cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 14104946     EISSN : 25027883     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP) is an open access, and peer-reviewed journal. Our main goal is to disseminate current and original articles from researchers and practitioners on various contemporary social and political issues: gender politics and identity, digital society and disruption, civil society movement, community welfare, social development, citizenship and public management, public policy innovation, international politics & security, media, information & literacy, politics, governance & democracy, radicalism and terrorism. JSP is published three times a year.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July" : 7 Documents clear
A Philosophical Reading of Jacques Rancière through the Political Freedom of Democracy Enlightenment Debora Silalahi, Artha; Silalahi, Suandi
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.87636

Abstract

This paper explores Jacques Rancière’s philosophical perspective on democracy, focusing on how his ideas challenge conventional understandings of political freedom and democratic order. Rather than viewing democracy as a fixed system with clear rules and outcomes, Rancière presents it as an ongoing, often disruptive process rooted in the assertion of political will. Through a critical-philosophical approach, this paper examines how Rancière’s thought sheds light on the tensions between law, political participation, and individual autonomy. It argues that democracy, for Rancière, is defined not by institutional structures but by the continuous struggle over who gets to speak, act, and be recognised in the political space. This reading reveals the unresolved and fragile nature of democratic life, where freedom and order are in constant negotiation. By situating Rancière within broader debates on political theory and democratic practice, the paper highlights how his critique opens new ways of thinking about the ethical and political challenges of contemporary democracy. In doing so, it also raises questions about how democratic ideals from the past can still hold value in addressing present-day issues, even as their meanings evolve. Ultimately, the paper argues that Rancière’s view encourages a more dynamic and inclusive understanding of democracy—one that remains open to rethinking and renewal.
Problems and Challenges of Suku Anak Dalam in the 2019 General Election: A Policy Recommendation Hertanto, Hertanto; Maryanah, Tabah; Warganegara, Arizka
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.90036

Abstract

In a democracy, the state is obligated to guarantee citizens’ political rights, particularly the right to vote and to run (and be elected) in any general election. However, case studies in four districts of Jambi Province (Batanghari, Sarolangun, Tebo, and Merangin) reveal the opposite. Many members of the Suku Anak Dalam (SAD) community were excluded from the permanent voter list, effectively depriving them of their constitutional right to vote. This study investigates what causes this exclusion and offers relevant policy recommendations. The interviews with key informants identified several underlying causes in the 2019 elections: the absence of identity cards, low levels of literacy and education, poor economic conditions, and various technical obstacles. Other barriers included the lack of special polling stations and non-inclusive voting procedures. These findings suggest the need to strengthen education and literacy programs and establish accessible polling stations, as well as more inclusive voting procedures for the SAD community.
Yudhoyono and Jokowi's Political Leadership in Indonesia: A Comparison of Vision, Communication, Longevity, and Election's Success Asqori Pohan, Ibnu; Takiyuddin Ismail, Muhamad; Nursyahidah Syed Annuar, Sharifah
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.93503

Abstract

The study aims to assess the political leadership skills of President Yudhoyono and Jokowi in Indonesia from 2004 to 2023, utilising the leadership capital approach. The 'skills' of Yudhoyono and Jokowi's political leadership are examined in terms of their political/policy vision, communication performance, longevity, and re-election triumph. The research utilised primary data obtained through interviews with a select group of predetermined informants and secondary data sourced from news websites, books, and journals. This study reveals that President Yudhoyono's political/ policy vision is more robust and steadfast than President Jokowi's. Yudhoyono's political vision remained consistent and continuous during his first and second terms. However, Jokowi's political vision differed between his first and second terms. Additionally, it was discovered that the two Presidents' performances catered to distinct demographics. Yudhoyono's use of formal and structured language makes him more understandable to the upper-middle class. In contrast, Jokowi's colloquial and less structured vocabulary makes him more approachable to the general population from the lower-middle class. Both presidents were re-elected for two consecutive terms and significantly influenced their respective political parties in garnering the most votes. The Democratic Party's representation in the DPR RI grew by 13 per cent in the 2009 elections, compared to their representation in the parliamentary seats in the 2004 election. Similarly, the PDIP party achieved success in both the 2014 and 2019 Elections. The PDIP had a marginal 3 per cent increase in the number of seats obtained in the 2014 elections.
Understanding Public Perception Made Easy: A Sentiment Analysis of Public Transportation Services Rachmawati, Tutik; Kahfi Nugraha, Haris
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.100206

