consisted of 23 class VII students selected non-randomly from the population. Data was taken using a geometry learning outcomes test instrument. Data were analyzed using the N-Gain Score test, the results of the calculations were converted into interpretation categories for N-Gain effectiveness to be concluded. Research findings: (1) the application of both methods was "ineffective", as shown by the calculation results of the average N-Gain score (%) for the experimental group of 38.112% and the control group of 30.636%, and; (2) based on the results of the hypothesis test, it was concluded that there was no significant influence from the application of the two methods on improving student geometry learning outcomes. The implication of this finding is that it is not recommended to apply the think-pair-share method if it is only focused on improving the geometry learning outcomes of class VII students, but it can still be applied for the purpose of developing students' collaboration skills
Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills in Review of Self-Efficacy in The Project-Based Learning Model Using Project Assessment Noor, Hanif Juhar; Masrukan, Masrukan; Dewi, Nuriana Rachmani
AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education Alphamath: Vol. 10, No. 1, May 2024
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/alphamath.v10i1.20624

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the quality of mathematics learning after applying PjBL with project assessment on students' mathematical communication skills (KKM) and students' KKM in terms of self-efficacy in PjBL learning with project assessment. The type of research is a mix method with a sequential explanatory design. In this study, 6 research subjects were taken based on the level of self-efficacy in students of grade X-8 SMAN 6 Cirebon. The results showed that (1) the PjBL learning model with project assessment improved the quality of mathematics learning for KKM students, and (2) research subjects with high self-efficacy categories are able to meet all KKM indicators, namely stating problems into written mathematical ideas, stating mathematical problems in the form of drawings or mathematical models, presenting written mathematical problem solving in an organized and structured manner, and evaluating mathematical ideas in writing. Subjects with moderate self-efficacy categories were only able to meet the KKM indicators, namely expressing problems into written mathematical ideas and expressing mathematical problems into images or mathematical models. Subjects with a low self-efficacy category were only able to meet the KKM indicators, namely presenting written mathematical problem solving in an organized and structured manner, and evaluating mathematical ideas in writing.
Mathematical Connections of Students Viewed from Adversity Quotient in Problem-Based Learning Using Math City Map Supono, Lilik; Agoestanto, Arief; Wijayanti, Kristina
AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education Alphamath: Vol. 10, No. 1, May 2024
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/alphamath.v10i1.21662

Abstract

The connection between mathematics and adversity quotient (AQ) has an important role in a person's ability to make decisions to solve problems in life. One of the efforts to improve it is through the application of technology in learning. The Math-City Map (MCM)-assisted Problem-based learning (PBL) model is one of the learnings that utilizes technology combining the PBL model and MCM-assisted learning. This study aims to (1) the quality of learning with a problem-based learning model using a math city map on mathematical connection ability (KKM, (2) test the effect of AQ on students' mathematical connection ability in MCM-assisted PBL learning. This research is a mixed method research with an explanatory sequential design with a quantitative portion greater than qualitative. The population of this study was grade VII students of SMPN 2 Ambarawa. Qualitative data was taken based on students' AQ, namely the climber, camper, and quitter categories. Quantitative data analysis techniques with parametric statistics such as mean tests, classical due diligence, and regression tests. Qualitative data analysis techniques use data reduction, presentation, and conclusions. The results showed that (1) MCM-assisted PBL learning was effective in improving students' mathematical connections (2) there was an influence of AQ on students' mathematical connection abilities in MCM-assisted PBL learning

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Alphamath: Vol. 11, No. 1, May 2025 Alphamath: Vol. 10, No. 2, November 2024 Alphamath: Vol. 10, No. 1, May 2024 Alphamath: Vol. 9, No. 2, November 2023 Alphamath: Vol. 9, No. 1, May 2023 Alphamath: Vol. 8, No. 2, November 2022 Alphamath: Vol. 8, No. 1, May 2022 Alphamath: Vol. 7, No. 2, November 2021 Alphamath: Vol. 7, No. 1, May 2021 Alphamath: Vol. 6, No. 2, November 2020 Alphamath: Vol. 6, No. 1, May 2020 Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2018) Vol 3, No 2 (2017) Vol 3, No 1 (2017) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016) Vol 2, No 2 (2016) Vol 2, No 1 (2016) Vol 1, No 1 (2015) More Issue