cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ni Luh Gde Sumardani
Contact Email
-
Phone
+6281338996609
Journal Mail Official
fapetmip@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Gd. Agrokompleks Lt.1 Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Udayana. Jl. PB. Sudirman Denpasar, Bali
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 08538999     EISSN : 26568373     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24843/MIP
Core Subject : Science, Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology
Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan (MIP) diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Udayana. MIP terbit secara berkala, tiga kali dalam setahun, pada bulan Februari, Juni dan Oktober. MIP merangkum berbagai manuskrip di bidang peternakan seperti nutrisi, produksi, reproduksi, pasca panen (pengolahan dan tekhnologi) serta sosial ekonomi bidang peternakan. Manuskrip terbuka untuk para dosen dan peneliti yang berkaitan dengan bidang peternakan, serta terbuka untuk mahasiswa S1, S2, dan S3, dengan mengikuti kaidah yang telah ditetapkan oleh MIP.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pertanian dan Biologi (Semua) - Ilmu Pertanian dan Biologi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 2 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 7 No 2 (2004)" : 2 Documents clear
PENGARUH BAHAN ATAP KANDANG DAN STRAIN TERHADAP PENAMPILAN AYAM PEDAGING ASTININGSIH, N. K.
Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan Vol 7 No 2 (2004)
Publisher : Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (90.634 KB)

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to study the effect of roof materials and strain on broiler performance, located at Dajan Peken Village, Tabanan region of Bali, about 50 m above sea level. A completely Design (CRD) with factorial arrangement 2 x 2 and three replicates was used. Each replicate constained or four birds. The primary factor were coconut leaf roof (K1) and galvanised iron roof (K2), while the secondary factor were strain of CP.707 (Sl) and MF.202 (S2) respectively. Feed in mash form was offered ad libitum. Result of this experiment showed that there were no significant interaction between roof and strain on broiler performance (P>0,05). There were significantly higher body weight gains in K1 as compared to K2 (P<0,05), but there were no significant differences of strain (P>0,05) and feed and water consumption (P>0,05). It is concluded that broilers housed under coconut leaf roof had a better performance compared to birds housed under galvanized iron.
NITROGEN CONTENT AND DRY-MATTER DIGESTIBILITY OF GUINEA AND SABI GRASSES AS INFLUENCED BY TREE LEGUME CANOPY Amar, Andi Lagaligo
Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan Vol 7 No 2 (2004)
Publisher : Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (53.809 KB)

Abstract

A research study was undertaken to study the grass layer across a mini landscape dominated by tree legume Albizia lebbeck to explore the nutritional differences of two introduced grasses, guinea grass (Panicum maximum) and sabi grass (Urochloa mosambicensis), paying particular attention to the presence or absence of tree legume canopy of Albizia lebbeck. The two grass species showed a tendency to replace the native spear grass (Heteropogon contortus); their dominance was more or less complete under tree canopies but was increasing in open areas between trees. Nutritional differences were examined by nitrogen concentration and dry matter digestibility. For comparison, Heteropogon contortus, a native species only found in the open, was included in the nutritional determination using the same methods as the guinea and sabi grasses. The quality parameters of the pasture species were statistically compared (LSD, P=0.05). The quality of herbage was different between the species. Urochloa mosambicensis was better than Panicum maximum. In the open, sabi grass has higher N content (0.62%) than guinea grass (0.55%), but they were similar when grown under the canopy (0.69% and 0.72%, respectively). Sabi grass has consistently higher dry matter digestibility (41.39% and 36.83%, respectively under the canopy and in the open), than guinea grass (27.78% and 24.77%). These two species are much higher in both N concentration and dry matter digestibility than the native spear grass. The native species has contained 0.28% N, and 17.65% digestible dry matter. The feeding values of herbage were influenced by the canopy factor. Both guinea and sabi grasses have better quality when grown under the tree canopies than in between canopies. Nitrogen concentration and dry matter digestibility of the guinea grass under canopy were, 0.72% and 27.78%, respectively, significantly higher than those from the open area, 0.55% and 24.77%. Similarly, herbage of sabi grass under canopy has 0.69% and 41.39%, nitrogen content and digestible dry matter, respectively, which is significantly higher than herbage from the open sites, 0.62% and 36.83%.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2

 1 

Filter by Year

2004 2004


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 27 No 1 (2024): Vol. 27 No. 1 (2024) Vol 26 No 3 (2023): Vol. 26 No. 3 (2023) Vol 26 No 2 (2023): Vol. 26 No. 2 (2023) Vol 26 No 1 (2023): Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023) Vol 25 No 3 (2022): Vol. 25 No. 3 (2022) Vol 25 No 2 (2022): Vol. 25 No. 2 (2022) Vol 25 No 1 (2022): Vol 25, No 1 (2022) Vol 24 No 3 (2021): Vol. 24 No. 3 (2021) Vol 24 No 2 (2021): Vol. 24 No. 2 (2021) Vol 24 No 1 (2021): Vol. 24 No. 1 (2021) Vol 23 No 3 (2020): Vol. 23 No. 3 (2020) Vol 23 No 2 (2020): Vol. 23 No. 2 (2020) Vol 23 No 1 (2020): Vol. 23 No. 1 (2020) Vol 22 No 3 (2019): Vol. 22 No.3 (2019) Vol 22 No 2 (2019): Vol. 22 No.2 (2019) Vol 22 No 1 (2019): Vol. 22 No.1 (2019) Vol 21 No 3 (2018): Vol 21, No 3 (2018) Vol 21 No 2 (2018): Vol 21, No 2 (2018) Vol 21 No 1 (2018): Vol 21, No 1 (2018) Vol 20 No 1 (2017): Vol 20, N0 1 (2017) Vol 20 No 3 (2017): Vol 20, No 3 (2017) Vol 20 No 2 (2017): Vol 20, No 2 (2017) Vol 19 No 3 (2016): Vol 19, No 3 (2016) Vol 19 No 2 (2016): Vol 19, No 2 (2016) Vol 19 No 1 (2016): Vol 19, No 1 (2016) Vol 18 No 3 (2015): Vol 18, No 3 (2015) Vol 18 No 2 (2015): Vol 18, No 2 (2015) Vol 18 No 1 (2015): Vol 18, No 1 (2015) Vol 17 No 3 (2014): Vol 17, No 3 (2014) Vol 17 No 2 (2014): Vol 17, No 2 (2014) Vol 17 No 1 (2014): Vol 17, No 1 (2014) Vol 16, No 1 (2013) Vol 15, No 1 (2012) Vol 14, No 1 (2011) Vol 13, No 3 (2010) Vol 13 No 1 (2010) Vol 12 No 3 (2009) Vol 11 No 1 (2008) Vol 10 No 3 (2007) Vol 10 No 2 (2007) Vol 10 No 1 (2007) Vol 9 No 3 (2006) Vol 9 No 2 (2006) Vol 9 No 1 (2006) Vol 8 No 3 (2005) Vol 8 No 2 (2005) Vol 8 No 1 (2005) Vol 7 No 2 (2004) More Issue