cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Agro Ekonomi
ISSN : 02158787     EISSN : 25411616     DOI : -
AE is a media for dissemination information of thinking and research from lecturers, researchers, students, and practitioners who are interest to produce the scientific work in the agricultural and natural resource policies, agribusiness and agricultural extension & communication sciences. The focus and scopes of the articles in this journal are : (1) The macro approach of agricultural socio economic as a system which comprehensive and integrated from subsystems up-stream, subsystems on-farm, subsystems down-stream, subsystems support and the impact of their interrelationships with government policy, international economics, agricultural marketing, environmental resources, agricultural extension and communication, agricultural sociology, farmer institutions, and community empowerment; (2) The micro approach includes the study in the development of agribusiness (finance, farm management, functional and technical aspects) and agricultural local institutional.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007" : 6 Documents clear
PENGARUH DAYADUKUNG LAHAN DAN FAKTOR SOSIAL EKONOMI TERHADAP PERILAKU PETANI DALAM KONSERVASI LAHAN SAWAH DI KABUPATEN KULON PROGO Dian Kurniasih; Roso Witjaksono; Jamhari Jamhari
Agro Ekonomi Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (353.502 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16738

Abstract

The research aimed to determine: (1)farmer s behavior on wet land conservations in Kulon Progo Regency (2) Tht:impact of land carrying capacity and socio economicfactors tofarmer s behavior on wet land conservations, and (3) The impact offarmer s behavior on wet land conservations to their agribusiness income.The method used in this study was descriptive analysis. The research was done in Kulon Progo Regency, especially in Nanggulan and Kokap Sub District. The locations chose bypurposive sampling method to represent area that have high level of land carrying capacity and low level of land carrying capacity. The respondents chose by multistage random sampling method. Farmers behavior on wet land conservations measured with Proportion Test by Dajan. Therefore, the impact of land carrying capacity and socio economicfactors to farmer s behavior on wet land conservations, and the impact of farmer s behavior on wet land conservations to the farmer s agribusiness income measured with multiple linear regression analysis.The results indicated that more than 50%farmers in Kulon Progo regency have a high level of conservations behavior, especially in vegetative methods. Mechanics methods were in middle level. The level of land carrying capacity did not influence farmer's behavior on wet land conservations. Farmers in both area have a high level behavior on wet land conservations. Thesocio economicfactors influenced thefarmer s behavior on wet land conservations significantly were age, conservation knowledge, motivation, activity in group, non agribusiness income, availability of organics input and leadership. The high level of farmer s behavior on wet land conservations did not influence their agribusiness income. But the relationship was positive, the more increase offarmer s behavioronwetland conservations, themore farmer s agribusiness income.Key words: Land Carrying Capacity, Socio Economic Factors, WetLand Conservations, Agribusiness Income
DANA PELAYANAN UMUM: SUDAH REPRESENT ATIFKAH KEBIJAKAN BANTUAN DOMESTIK INDONESIA DI SEKTOR PERT ANIAN? Sri Nuryanti; Frans B.M Dabukke
Agro Ekonomi Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (408.384 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16739

Abstract

Domestic Support that included in Green Box is other term of support for farmer in according to agricultural and rural development. So far, developing countries' domestic support is limited. Among General services becomes the most important one among domestic support items. Regarding to competitiveness improvement, domestic support policy is being non-pricefactor of productivity and efficiency improvement. As most budgets are decentralized to local level, gene FaI services becomes important onefor agricultural and rural developments. Nonetheless, necessary to analyze and calculate the magnitude of domestic support which related to general services of green boxfor national and local level. The budget of Indonesian domestic support during 2001-2005 tended to increase. The highest percentage of budget was allocatedfor domesticfood aidfor the needy. Thenfollow by stockholding for food security, general services, and dissaster relief Calculation on wethergeneral services and domestic support budgetfor national level not aggregately accounted local levelyet. The nominal value did not reflect the real allocations. The calculation of green box budget aspart of domestic support has ignored role of general services. General services budget has been most allocated for infrastructure, research, pest and disease control, and promotion and marketing activities. On local level, only 29 per cent budget allocated for general services. Three largest components were allocated for infrastucture, extention, and promotion and marketing activities.
DAMP AI( HAMBATAN NON-TARIF TERHADAP PERMINT AAN EKSPOR UDANG INDONESIA KE UNI EROPA Toni Kuswoyo; Dwidjono Hadi Darwanto; Slamet Hartono
Agro Ekonomi Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (550.952 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16740

