cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Agro Ekonomi
ISSN : 02158787     EISSN : 25411616     DOI : -
AE is a media for dissemination information of thinking and research from lecturers, researchers, students, and practitioners who are interest to produce the scientific work in the agricultural and natural resource policies, agribusiness and agricultural extension & communication sciences. The focus and scopes of the articles in this journal are : (1) The macro approach of agricultural socio economic as a system which comprehensive and integrated from subsystems up-stream, subsystems on-farm, subsystems down-stream, subsystems support and the impact of their interrelationships with government policy, international economics, agricultural marketing, environmental resources, agricultural extension and communication, agricultural sociology, farmer institutions, and community empowerment; (2) The micro approach includes the study in the development of agribusiness (finance, farm management, functional and technical aspects) and agricultural local institutional.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004" : 6 Documents clear
Profitabilitas dan efisiensi usahatani jagung (Kasus di Desa Kadipaten Kecamatan Kadipaten Kabupaten Tasikmalaya) Djoni Djoni; Srie Yuniatun
Agro Ekonomi Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (620.793 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16742

Abstract

The increase in demand of corn exceeds the increase in its production in Indonesia resulting on increasing rate of annual import. It opens the opportunity for farmers to increase production either through intensification or area expansion (extensification).A research conducted in Kadipaten Village, Kecamatan Kadipaten Kabupaten Tasikmalaya aimed to find out: (1) farmer's benefit from corn farming, (2) value of domestic cost ratio of corn farming, and (3) value changes of the domestic cost ratio of corn farming resulted from the changes of input costs, fertilizer and labor wages.A survey method was used on corn farming offarmer group of Wargi Saluyu in the Kadipaten Village. 28 sample farmers are taken randomly from 187 farmers. The data were then analyzed using Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) by elaborating the domestic resource cost ratio (DRCR).The results.showed that:( 1 )Corn farming carried out by farmer group of Wargi Saluyu in the Kadipaten Village, based both on market and social prices was beneficial. It was indicated with the benefit value greater than zero. The benefit from one hectare land area in one production period at the market price was Rp 682,433 or Rp 136 per kilogram and at social price was Rp 2,666,080 or Rp 532 per kilogram.(2)The domestic resource cost ratio was less than one, 0.46, it mean that one unit increase of value added needs 0.46 unit of domestic cost, and indicated that the corn farming run by the group farmer was efficient.(3)The changes of output prices, labor wages, and fertilizer cost by 15 percent showed that the corn farming had a high stability, indicated with the DRCR value remained less than one. The simultaneous decrease and increase of output prices, the increase of labor wages and fertilizer price by 15 percent suggested that the corn farming was economically efficient.
KAJIAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERPENGARUH TERHADAP KEBERHASILAN KELOMPOK TANI SEBAGAI UNIT USAHA/BISNIS Sunarru Samsi Hariadi
Agro Ekonomi Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (600.736 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16775

Abstract

In Indonesia, the activity of agricultural development is very much emphasized through the effort of human resources (HR) empowerment, in which this effort is done through agricultural extension including farmer group approach. In 1993, Martaatmadja (1993) recorded that there were 250,000 farmer groups in Indonesia, but the only active ones were 20 percent of them. In 2000, in Gunungkidul Regency , it was recorded that there were 1446 farmer groups, in which the active ones are for instance the main class as calculated to be about 10.46 percent . Active farmer groups which were able success in the activity of business unit less than 10 percent.This research is meant to study the factors influencing the successs of farmer groups as business unit. The research was done in Gunungkidul Regency by using the method of survey, with groups as its unit of analysis, and there were 90 farmer groups as sample taken by the method of Stratified Random Sampling. Each group was represented by 5 members taken randomly as group representatives, including 1 member of the board (no the chairman), 2 developed/ active farmers, and 2 regular/ less active farmers. The resulting data of the research were analysed using multiple regression, using computer program of SPSS. Then, analysis was developed through path analysis, using computer program ofAmos.The result of this research shows that factors influencing the success farmer groups as business unit were: self efficacy ofmembers of groups, interaction among members, and leadership style of chairman of groups.The success of groups as business units generally evidenced in middle and main class offarmer groups, with the conduct of certain activities: agricultural equipment rental (sprayer, diesel water pump machine, etc), stalls owned by group, cooperatives owned by groups, livestock/ fisheries owned by groups, partnership with companies, etc.
Pendekatan Model Komunikasi, Partisipasi Kelompok dalam Adopsi Inovasi Agribisnis Ternak Kambing PE di Girikerto - Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Hano Hanafi; Soemardjo Soemardjo; Amirudin Saleh; Ida Yuhana
Agro Ekonomi Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (517.853 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16743