Abstract

Public policy evaluations are often constrained by traditional methods that require significant time and resources, limiting their timeliness and impact. This research explores the use of X (formerly Twitter ) sentiment analysis to evaluate public perceptions of TransJakarta services, addressing the shortcomings of conventional survey-based approaches. The study contributes to academic literature on big data in public administration and offers policymakers a faster and more inclusive method of capturing citizen perspectives. Using X data collected from September 2023 to May 2024, sentiment analysis was conducted using VADER and TextBlob, supported by complementary techniques including word frequency analysis, word clouds, and comparative analysis. The findings reveal that public sentiment fluctuates in response to service disruptions. Notable discrepancies between the VADER and TextBlob classifications indicate the value and necessity of manual validation. In contrast to earlier studies that employed complex models less accessible to practitioners, this study presents a simplified yet robust approach to big-data-driven evaluation, making sentiment analysis more practical for policy monitoring and improvement.
Philanthropy among the Poor: Social Welfare Insights from the Family Hope Program Beneficiaries in Indonesia Hatma Indra Jaya, Pajar; Saptoni, Saptoni
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.100207

Abstract

To address social welfare issues, governments require public participation through philanthropic activities. As philanthropy is often viewed as the domain of the wealthy, many studies focus on elite philanthropy, with only few examining the contributions of the poor. Despite their circumstances, people in poverty have the potential to engage in philanthropic activities. Recent research indicates that individuals experiencing poverty can indeed become philanthropists. This study gathered information from beneficiaries of the Family Hope Program (Program Keluarga Harapan, PKH), a social assistance initiative for poor households in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The findings reveal that philanthropic practices exist among the poor, albeit with distinct characteristics compared to those of the wealthy. Three key differences distinguish the philanthropy of the poor from that of the rich: form, motive, and effectiveness. Wealthy philanthropists typically donate substantial amounts of money or goods, whereas poor philanthropists offer a variety of contributions, including small amounts of money, goods, free assistance, lending household appliances, time, and even prayers. Many scholarly works show that wealthy individuals tend to engage in philanthropy during significant social welfare crises that attract public attention. In contrast, poor philanthropists are active whenever a community member faces social welfare issues. Instead of economic or political incentives, the motives for philanthropic activities among the poor stem from spiritual fervour and communal culture. Although the economic value of their contributions may be minimal, the philanthropy of low-income individuals effectively addresses welfare issues within their communities.
Explaining the Dynamic Hedging Policy of the Duterte Administration Amid the Sino-US Rivalry Fauzan Rizki, Muhammad
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.101104

Abstract

This article explains the dynamics of Duterte’s foreign policy in responding to geopolitical uncertainty in Southeast Asia. The Philippines’ geopolitical alignment toward China shifted during his administration, marking a significant break in its foreign policy history. The Duterte administration has also been distancing the Philippines from the United States. As a result, the Philippines' foreign policy orientation began to view its relations with the two powers more pragmatically. Using hedging as an analytical framework and a qualitative-deductive method of analysis, this article argues that the Duterte administration adopted a hedging-oriented foreign policy shaped by both the structural climate and domestic socio-bureaucratic considerations. Furthermore, his approach reflected strong policy dynamism, marked by flexible and anticipatory shifts in alignment during the latter half of his administration in response to perceived risks and opportunities.
Sustainable Tourism Leadership: A Collaborative Approach to Drive Ecosystem and Accelerate Innovation in Indonesia Teguh Akbari, Taufan; Paras Ayu, Jati; Raif Khadijah, Siti Adelita; Reevany Bustami, Mohammad
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.101713

