cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia
Contact Email
mkgi@ugm.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
mkgi@ugm.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. bantul,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Journal of Governance and Public Policy
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
ISSN : 24600164     EISSN : 25497669     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
The journal aims to publish research articles within the field of Public Policy and Governance, and to analys a range of contemporary political and governing processes.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 3: October 2014" : 14 Documents clear
Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Tahunan Di Kecamatan Sanana Kabupaten Kepulauan Sula Hariyanto Usia; Ulung Pribadi
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol 1, No 3: October 2014
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgpp.v1i3.2113

Abstract

Public participation inside government become universal disclosure that appear concurrent with present him governanceconcept in arrangement government. After become mainstreaming issue governance concept (tata-kelola government)produce various definition. Concept governance refer in institution, process and tradition that determine,how kekuasaaan held, decision made, and voice denizen in hear. Kabupaten local government Sula Isles especiallyKecamatan Sanana to realize government that participative feel shortcoming. Cultivation and government informationgiving to community valued still very minim. To the present time, development planning that participative to needcommunity only claimed unilaterally by government Sula Regency especially Sanana subdistrict has been conductedfor well, and accordance procedure that apply. This research use two approaches outright namely qualitative andquantitative approach. Location research in Sanana subdistrict Sula regency. Data collection conducted with threeway, namely: interview, documentation and questionnaire. Data analysis unit in this research is government SulaRegency, citizen and stakeholder that engage in musrenbang Kecamatan Sanana 2011-2012. Sample withdrawaltechnique in this research is withdrawal sample non random (non probability sampling) namely Purposive Sampling.This result research show community participation level in Musrenbang Sanana subdistrict. In 2011 and 2012 includedin informing category level (level participation where community heard and allowed contend, but they do nothave ability to get guarantee that their view would be considered by holder decision.) That thing in pengaruhi olekfactor internal: age, sex, level of education and work eye points of view. While factor external: government andstakeholder own experience that is more compared by community.
Kualitas Layanan Kantor Imigrasi Kelas 1 Yogyakarta dalam Pembuatan Paspor Berbasis E-Government Iswahyudi Iswahyudi; Ulung Pribadi
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol 1, No 3: October 2014
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgpp.v1i3.2114

Abstract

The porpuse of the research is to determine the quality of servicein the government apparatus based electronicpassport, in this study using 5 indicators that Keberwujudan (tangible), Daya Tanggap (Responsiviness), Kehandalan(Realibility), Jaminan (Assurance), and Empathy (Empathy). andalsosee at the factors that influence the quality ofservice indicators Organizations, Human Resource, and Service System. The methoduse disdescriptive quantitativemethod using frequency distribution, and the data collection were interviews, observation, documentationandquestionnaires. With research sites at the Immigration Office Class 1 Yogyakarta. Results ofthe research is thatthequality of service in thegovernment apparatus based electronic passport given tothe publicis VeryGood”as indicatedby the scale 4.21cumulative indexofthe highest value 5.The variables that have the highest value is in thevariable Assurance (Warranty) with a score value of 4.60 with the category of “Very Good” and the variable that getsthe lowest score by the public is the variable empathy with a score value of 3.97although the category of “Good”. Asfor the factor of influence in the organization’s services are among the factors, for cesor human resources andservice system. Then there commendations givent o the immigration office in Yogyakarta is in grade 1 to furtherenhancethe quality of His ministry, especially in the Empathy dimension of hospitality, courtesy and discriminatoryactions in serving.
Tata Kelola Kebijakan Qanun Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Maisir (Perjudian) Di Kabupaten Gayo Lues Provinsi Aceh Muhammad Fikar; Dyah Mutiarin
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol 1, No 3: October 2014
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgpp.v1i3.2109