Abstract

The essence of the participatory development is to encourage society to behave independently in all fields. This mean that it is need an interaction and interdependency ofall the parties involved in the development, including government, society and private institutions, to mobilise the energy and the sources given in the society. This research was conducted to support the implementation of innovation of PE sheep agribusiness in the group level in Girikerto, Sleman Regency. This research aimed at knowing the effective group communication model in the adoption and innovation of the PE sheep agribusiness, and to knowing the level of participation of the groups' members in the adoption and innovation of the PE sheep agribusiness.This research was conducted in Girikerto village, Turi Sub-regency, Sleman Regency of Yogyakarta Province in the period of August – November 2001. The analysis units in the research were individual members of breeder group of PE sheep in Girikerto village. The studied groups was set "purposively" with the consideration of the improvement level of breeder group in the implementation of the innovation of PE sheep agribusiness. The selected group was breeder group of "Pangestu" (as the relatively advanced breeder group) and the breeder group of "Sukorejo" (as the relatively less developed breeder group). The respondents who were selected as samples constitute of Pangestu group by 59 individuals, and the members ofSukorejo group were 21 individual. Then, the total respondents in this research were 80 individuals. This research conducted through survey in the 80 breeders. The variables studied were breeder characteristic, participatory level of the groups' member Data obtained was analysing using computer-based SPSS method.The result of the research suggesting that the communication model occurred in the breeder groups, in the adoption and innovation of the PE sheep, was throughout the interpersonal communication and small group communication, which frequently called group communication. Contact person from which the information derived was an opinion leader, who was the groups' chief followed by the groups' staff andfnally to all of the members of the groups. The adoption and the innovation of the PE sheep agribusiness in the breeder group was more effective with participatory model from all of the groups' members, beginning with the planning, and then the implementation, and finally the evaluation and the employment of the result, according to the knowledge, skill and the sources given in the area.
BESARAN STOK CADANGAN BERAS UNTUK INDONESIA M. Husein Sawit
Agro Ekonomi Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (514.088 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16744

Abstract

Almost all Asian countries, including Indonesia, adopt rice reserve stock policy. The purpose of the policy is to reduce food insecurity risk due to natural calamity and man-made disaster, as well as to stabilize rice price. In the last 20 years, Bulog has maintained rice reserve stock to I million tons for those purposes. The last few years, the environments have changed rapidly due to expanding of transportation and telecommunication, rice trade now has became more transparent, and market information more perfectly. Rice policy in Indonesia has also changed rapidly since 1998. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the optimum size of rice reserve for Indonesia by applying 3 approaches, namely, NFA (National Food Authority) of the Philippines, Stock to Utilization Ratio of FAO, and Usual Marketing Requirement. It is found that the size of rice reserve should be 0.75 million tons at the lowest and 3.4 million ton at the highest. The results were compared to rice released for emergency and price stabilization purposes by Bulog, and released for emergency purposes by NGO, and bilateral (G to G. It is concluded that Indonesia only needs 0.750 million tons of rice for reserve stock. This size of reserve includes rice reserve stock for East Asian/ Asean Rice Reserve System.
BANK CREDIT, CREDIT RISKAND FARM PRODUCE Muyanja Ssenyonga
Agro Ekonomi Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1124.578 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16755

Abstract

The research investigates the determinants and impact of bank credit on output in the food crops and fisheries sub sectors; whether or not there is a significant difference in the risk on bank credit and output in the two sub sectors, and whether or not there is a relationship between risk obtaining in the two sub sectors. The results indicate the positive and significant influence of bank credit on food crops output, but a positive and insignificant influence on fisheries output, which unequivocally vindicates government intervention in credit disbursement to agriculture. The influence of banking deregulation on bank credit supply is shown to differ between the two sub sectors, for while it registers expected positive sign in the fisheries sub sector, it produces negative and insignificant influence in the food crops sub sector. Bank reserve requirements has a negative influence on bank credit extended to the fisheries sub sector, while it induces a positive and significant influence in the food crops sub sector. The 1997 economic crisis causes an autonomous contraction of bank credit to the food crops sub sector, but accentuates it in the fisheries sub sector. The food crops and fisheries sub sectors register significant influence of rate of interest rate on bank credit on bank credit supply. Obstacles to credit disbursement to the two sub sectors are presented, followed by policy implications deemed necessary to improve the credit situation in the agricultural sector.
Analisis daya saing komoditas kedelai di sentra produksi=(The Analysis the Competitiveness on Soybean Commodities in Cente Soetrion Soetrion
Agro Ekonomi Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (442.201 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16756