Abstract

Tourism is a key contributor to Indonesia's GDP. Although the sector experienced major setbacks during the pandemic, it has since shown signs of recovery with notable achievements. One of the critical success factors involved in such a rebound is leadership. At the same time, the pandemic highlighted the importance of building a more sustainable tourism climate. While existing frameworks to create sustainable tourism mainly focus on technical and governance aspects, less attention has been given to the role of leadership. This research, therefore, examines how leadership enhances sustainable tourism in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach to dig deeper into the perspectives of tourism industry players, from the government, NGOs, academics, and local communities, using Focus Group Discussion (FGD) coupled with a literature review. The findings show that various challenges in sustainable tourism leadership hinder its maximum growth. While innovation has become at the forefront of sustainable tourism stakeholders in Indonesia, it is still isolated from a bigger sustainable tourism ecosystem. Leadership frameworks should enhance, accelerate innovation, and spur ecosystem creation. This research provides a theoretical contribution to leadership literature, particularly the role of sustainable tourism leaders in improving the sustainable tourism climate. Practically, this research informs leaders in implementing their blueprint to create a robust, sustainable tourism industry.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July Vol 28, No 3 (2025): March Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November Vol 28, No 1 (2024): July Vol 27, No 3 (2024): March Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November Vol 27, No 1 (2023): July Vol 26, No 3 (2023): March Vol 26, No 2 (2022): November Vol 26, No 1 (2022): July Vol 25, No 3 (2022): March Vol 25, No 2 (2021): November Vol 25, No 1 (2021): July Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November Vol 24, No 1 (2020): July Vol 23, No 3 (2020): March Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November Vol 23, No 1 (2019): July Vol 22, No 3 (2019): March Vol 22, No 2 (2018): November Vol 22, No 1 (2018): July Vol 21, No 3 (2018): March Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November Vol 21, No 1 (2017): July Vol 20, No 3 (2017): March Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November Vol 20, No 1 (2016): Juli Vol 19, No 3 (2016): Maret Vol 19, No 2 (2015): NOVEMBER Vol 19, No 1 (2015): JULI Vol 18, No 3 (2015): Maret Vol 18, No 2 (2014): November Vol 18, No 1 (2014): Juli Vol 17, No 3 (2014): Maret Vol 17, No 2 (2013): NOVEMBER (Korporasi dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial) Vol 17, No 1 (2013): JULI (Menimbang Birokrasi, Partai, dan Politik di Indonesia) Vol 16, No 3 (2013): MARET (Gerakan Sosial (Baru) Pasca “Orde Baru”) Vol 16, No 2 (2012): NOVEMBER (Mengelola Perbatasan Negara) Vol 16, No 1 (2012): JULI (Politik Pengelolaan Lingkungan dan Sumber Daya Alam) Vol 15, No 3 (2012): MARET (Dinamika Politik Desentralisasi) Vol 15, No 2 (2011): NOVEMBER (Dilema Tata Kelola Pemerintahan) Vol 15, No 1 (2011): JULI (Kebijakan Sosial di Aras Lokal) Vol 14, No 3 (2011): MARET (Membingkai Peran Politik Media) Vol 14, No 2 (2010): NOVEMBER (Membedah Radikalisme di Indonesia) Vol 14, No 1 (2010): JULI (Multikulturalisme dan Pergulatan Identitas) Vol 13, No 3 (2010): MARET (Dinamika Penyelenggaraan Kesejahteraan Sosial) Vol 13, No 2 (2009): NOVEMBER (Demokrasi dan Transformasi Institusi Tradisional) Vol 13, No 1 (2009): JULI (Konflik dan Perdamaian) Vol 12, No 3 (2009): MARET (Parpol dan Pemilu) Vol 12, No 2 (2008): NOVEMBER (Media dan Demokrasi) Vol 12, No 1 (2008): JULI (Gerakan Sosial) Vol 11, No 3 (2008): MARET (Komunikasi Bencana) Vol 11, No 2 (2007): NOVEMBER (Dinamika Politik Lingkungan) Vol 11, No 1 (2007): JULI (Demokrasi Mencari Bentuk) Vol 10, No 3 (2007): MARET (Kebijakan Sosial Politik) Vol 10, No 2 (2006): NOVEMBER (Respon terhadap Tantangan Internasional) Vol 10, No 1 (2006): JULI (Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) Vol 9, No 3 (2006): MARET (Tarik Menarik Kepentingan dalam Media Masa) Vol 9, No 2 (2005): NOVEMBER (Potret Ilmu-ilmu Sosial) Vol 9, No 1 (2005): JULI (Demokrasi: Problema dan Manfaatnya) Vol 8, No 3 (2005): MARET (Democratic Governance) Vol 8, No 2 (2004): NOVEMBER (Tinjauan Kritis Globalisasi) Vol 8, No 1 (2004): JULI (Representasi dan Keberpihakan dalam Media) Vol 7, No 3 (2004): MARET (Peran dan Konstruksi Sosial tentang Perempuan) Vol 7, No 2 (2003): NOVEMBER (Globalisasi dan Kemiskinan) Vol 7, No 1 (2003): JULI (Neolibralisme: Refleksi Kritis) Vol 6, No 3 (2003): MARET (Dinamika Negara dan Masyarakat Sipil) Vol 6, No 2 (2002): NOVEMBER (Perkembangan dan Potret Ilmu Sosial) Vol 6, No 1 (2002): JULI (Kebijakan Publik: Perspektif Alternatif) Vol 5, No 3 (2002): MARET (Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik) Vol 5, No 2 (2001): NOVEMBER (Otonomi Lokal dan Keindonesiaan) Vol 5, No 1 (2001): JULI (Khasanah Gerakan Sosial) Vol 4, No 3 (2001): MARET (Refleksi Nasionalisme Indonesia) Vol 4, No 2 (2000): NOVEMBER (Menggugat Kajian Media dan Kebebasan Pers) Vol 4, No 1 (2000): JULI (Reformasi Kelembagaan Politik) Vol 3, No 3 (2000): MARET (Kekerasan, Keberdayaan, dan Demokrasi) Vol 3, No 2 (1999): NOVEMBER Vol 3, No 1 (1999): JULI Vol 2, No 3 (1999): MARET Vol 2, No 2 (1998): NOVEMBER Vol 2, No 1 (1998): JULI Vol 1, No 3 (1998): MARET Vol 1, No 2 (1997): NOVEMBER Vol 1, No 1 (1997): JULI More Issue