cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Saka Winias
Contact Email
saka.winias@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
dental_journal@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)
Published by Universitas Airlangga
ISSN : 19783728     EISSN : 24429740     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
Dentistry
The Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) (e-ISSN:2442-9740; p-ISSN:1978-3728) is published by the Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga. Its diciplinary focus is dental science and dental hygiene. The Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) is published in English on a quarterly basis with each 50-60 page edition containing between nine and eleven scientific articles on research, study literature and case studies. Contributors to the Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) included: dental researchers, dental practitioners, lecturers, and students drawn from Indonesia and a wide range of other countries.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 38 No. 2 (2005): June 2005" : 12 Documents clear
Respons inflamasi pada pulpa gigi tikus setelah aplikasi ekstrak etanol propolis (EEP) (The inflammatory response on rat dental pulp following ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) application) Ardo Sabir
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) Vol. 38 No. 2 (2005): June 2005
Publisher : Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (978.438 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v38.i2.p77-83

Abstract

Propolis is a resinous hive product collected by bees from tree buds and mixed with secreted bee wax in order to avoid bacterial contamination in the hive, and also to seal it. Propolis is employed for the treatment of various infectious diseases because it is wellknown that is has antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. The therapeutic use of propolis in dentistry has been done in recent years as in treatment gingivitis and dental caries, in treatment wound healing after surgical procedures, etc. The purpose of this investigation was to study the inflammatory response on rat's dental pulp following application of ethanol extract of propolis (EEP). Twelve male Spraque-Dawley rats of 8–16 week old and 200–250 grams in weight were used in this study. The rats were randomly divided into two groups. Pulp exposures were performed on the occlusal surface of right maxillary first molars. At the first group, as the control group, zinc oxide-based filler was directly applied on pulp exposure. Meanwhile at the second group, as the sample group, pulp exposure was applied with EEP. After that, all cavities were filled with glass ionomer cement as permanent filling. Animals were sacrificed on the 7th, 14th, and 28th day. The criterion of histological examination was based on the inflammatory responses of the dental pulp, which were the presence of polymorph nuclear leukocytes and macrophages. Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were employed to analyze the data. The results of this research demonstrated that the inflammatory response of EEP group was numerically milder compared to the control group, even though statistical analysis showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups.
Sitotoksisitas resin akrilik hybrid setelah penambahan glass fiber dengan metode berbeda (Cytotoxicity of the hybrid acrylic resin after glass fiber reinforcement with difference method) Intan Nirwana; R. Helal Soekartono
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) Vol. 38 No. 2 (2005): June 2005
Publisher : Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (110.29 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v38.i2.p56-59

Abstract

Glass fiber reinforcement of the hybrid acrylic resin with difference method can enhance residual monomer content of the material; it can cause cytotoxic effect on fibroblast cells. The purpose of this study was to know the cytotoxicity of hybrid acrylic resins after glass fiber reinforcement with difference method on the cultured fibroblasts. The squared specimens of 10 mm in length, 10 mm in width and 1.5 mm in thickness were cured for 20 minutes at 100° C. The fibroblast cells were grown in Eagle's Minimum Essential Medium to be 2 × 105 cells/ml, then the cells were added to the samples in the plates and incubated at 37° C. After 48 hours, the cytotoxic effect was determined by direct cell number count using microscope and a hemocytometer. The statistical analyses using one way ANOVA and LSD test showed that there were significant difference in cell viability (p < 0.05) among the groups. The means percentage of cell viability were 90.00%, 99.,11%, 98.66%, it could be concluded that glass fiber reinforcement into hybrid acrylic resin with either first method or second method was not toxic.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2005 2005