Abstract

The main objectives of this paper are to investigate the government pric policy and its implication on the soybean farming competitiveness; and formu late policy alternatives to enhance the soybean commodity competitiveness i agro-industry sector. This study was conducted in soybean farming center at th Grajagan Village, Purwohardjo district, Banyuwangi regency. The site was Se lected based on the Location Quotient analysis. The research method.used i this study is Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). The result of the study are as follows price policy of the soybean commodity system could produce production surplu hy 4 %. This surplus enables producers to compete in the domestic market. 7 face the free trade, this policy could only achieve potential income of farming b 77 % and tempe-tofu industry by 91 %. With the current price policy, the soybea commodity still has an advantage showed by the comparative advantage wit the DRCsodaivalue of Rp 6.253 and domestic resource cost coefficient (CDRCria value of 0.67 as well as competitive advantage with the value of R, 6.888 and the domestic resource cost coefficient (CDRC,,,,,,,,,) value of 0.74. Gal eminent price policy for soybean commodity does not provide incentive for th development of the tempe-tofu industry. This is shown by the Effective Protectio and Profitability Coefficients (EPC and PC) which is less than 1 and the nega tive Subsidy Ratio to Producers (SRP) for both farming and agro-industry. An other policy alternative for increasing the soybean commodity competitivenes in agro-industry development is by increasing the productivity and output pric protection at the farmers level. Another policy alternative is the subsidy of fertil izer and pesticide whenever other countries have the same policy.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6


Filter by Year

2004 2004


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 36, No 2 (2025): DECEMBER 2025 Vol 36, No 1 (2025): JUNE 2025 Vol 36 (2025): ARTICLE IN PRESS Vol 35, No 2 (2024): DECEMBER 2024 Vol 35, No 1 (2024): JUNE 2024 Vol 34, No 2 (2023): DECEMBER 2023 Vol 34, No 1 (2023): JUNE 2023 Vol 33, No 2 (2022): DECEMBER 2022 Vol 33, No 1 (2022): JUNE 2022 Vol 32, No 2 (2021): DECEMBER 2021 Vol 32, No 1 (2021): JUNE 2021 Vol 31, No 2 (2020): DECEMBER 2020 Vol 31, No 1 (2020): JUNE 2020 Vol 30, No 2 (2019): DECEMBER 2019 Vol 30, No 1 (2019): JUNE 2019 Vol 29, No 2 (2018): DECEMBER 2018 Vol 29, No 1 (2018): JUNE 2018 Vol 28, No 2 (2017): DECEMBER 2017 Vol 28, No 1 (2017): JUNI 2017 Vol 27, No 2 (2016): DESEMBER 2016 Vol 27, No 1 (2016): JUNI 2016 Vol 26, No 2 (2015): DESEMBER 2015 Vol 26, No 1 (2015): JUNI 2015 Vol 25, No 2 (2014): DESEMBER 2014 Vol 25, No 1 (2014): JUNI 2014 Vol 24, No 2 (2013): DESEMBER 2013 Vol 24, No 1 (2013): JUNI 2013 Vol 18, No 1 (2011): JUNI 2011 Vol 17, No 2 (2010): DESEMBER 2010 Vol 17, No 1 (2010): JUNI 2010 Vol 15, No 2 (2008): DESEMBER 2008 Vol 15, No 1 (2008): JUNI 2008 Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007 Vol 13, No 2 (2006): DESEMBER 2006 Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005 Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004 Vol 11, No 1 (2004): JUNI 2004 Vol 10, No 2 (2003): DESEMBER 2003 Vol 10, No 1 (2003): JUNI 2003 Vol 9, No 2 (2002): DESEMBER 2002 Vol 9, No 1 (2002): JUNI 2002 Vol 8, No 2 (2001): DESEMBER 2001 Vol 8, No 1 (2001): JUNI 2001 Vol 7, No 1 (2000): JUNI 2000 Vol 6, No 2 (1999): DESEMBER 1999 Vol 6, No 1 (1999): JUNI 1999 Vol 4, No 2 (1994): DESEMBER 1994 No 5 (1990): 1990 Vol 9, No 1 (1988) No 4 (1986): 1986 No 12 (1979): 1979 No 11 (1978): 1978 No 3 (1978): 1978 More Issue