Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal is a peer-reviewed legal journal that provides a forum for scientific papers on legal studies. This journal publishes original research papers relating to several aspects of legal research. The Legal Journal of Ius Quia Iustum beginning in 2018 will be published three times a year in January, May, and September. This journal really opens door access for readers and academics to keep in touch with the latest research findings in the field of law.
Articles
10 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019"
:
10 Documents
clear
Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Pengadaan Alat Kesehatan Di Indonesia
Ahmad Feri Tanjung;
Rizkan Zulyadi;
Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art7
he financial loss of the state is determined by many factors leading the method of calculating the state financial loss to be unstandard and then causing uncertainty in calculation of the state financial loss, including in the procurement of medical devices. This study aims to (a) analyze the factors determining the financial loss of state in the procurement of medical devices and (b) to analyze the method used to calculate the financial loss of the state in the procurement of medical devices. This is a normative juridical research using a conceptual approach and a regulatory approach. The data used were secondary data collected through literature. From the research results, first, it can be concluded that the factors determining the fiancial loss of state in the procurement of medical devices were the factors of goods effectiveness as needed. The procurement of medical devices that has the nature of the goods is a unit to be utilized as needed, and then the method of calculating the financial loss of state used is the method of calculating the total loss, but if the medical devices that have properties can be utilized separately, the calculation of financial losses used is net loss. Another factor affecting was the price reasonableness if the procurement of medical devices can be utilized as needed but the price of medical devices exceeds the reasonableness. Second, the method of calculating financial loss of stated used due to the price reasonableness was the price reasonableness method.
Kedudukan PT. Angkasa Pura I Dalam Pembayaran Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan
Ridwan HR;
Nurmalita Ayuningtyas Harahap;
Siti Ruhama Mardhatillah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art8
This paper examines the issues of, first, the special assignment of the Minister of BUMN (State Owned Enterprise) and the Minister of Transportation to PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) in land procurement forthe construction of the New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) airport in Kulon Progo Regency, DIY Province whether it can invalidate the obligations of PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) to pay BPHTB. Second, it is regarding the land procurement for the construction of the New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) airport in Kulon Progo Regency, Special District of Yogyakarta whether it can be qualified as "land acquisition for the development of public interest" which is freed from the obligation to payBPHTB. This is a normative legal research using primary and secondary legal materials obtained through literature studies and is analyzed juridical. From the research results, it can be concluded that, first, special assignments could not invalidate the obligations of PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) to payBPHTB. Secondly, PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) in Kulon Progo Regency of Special District of Yogyakarta Province cannot be qualified as "land acquisition for development for public interest" freed from the obligation to pay BPHTB.
Membangun Sistem Integritas Untuk Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia
Masyhudi Masyhudi
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art3
This research aims to analyse and observe: first, the current system of corruption eradication in the Indonesia's positive law perspective; second, the strategy of the Indonesian government to eradicate the corruption in future; and third, the concept of an Integrity System to eradicate the corruption ininvestigations conducted by the Prosecutors, Police and KPK in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical legal research using a legal and conceptual approach. The results of the study showed that first, the system of corruption eradication in Indonesian positive law currently has placed KPK as a leader, causing disharmony among the law enforcers; second, the Indonesian government's strategy to eradicate corruption in the future can be done through an integrity system within the scope of the KPK, the Police and the Prosecutor's Office; third, the concept of the Integrity System for corruption in investigation by the Attorney General's Office, the Police and the Corruption Eradication Commission is carried out by establishing the Integrity Court. This integrity system must be able to position the three institutions as the independent Anti-Corruption Bodies.
Implementasi PERMA No. 2 Tahun 2015 di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta
Bambang Sutiyoso;
Ayu Atika Dewi;
Fuadi Isnawan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art9
o overcome the barriers in the dispute settlement in court, the Supreme Court issued a new mechanism for the settlement of civil cases, called as simple civil claims. The procedure mechanism was introduced through the issuance of PERMA No. 2 of 2015 concerning Simple Civil Claim. The researcher in this study intended to observe the implementation of the PERMA of Simple Civil Claim in Yogyakarta DistrictCourt, along with the obstacles. The study was conducted using the empirical juridical research methodand analytical descriptive data analysis. From the research results, it can be concluded that the implementation of PERMA No. 2 of 2015 concerning Simple Civil Claim in Yogyakarta District Court is still ineffective in practice. This has been determined by various factors such as the rule of law, legal officers, facilities and infrastructure and community. The researcher also found a number of obstaclesfaced in implementing PERMA, some of which were related to the existence of options to choose the procedure mechanism, tight case qualifications that could be submitted through simple program procedures and lack of PERMA socialization.
Konsep Meminta Maaf Sebagai Hukuman Dalam Perkara Pidana
Yusi Amdani;
Liza Agnesta Krisna
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art4
Criminalization is an act against a criminal, but many criminal cases are completed as a result of theimplementation of peace by apologizing. This research focuses on the following problems: first, how the reconceptualization of apologizing as the part of the punishment is reviewed in accordance with the positive law and Islamic law, and second, how the realization of the concept of apoligizing as a punishment in a criminal case is. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that, first, the concept of apologizing is known in criminal law and Islamic law. Regarding the virtue of Islamic law, the concept of apologizing is able to eliminate the criminal acts; thus, the value of the apologizing concept in Islamic law can be applied in criminal law. In national criminal law, the concept of apologizing is implicitly accommodated in the peace process, which in certain criminal acts, especially in the category of minor criminal offenses, is permitted to make peace. Second, some cases that can be given peace are also determined for certain cases such as accidents in traffic, crimes committed by underage child, and other acts constituting the minor crimes by the category of complaint offenses.