Abstract

The concept of regional autonomy and the views from the historical Aceh considered appropriate to enforce ShariaLaw kaffah. Qanun No.13 of 2003 about Maisir (Gambling) is one of the five existing Qanun in the implementationIslamic Sharia in Aceh, with the aim of preventing all forms of implementation and support for implementing gambling,to implement Islamic Sharia there are three institutions that run(1) Department of Islamic Sharia, (2) Satpol PP andWH, (3) Syariah Court. Bu tthe reality is still going on various forms of gambling. The above considerations, there viewwas conducted in order to see how the Governance Policy Qanun No.13 of 2003 about Maisir (Gambling) in Gayo LuesRegencyof Aceh province and Relationships between Implementing Agencies. The method used in answering thereview using qualitative descriptive method to obtain aclear description of the public participation, LSM in the implementationof Qanun No.13 of 2003 and the relationship between the executing agency. Therefore, the technique incollecting the data that used is observation technique which is observe the objects condition in the field, interview theperformers who involved in implementing Qanun Nomor 13 in 2013 about Maisir (gambling) in regency of GayoLueswith record it in a document.
Konflik Agraria Di Kabupaten Pulau Morotai (Studi Peran Pemerintah Daerah Pada Konflik Pertanahan di Masyarakat) Indra Lesang; Zuly Qodir
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol 1, No 3: October 2014
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgpp.v1i3.2111

Abstract

Matter agrarian (matter land) is matter live and livelihood human, due to land is origin and source food. Land causeproblem and conflict. Land conflict case in Pulau Morotai regency is conflict land between five villagers with TNI-AU.This research use descriptive qualitative approach. Data source obtained from study literature, documentation, andinterview with some information sources. First result research, this conflict land matters have roots in from history.This land matters conflict development originating from from difference perception of mastery land. Less firm attitudeLocal Government also is one of this source conflict. The conflict by economy impact to community five village particularlyin development. All invenstor also afraid instill the capital, this was because because happened resistance bysociety five village. Second, less intense it Pemerintah Daerah Melakukan Konsiliasi, mediation. Conciliation and Mediasionly happened when action protest getting intense. Happened by house foundation demolition and community propertyhouse five village no intervene by government to block. Third, policies issued by government of Pulau Morotairegency in conflict land matters between community five Desa with TNI-AU not touched in society. Policies made toomuch bias elite.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2014 2014


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025): October 2025 Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): June 2025 Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): February 2025 Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024): October 2024 Vol 11, No 2 (2024): June 2024 Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): June 2024 Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): February 2024 Vol 11, No 1 (2024): February 2024 Vol. 10 No. 3 (2023): October 2023 Vol 10, No 3 (2023): October 2023 Vol 10, No 2 (2023): June 2023 Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023): June 2023 Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023): February 2023 Vol 10, No 1 (2023): February 2023 Vol. 9 No. 3 (2022): October 2022 Vol 9, No 3 (2022): October 2022 Vol 9, No 2 (2022): June 2022 Vol 9, No 1 (2022): February 2022 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022): February 2022 Vol 8, No 3 (2021): October 2021 Vol 8, No 2 (2021): June 2021 Vol 8, No 1 (2021): February 2021 Vol 7, No 3 (2020): October 2020 Vol 7, No 2 (2020): June 2020 Vol 7, No 1 (2020): February 2020 Vol 6, No 3 (2019): October 2019 Vol 6, No 2 (2019): June 2019 Vol 6, No 1 (2019): February 2019 Vol 6, No 1 (2019): February 2019 Vol 5, No 3 (2018): October 2018 Vol 5, No 3 (2018): October 2018 Vol 5, No 2 (2018): June 2018 Vol 5, No 2 (2018): June 2018 Vol 5, No 1 (2018): February 2018 Vol 5, No 1 (2018): February 2018 Vol 5, No 1 (2018): February 2017 Vol 4, No 3 (2017): October 2017 Vol 4, No 3 (2017): October 2017 Vol 4, No 2 (2017): June 2017 Vol 4, No 2 (2017): June 2017 Vol 4, No 1: February 2017 Vol 4, No 1: February 2017 Vol 3, No 3: October 2016 Vol 3, No 3: October 2016 Vol 3, No 2: June 2016 Vol 3, No 2: June 2016 Vol 3, No 1: February 2016 Vol 3, No 1: February 2016 Vol 2, No 3: October 2015 Vol 2, No 3: October 2015 Vol 2, No 2: June 2015 Vol 2, No 2: June 2015 Vol 2, No 1: February 2015 Vol 2, No 1: February 2015 Vol 1, No 3: October 2014 Vol 1, No 3: October 2014 Vol 1, No 2: June 2014 Vol 1, No 2: June 2014 Vol 1, No 1: February 2014 Vol 1, No 1: February 2014 More Issue