cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2 No 1 (2013)" : 13 Documents clear
PEMBERLAKUAN ASAS RETROAKTIF DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI I MADE ADI SERAYA
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 2 No 1 (2013)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (149.442 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2013.v02.i01.p01

Abstract

The study entitled, "The implementation of the retroactive principle in fighting against corruption". The background of this research was derive from the fact that corruption is an extraordinary crime that needs an extra way against it. The formation of Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as an independent agency in the form of eradicating corruption in Indonesia has gradually demonstrated its role. But, Problems then occur when the citizen force KPK to handle the corruption cases before this constitution constructed, especially BLBI case which made this state inflict a financial loss about  Rp 138,4 trillions happen during  the 1997-1998. From the background it raised an issue, whether the retroactive principle can be applied by the Commission in the investigation, and prosecution of the perpetrators of corruption that occurred before the enactment of Law No. 30 Year 2002 was made on the Corruption Eradication Commission? In this discussion the retroactive principle can be applied by the Commission in making "a series of actions" which make it able to conduct an investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators of corruption despite they occurred before Law. 30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission enacted. Besides confirming that the application of this principle is that corruption is a crime classified as an extraordinary crime which has wide negative effects to the country.
PENGATURAN MENGENAI HARGA SAHAM WAJAR SEBAGAI BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMEGANG SAHAM PUBLIK DALAM MERGER BANK YANG BERBENTUK PERSEROAN TERBUKA Pande Yogantara S.
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 2 No 1 (2013)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (58.052 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2013.v02.i01.p06

Abstract

Banking crisis that occurred in 1997 and the issuance of Bank Indonesia regulations Number 8/16/PBI/2006 Regarding Single Presence on Indonesian Banking, led to a merger in the banking industry. Merger action is a legal act, not only causes economic and financial consequences but also the juridical consequences. The consequences of the merger to be seen is the impact on the public shareholders especially in the of bank in form public company.In the event of a merger, position of public shareholders is very weak in regard to corporate decision-making (the company). If the views of the ownership of shares, public shareholders are almost always going to lose when dealing with shareholders, because for every share issued has one vote. The results of this research showedCapital Markets Law and BAPEPAM regulation Number IX.G.1 About Merger or Consolidation Enterprises Public Company or the Issuerdoes not regulate further the understanding and clear criteria of "reasonable stock price". But in bank merger the form of public company,necessary services as a professional independent appraisal supporting the capital markets as mentioned in Article 64 and Article 67 of Act Number 8 Year 1995 About Capital Market,which in turn can make a reasonable assessment of the stock price that reflects fairness for public or minority shareholders.
PENGAWASAN TERHADAP PRAMUWISATA DI PROVINSI BALI I Ketut Suparta
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 2 No 1 (2013)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (471.536 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2013.v02.i01.p11

Abstract

This research is based on a gap that happened in arranging tour guides in Bali in which there are norms conflict between the regional regulation of Bali Province Number 5 Year 2008 on Tour Guide and the Regulation of Cultural and Tourism Minister Number: PM.92/HK.501/MKP/2010 on The Registration Procedure of Tour Guides Business which causes the Government of Bali Province doubtful in doing the authority of controling. In this research is discussed two problem namely the authority of Bali Province Government in arranging the tour guides business and controlling the tour guides. From the research which is conduct with statute approach and the law concept analysis approach that is analyzed by systematization, evaluation, argumentation and description method, it is known that the Bali Province Government has attribution authority  which is strict for arranging the tour guides business and this matter implies on the authority to conduct control that includes law and administration, technical ability and tour guides behavior. Since regional regulation made by the autonomous government structure with autonomous autorithy then the regulation that arranges specified authority for that region remains valid.    

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2013 2013


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue