cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. ogan ilir,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Sriwijaya Law Review
Published by Universitas Sriwijaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science, Social,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The Sriwijaya Law Review known as the SLRev launched on the 31st January 2017 and inaugurated formally by the Rector of the university is a forum which aims to provide a high-quality research and writing related to law. Areas that relevant to the scope of the journal cover: business law, criminal law, constitutional law, administrative law, and international law
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024" : 12 Documents clear
Legal Consequences of Disobedience of Provisional Decision of the Administrative Court Sri Winarsi
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.3201.pp152-170

Abstract

The existence of a legal vacuum in the State Administrative Court (PTUN) procedural law relating to the execution of the PTUN Provisional Decision raises the issue of Judicial Disobedience by state administrative institutions that do not want to carry out the PTUN Provisional Decision. Departing from this, there are two main problem formulations, namely: (1) What are the characteristics of PTUN provisional decisions? and (2) What is the formulation of legal protection against non-compliance with PTUN provisional decisions? Furthermore, this legal research uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Based on an examination of existing legal issues, it can be concluded that provisional decisions are known in PTUN procedural law practice, where provisional decisions are submitted for matters deemed essential (urgent circumstances) by the Plaintiff to the Panel of Judges to be decided in an Interim Decision. Suppose the Party ordered by the PTUN does not implement the PTUN provisional decision. In that case, 2 (two) legal preventive mechanisms and 3 (three) legal repressive remedies can be taken in stages: 1) Sending a letter to the relevant agency, 2) Reporting to the Ombudsman, and 3) Using Criminal Law Mechanisms.
Judaization in Palestine: Is It Genocide According to the 1998 Rome Statute? hafara khoirunisa; sefriani sefriani; jawahir thontowi; jaya indra santosa; yashifa febriani; Ahmed Zeiad Masoud
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.3144.pp79-98

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the act of genocide in the attempt at Judaization in Palestine based on the 1998 Rome Statute and examine the possibility of categorizing the Judaization of Palestine as cultural genocide because Judaization has changed various aspects of Palestinian life and the Palestinian territories themselves. In addition, cultural genocide has been eliminated from its history, but there are still actions that are assumed to lead to it. This research is a type of normative legal research using a conceptual, statutory, case, and historical approach. The results of this study indicate that the Judaization of land and people in Palestine is a crime of genocide, as stated in Article 6 (c) of the 1998 Rome Statute. At the same time, the Judaization of identity and holy places can be categorized as cultural genocide, according to experts. However, the opinions of experts contained in legal works are subsidiary legal sources and, until now, have not been recognized as customary international law. In addition, the Judaization of identity and holy places within the framework of international law can only be viewed as genocidal intent, not cultural genocide.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025 Volume 8 Issue 2, July 2024 Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024 Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023 Volume 7, Issue 1 January 2023 Volume 6 Issue 2, July 2022 Volume 6 Issue 1, January 2022 Volume 5 Issue 2, July 2021 Volume 5 Issue 1, January 2021 Volume 4 Issue 2, July 2020 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2020 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, JULY 2019 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2019 VOLUME 2, ISSUE 2, JULY 2018 VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2018 VOLUME 1, ISSUE 2, JULY 2017 VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2017 More Issue