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 59 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 58 No. 4 (2025): December Vol. 58 No. 3 (2025): September Vol. 58 No. 2 (2025): June Vol. 58 No. 1 (2025): March Vol. 57 No. 4 (2024): December Vol. 57 No. 3 (2024): September Vol. 57 No. 2 (2024): June Vol. 57 No. 1 (2024): March Vol. 56 No. 2 (2023): June 2023 Vol. 56 No. 1 (2023): March 2023 Vol. 56 No. 4 (2023): December Vol. 56 No. 3 (2023): September Vol. 55 No. 4 (2022): December 2022 Vol. 55 No. 3 (2022): September 2022 Vol. 55 No. 2 (2022): June 2022 Vol. 55 No. 1 (2022): March 2022 Vol. 54 No. 4 (2021): December 2021 Vol. 54 No. 3 (2021): September 2021 Vol. 54 No. 2 (2021): June 2021 Vol. 54 No. 1 (2021): March 2021 Vol. 53 No. 4 (2020): December 2020 Vol. 53 No. 3 (2020): September 2020 Vol. 53 No. 2 (2020): June 2020 Vol. 53 No. 1 (2020): March 2020 Vol. 52 No. 4 (2019): December 2019 Vol. 52 No. 3 (2019): September 2019 Vol. 52 No. 2 (2019): June 2019 Vol. 52 No. 1 (2019): March 2019 Vol. 51 No. 4 (2018): December 2018 Vol. 51 No. 3 (2018): September 2018 Vol. 51 No. 2 (2018): June 2018 Vol. 51 No. 1 (2018): March 2018 Vol. 50 No. 4 (2017): December 2017 Vol. 50 No. 3 (2017): September 2017 Vol. 50 No. 2 (2017): June 2017 Vol. 50 No. 1 (2017): March 2017 Vol. 49 No. 4 (2016): December 2016 Vol. 49 No. 3 (2016): September 2016 Vol. 49 No. 2 (2016): June 2016 Vol. 49 No. 1 (2016): March 2016 Vol. 48 No. 4 (2015): December 2015 Vol. 48 No. 3 (2015): September 2015 Vol. 48 No. 2 (2015): June 2015 Vol. 48 No. 1 (2015): March 2015 Vol. 47 No. 4 (2014): December 2014 Vol. 47 No. 3 (2014): September 2014 Vol. 47 No. 2 (2014): June 2014 Vol. 47 No. 1 (2014): March 2014 Vol. 46 No. 4 (2013): December 2013 Vol. 46 No. 3 (2013): September 2013 Vol. 46 No. 2 (2013): June 2013 Vol. 46 No. 1 (2013): March 2013 Vol. 45 No. 4 (2012): December 2012 Vol. 45 No. 3 (2012): September 2012 Vol. 45 No. 2 (2012): June 2012 Vol. 45 No. 1 (2012): March 2012 Vol. 44 No. 4 (2011): December 2011 Vol. 44 No. 3 (2011): September 2011 Vol. 44 No. 2 (2011): June 2011 Vol. 44 No. 1 (2011): March 2011 Vol. 43 No. 4 (2010): December 2010 Vol. 43 No. 3 (2010): September 2010 Vol. 43 No. 2 (2010): June 2010 Vol. 43 No. 1 (2010): March 2010 Vol. 42 No. 4 (2009): December 2009 Vol. 42 No. 3 (2009): September 2009 Vol. 42 No. 2 (2009): June 2009 Vol. 42 No. 1 (2009): March 2009 Vol. 41 No. 4 (2008): December 2008 Vol. 41 No. 3 (2008): September 2008 Vol. 41 No. 2 (2008): June 2008 Vol. 41 No. 1 (2008): March 2008 Vol. 40 No. 4 (2007): December 2007 Vol. 40 No. 3 (2007): September 2007 Vol. 40 No. 2 (2007): June 2007 Vol. 40 No. 1 (2007): March 2007 Vol. 39 No. 4 (2006): December 2006 Vol. 39 No. 3 (2006): September 2006 Vol. 39 No. 2 (2006): June 2006 Vol. 39 No. 1 (2006): March 2006 Vol. 38 No. 4 (2005): December 2005 Vol. 38 No. 3 (2005): September 2005 Vol. 38 No. 2 (2005): June 2005 Vol. 38 No. 1 (2005): March 2005 More Issue