cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lawreviewuph@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang - 15811
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 14122561     EISSN : 26211939     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Law Review is published by the Faculty of Law of Universitas Pelita Harapan and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. Law Review was established in July 2001 and is published triannually in July, November, and March. Law Review provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aim of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Medical Law, Adat Law, and Environmental Law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 2 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue " Vol 11, No 2 (2011)" : 2 Documents clear
Aspek Hukum Kartu Kredit dan Dilema Penagihannya Sihombing, Jonker
LAW REVIEW Vol 11, No 2 (2011)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Credit card is used by holder or consumer to pay bills or to withdraw money in case of needs. In order to get a credit card, consumer should file an application to the issuer ( usually bank ), and then issuer will give approval on it. Terms and condtions of the card is set standard and designed solely by the issuer. This standardized clause is considered as a “take it or leave it contract”, which couldn’t be avoided by holder. Act No. 8 of 1999 regarding Consumer’s Protection prohibits standardized contract if it creates harm to consumer. Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 11/11/PBI/2009 together with Bank Indonesia Circular Letter No. 11/10/DASP provide rights and obligations of the issuer in order to strengthen consumer’s protection. In many cases issuer gives the proxy to debt collector to collect over-due balance of credit card, and most of the time debt collector does the job improperly. With the recent death of credit card holder in Citibank Jakarta supposed to happen because of the guilty of debt collector, we are of the opinion that Bank Indonesia shoud review and strengthen all regulations regarding credit card business.
Between Keeping Bank Secrecy and Reporting Suspicious Transaction In The Fight Against Money Laundering, Review from the Perspective of Law Number 8 of 2010 Lolo, Ferdinand T. Andi
LAW REVIEW Vol 11, No 2 (2011)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Bisnis perbankan adalah bisnis kepercayaan. Ketika bank kehilangan kepercayaan nasabahnya maka ia sedang berjalan menuju keruntuhan. Tidak heran di masa lalu bank sangat menjaga ketat kerahasiaan informasi terkait nasabahnya dengan menutup akses baik terhadap pihak ketiga pada umumnya maupun dari aparat hukum pada khususnya dengan menggunakan “kerahasiaan bank” sebagai alasan utama. Namun demikian masih ada celah bagi bank untuk mengenyampingkan kerahasiaan bank ini sehingga informasi nasabah mereka dapat diakses oleh pihak ketiga yang terkait, termasuk juga para penegak hukum. Hukum perbankan Indonesia mengatur tentang kerahasiaan bank dengan beberapa perkecualian. Dengan diberlakukannya Undang-undang Nomor 8 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, beberapa perkecualian umum yang dimuat dalam undang-undang perbankan menjadi lebih spesifik dalam undang-undang anti pencucian uang. Berdasarkan undang-undang ini prinsip kerahasiaan bank dikesampingkan dalam hal tindak pidana yang terkait dengan pencucian uang. Bank sebagai pihak pelapor adanya transaksi yang mencurigakan kepada PPATK, selaku otoritas dalam pencucian uang, mendapat imunitas ganda namun imunitas tersebut hanya berlaku dalam keadaan tertentu, yaitu bila pihak pelapor menjalankan kewajibannya berlandaskan itikad baik (good faith) dan tidak ada pelampauan wewenang (ultra vires) dalam proses pelaporan tersebut.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2

 1 

Filter by Year

2011 2011


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 25 Issue 1 (March 2025) Volume 24 Issue 2 (November 2024) Volume 24 Issue 1 (March 2024) Volume 23 Issue 2 (November 2023) Volume 23 No. 2 (November 2023) Volume XXII, No. 3 - March 2023 Volume XXIII, No. 1 - July 2023 Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022 Volume XXII, No. 2 - November 2022 Volume XXII, No. 1 - July 2022 Volume XX, No. 3 - March 2021 Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021 Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021 Volume XIX, No. 3 - March 2020 Volume XX, No. 2 - November 2020 Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020 Volume XVIII, No. 3 - March 2019 Volume XIX, No. 2 - November 2019 Volume XIX, No. 1 - July 2019 Volume XVII, No. 3 - March 2018 Volume XVIII, No. 2 - November 2018 Volume XVIII, No. 1 - July 2018 Vol 11, No 2 (2011) Vol 11, No 1 (2011) Vol 6, No 2 (2006) Vol 6, No 1 (2006) Vol 5, No 3 (2006) Vol 5, No 2 (2005) Vol 5, No 1 (2005) Vol 4, No 3 (2005) Vol 4, No 2 (2004) Vol 4, No 1 (2004) Vol 3, No 3 (2004) Vol 2, No 3 (2003) Vol 2, No 2 (2002) Vol 2, No 1 (2002) Vol 1, No 3 (2002) Vol 1, No 2 (2001) Vol 1, No 1 (2001) More Issue