Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dialogia Iuridica
Idul Rishan
Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Justifikasi Pelembagaan Peradilan Etik Idul Rishan
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 9 No. 1 (2017): Volume 9 Nomor 1 November 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28932/di.v9i1.733

Abstract

This study examines the justification of institutionalize the court of ethic. This type of research is normative juridical. The approach used is a historical, statue, and conceptual approach. The results show that urgency of institutionalization court of ethic is justified by three things. First, philosophical justification. Philosophically, as staatsfundamental norm, Pancasila as the source of rule of ethic in nation and state. Second, juridical justification. After the amendment of UUD 1945, the constitution provides assurance of the importance of the rule of ethic in the body of the Constitution. It is based on the imperative phrase of the Constitution which provides a good behavior prerequisite for becoming a state official. Third, sociological justification. The proliferation of ethical supervisory body after the amendment of the Constitution requires institutional consolidation, due to the weak internal adjudication process conducted by each supervisory institution at this time. Therefore, the institutionalization of court of ethic can be an alternative to enforce the function of adjudication of ethical violations in an integrated manner.
Co-Authors