Abstract

This research was aimed to determine theforms of the non-tarifbarrier and its impact to the Indonesian shrimp export demand to the European Union (EU), beside the other factors as constructor of demand function. This research used secondary data (lime series) during 23 years (1984-2006): shrimp export volume (Qd), shrimp export price (Px), domestic shrimp price (Pd), crab export price (Pk), exchange rate from the importing countries, and commerce regulations which is peiformed by EU as dummy variables. The data collected from DKP, BPS, Depdag, internet, and other relevant institutions. Peculiarly, the dummy variable grouped into 6 groups: RASFF (DI), contaminant (D2), certain substances & residues (D3), health conditions & food hVf!iene rules (D4), HCCP (D5), and marketinf! standards (D6).This research used the multiple regression analysis model, with the tolerant time (!gg) I year from tfor several dummy variables. Analysis were conducted at 6 markets: UE as a whole, Dutch, United Kingdom (UK), French, Germany, and Belgia and Luxemburg. Testing of the classical assumptions conducted by the econometric criterions is covering the economic and statistic criterions. The estimation of the regression parameters conducted by the smallest square method (ordinarv least SQuare. OLS) and model repaired as the effect of existence of the first order autocorrelation by a comand "auto". The equation model related to the Coob-Douglas model, was transformed into the natural logarithm model in order to easiZv analyzed in package program of statistics.Result of the analysis indicated that the commerce regulations applied by the EU, which its vary to each state, entirely has the negative impact to the Indonesian shrimp export to the UE, except D4 for the UK that shown the positive impact. Several regulations known newly indicated the effect which itsformed into Jgg or its impact is newly felt I year after the regulations enter into force. Thefact strengthen the assumption that applying of commerce regulations by the UE can be the disguised restriction to trade, in this case included to the non tarifbarrier. The sixth groups of the regulationswere very related to the food security and traceability aspect, or in its bearing with the WTO agreements were very related to the SPS and TBT aspect. This invention also strengthen the assumption that non-tarif barrier which newly developed by the advanced countries to control the importation from the other countries were deal with the food security and traceability aspect, or the SPS and TBT aspect. The quantitative non- tarif barrier, example import quota or embargo, were rarer in used. Ap-parently, the EU doesn't wishtoooutspokenin theeffort to control its commerce with the other countries.Realizedor not, in thepresentnon-tarif barrier haveimportantposition to determinewhetheror not thefluent of theinternational trade
ANALISIS KONSUMSI BERAS PADATINGKAT RUMAH TANGGA DI PROPINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA Cristovao R; Slamet Hartono; Jangkung Handoyo Mulyo
Agro Ekonomi Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16734

Abstract

The objectives of the study were (1) to determine thefactors influencing rice consumption in urban and rural areas of Yogyakarta Special Province and (2) to determine the own price, cross price and income elasticity of rice consumption at different income levels in rural and urban areas. National Socio-Economic Survey (SUSENAS) data of 2005 Yogyakarta Special Province on rice consumption was used Totalrespondents 1990 households. Regression model used in the analysis was OLS. The result showed that thefactors that influence the consumption of rice are the price of the rice itself, price of the related household goods, income level, education of the mother, number offamily members, and location. Thefactors that individually influence rice consumption vary by kinds of rice, location, and income level. Therefore, the demand of rice in DIY is inelastic, the change of price did not significantly influence rice demand. Generally, rice is normal good at low income household level in the rural and urban areas andfor middle income in the rural, and in middle income and high income in the urban, rice is a inferior good. In other side, rice is Substituted for cassava and sweet potato. Rice is complementary for catfish, fermented soybean cake, cassava, egg, and tofu.Keywords: rice consumption, elasticity, substitution, complementary.
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANGMEMPENGARUID PERMINTAAN KREDIT SEKTOR PERTANIAN DAN KONTRIBUSI SEKTOR PERTANIAN TERHADAP PEREKONOMIAN NASIONAL Triandy Meinardi; Slamet Hartono
Agro Ekonomi Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (502.095 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16741

Abstract

This research aims to knowfactors influencing demand of agricultural credit and to know how much agricultural sector contribution to growth of national economics. This research use a time series data of 1980 -2006 obtained from various sources like Badan Pusat Statistik, Bank Indonesia and other related institution and also some related website. Analytical method use table analysis to know the contribution of agricultural sector to growth national economics and linear regression analysis to know thefactors influencing demand of agricultural credit. The result of this research indicates that agricultural sector formerly the biggest contributor of Indonesian economics in 1980-1991, but to lack the second after processing industry in 1991-2001 and become the third biggest after processing industry and trading, restaurant and hotel in 2001-2006. The factors influencing demand of agricultural credit are inflation rate, the rate of interest, economies growth, agricultural labour, agricultural export, import and gold price.
ANALISIS KEBERAGAMAN USAHA RUMAHT ANGGA PERTANIAN DI LAHAN MARJINAL Dewa K.S Swastika; Roosganda Elizabeth; Juni Hestina
Agro Ekonomi Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (487.893 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16737