Efektivitas Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Melalui Lembaga Adat (Sarak Opat)
Achmad Surya;
Suhartini Suhartini
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art5
Thisstudy aims firstly to observe the effectiveness of minor criminal acts settlement through Sarak Opat in Central Aceh District. Second, it is to find out what constraints being faced by Sarak Opat are in settling the minor criminal acts in Central Aceh District. The method used in this study was empirical legal research or sociological legal research. The types and sources of data used in this study included library research and field research. The data analysis technique was conducted through a descriptivequalitative method by analysing the data obtained from the primary and secondary data sources. This was then continued with a thorough discussion and a conclusion, based on the discussion, was drawn in response to the problems studied. The results of the research showed first that it was still ineffective now that the people becoming the victims of criminal acts more believed in the police as the law enforcement officials rather than the settlement through the traditional institution of Sarak Opat. Second,the constraints faced by Sarak Opat in the settlement of minor crimes in Central Aceh Regency, included 1). The lack of understanding of the traditional institution of Sarak Opat; 2). Customary sanctions not giving any deterrent effects on the perpetrator; 3). No documented dispute settlement by traditional institution Sarak Opat; 4). Lack of coordination between traditional institution Sarak Opat and Police Department.
Menyinergikan Aturan Prudensial Dan Aturan Kepatuhan Syariah Pada Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia
Agus Triyanta
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art6
Besidesbeing generally bound by prudential principles in banking regulations, Islamic banking in Indonesia is also bound by sharia principles. In reality, there are several contradictions between these two jurisdictions (conventional banking and Islamic banking). This article aims to discuss why the contradictions between these two jurisdictions can occur. Furthermore, how the possibilities are to make harmony or adjustment among the various different elements, so that these two different jurisdictions can synergistically play a role in driving the development of Islamic banking in Indonesia. The research method in this article is normative legal research with a qualitative analysis model. The conclusion of this article showed that the set of regulations related to the prudential principle of banking in two banking models (conventional and sharia) in fact were the same. It was because this regulation related to banking prudential was originally designed for conventional banking, and, when applied to Islamic banking, various adjustments were needed, for example in the collateral case. This article recommends that sharia-based prudential principles should be immediately integrated into the regulation of banking prudential principles in general to prevent any problems arose from the application of Islamic banking.
Tinjauan Kasus Tentang Dilusi Merek Di Indonesia Dan Thailand
Rika Ratna Permata;
tasya safiranita safiranita;
Biondy Utama
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art1
Theuse of well-known brands without any license, in practice, often intentionally or unintentionally occurs that not only leads violations but also confusion for the public. The use of a brand without any license -but not creating any public confusion -is referred to as brand dilution. This article aims to examine the brand dilution case occurred in Indonesia and Thailand by concerning with two issues: first, to study the case of IKEA vs. IKEMA occurred in Indonesia and the case of STARBUCKS vs. STARBUNG inThailand including in the brand dilution. Second, to study the protection of well-known brands from brand dilution in Indonesia and Thailand. The research used was normative juridical method by means of the statute approach, case approach, analytical approach and comparative approach. The results of this study indicated that first the case of IKEA vs. IKEMA occurred in Indonesia and the case of STARBUCKS vs. STARBUNG is categorized as the brand dilution in consideration to the brand use that has a similarity to well-known brands. Though it has a different class of goods and/or services, it can eliminate the uniqueness of the famous brand. Second, both Indonesia and Thailand have not specifically regulated the brand dilution. Indonesia is only based on the overall protection on equality and/or equality in principle, while Thailand is only based protection on confusion.
Perkawinan Bawah Umur dan Potensi Perceraian (Studi Kewenangan KUA Wilayah Kota Bogor)
Ani Yumarni;
Endeh Suhartini
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art10
This study examines: first the authority of VAT on Religion Affair Office (KUA) in Sub district of Bogor City Region in creating an orderly administration of registering the underage marriages, and secondly the assessment of the relevance of underage marriage with the high divorce rates in Bogor City Region.This is an empirical juridical research. From the results of this research, it can be concluded that, first, the VAT Institution in Bogor City has made some maximum efforts to create the orderly marital administration as mandated by law. It is also reaffirmed by the Circular of the Ministry of Religion of RI regarding the implementation of the Marriage Administration System (SIMKAH), which increasingly narrows the space for people to do an underage marriage. Second, the prevalence of underage marriage has the relevance to the high divorce rate also dominated by couples aged 21-30 years. It is because even if the marriage is 'not registered', due to being underage according to the law, it still has an opportunity to obtain legality through legal action to submit a marriage permit application in the Religious Court. In addition, emotional immaturity and household unpreparedness are the factors of high divorce among young couples undergoing an underage marriage.
Tumpang-Tindih Pengaturan Bentuk Tiga Dimensi Dalam Undang-Undang Merek Dan Undang-Undang Desain Industri
Natalia Arinasari Nadeak;
Indirani Wauran
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art2
This research includes first, to study juridical understanding related to the concept of "three-dimensional form" found in industrial brand and design; second, to analyze whether the three-dimensional form in the industrial brand and design overlapped; and third, to provide prescription for the three-dimensional overlapping arrangement. This research is a normative legal research using a legislative approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. From the results of this research, it can be concluded that the first, three-dimensional form is potential to get protection in two different IPR regimes, namely brand and industrial design. Second, these conditions then lead to overlapping arrangements in the brand regime and industrial design regime. Although both brand and industrial design protect the three-dimensional form, the object of protection is different. This is due to the basis of the protection of each regime (the brand emphasizes differentiation, while industrial design emphasizes the new aesthetic impression). Third, the condition is given a suggestion to provide a boundary between the three-dimensional brand and industrial design, as seen from several aspects: general forms, forms that should not be listed, public perception, distinctiveness due to use and expansion of the rejection space for the signs to be made as a brand.