Abstract

Most of farmers in Indonesia, especially in marginal land. are small scale farmers with limited resources. These limitations have caused low level of technology application, thus low productivity and low income. To meet their household consumption. they have to find other job for additional income earning. This study is aimed to: (1) to assess the model offarming system, (2) to evaluate the variability of household's income, (3) to assess the contribution of on-farm, off-farm and non-farm incomes on the total household's income, and (4) to assess the degree of relationship between household characteristic and job variability. The study was conducted in three marginal land, namely: rain-fed in WestJava, dry-land in Bali, and swampy land in WestKalimantan. The results showed thatfarmers in rain-fed of WestJava and swampy land of WestKalimantan were doing partial farming, whilefarmers in dryland of Bali were doing integrated farming system. Farmers in these three agroecosystem were diversified in sources of income. On-farm was the highest source of household's income,followed by non-farm and off-farm. However, there is no significant correlation betweenjob diversification and level ofhousehold's income. It might be that thejob diversification was mainly done by small farmers whose on-farm income alone could not meet their household's consumption. Meanwhile, largefarmers did lessjob. Hence, at the end their household's income was not significantly different. The high contribution of agricultural sector on household's income indicated its high role on rural economy. Therefore, this sector should be developed in an integrated development, includedfarming system development,partnership betweenfarmers and private sector, gro-industrial development, and infrastructure development. It is expected that these integrated development will create marketfor agricultural products, job opportunity for rural people, and finally will improve household's income and welfare.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6


Filter by Year

2007 2007


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 36, No 2 (2025): DECEMBER 2025 Vol 36, No 1 (2025): JUNE 2025 Vol 36 (2025): ARTICLE IN PRESS Vol 35, No 2 (2024): DECEMBER 2024 Vol 35, No 1 (2024): JUNE 2024 Vol 34, No 2 (2023): DECEMBER 2023 Vol 34, No 1 (2023): JUNE 2023 Vol 33, No 2 (2022): DECEMBER 2022 Vol 33, No 1 (2022): JUNE 2022 Vol 32, No 2 (2021): DECEMBER 2021 Vol 32, No 1 (2021): JUNE 2021 Vol 31, No 2 (2020): DECEMBER 2020 Vol 31, No 1 (2020): JUNE 2020 Vol 30, No 2 (2019): DECEMBER 2019 Vol 30, No 1 (2019): JUNE 2019 Vol 29, No 2 (2018): DECEMBER 2018 Vol 29, No 1 (2018): JUNE 2018 Vol 28, No 2 (2017): DECEMBER 2017 Vol 28, No 1 (2017): JUNI 2017 Vol 27, No 2 (2016): DESEMBER 2016 Vol 27, No 1 (2016): JUNI 2016 Vol 26, No 2 (2015): DESEMBER 2015 Vol 26, No 1 (2015): JUNI 2015 Vol 25, No 2 (2014): DESEMBER 2014 Vol 25, No 1 (2014): JUNI 2014 Vol 24, No 2 (2013): DESEMBER 2013 Vol 24, No 1 (2013): JUNI 2013 Vol 18, No 1 (2011): JUNI 2011 Vol 17, No 2 (2010): DESEMBER 2010 Vol 17, No 1 (2010): JUNI 2010 Vol 15, No 2 (2008): DESEMBER 2008 Vol 15, No 1 (2008): JUNI 2008 Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007 Vol 13, No 2 (2006): DESEMBER 2006 Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005 Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004 Vol 11, No 1 (2004): JUNI 2004 Vol 10, No 2 (2003): DESEMBER 2003 Vol 10, No 1 (2003): JUNI 2003 Vol 9, No 2 (2002): DESEMBER 2002 Vol 9, No 1 (2002): JUNI 2002 Vol 8, No 2 (2001): DESEMBER 2001 Vol 8, No 1 (2001): JUNI 2001 Vol 7, No 1 (2000): JUNI 2000 Vol 6, No 2 (1999): DESEMBER 1999 Vol 6, No 1 (1999): JUNI 1999 Vol 4, No 2 (1994): DESEMBER 1994 No 5 (1990): 1990 Vol 9, No 1 (1988) No 4 (1986): 1986 No 12 (1979): 1979 No 11 (1978): 1978 No 3 (1978): 1978 More Issue