Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law Perspectives Review
Walidul Halim
Universitas Pembangunan nasional Veteran

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tata Kelola Keuangan Negara Di Era Post Pandemi: Kajian Hukum Atas Pengelolaan Dana Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional Ismarini Della purnama; Novaranty Zura Dwiputri; Walidul Halim; Irwan Triadi
Journal of Law Perspectives Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Catalist Indo Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64670/jlpr.v1i2.34

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic compelled the Indonesian government to adopt extraordinary fiscal measures to maintain national economic stability. One of the key instruments was the National Economic Recovery (PEN) Program, which allocated Rp695.2 trillion in 2020 and increased in subsequent years. Although implemented under emergency conditions, the program remained subject to the principles of state financial governance mandated by national laws, particularly Law No. 1 of 2004 on State Treasury. This study examines the extent to which the principles of transparency, accountability, efficiency, and public participation were applied in the management of PEN funds during the post-pandemic period, and identifies legal and institutional challenges that hinder their implementation. Using a normative juridical approach combined with qualitative analysis of legislation, state financial reports, and audit findings from the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK), the research finds that despite adequate regulatory provisions, several gaps persist in practice. These include limited fiscal data integration, weak cross-sector oversight, inconsistent disclosure of budget realization, and insufficient mechanisms for meaningful public engagement. The study also highlights structural constraints within implementing agencies that reduce policy coherence and delay monitoring processes. Strengthening legal instruments, enhancing digital transparency systems, and improving public accountability frameworks are therefore essential to ensure effective and legitimate state financial management when responding to future crises.
Comparison of the Indonesian Military Legal System with the Malaysian Military Legal System Anis Fauzan; Walidul Halim; Irwan Triadi
Journal of Law Perspectives Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Catalist Indo Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64670/jlpr.v2i1.69

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of how differences in legal traditions influence the structure and enforcement of military law in Indonesia and Malaysia. It aims to examine and compare the legal foundations, institutional structures of military courts, and the characteristics of law enforcement applied to members of the armed forces in both countries. The research employs a normative juridical method with a comparative law approach by analyzing statutory regulations, particularly Law Number 31 of 1997 on Military Courts in Indonesia and the Armed Forces Act 1972 (Act 77) in Malaysia, as well as relevant legal literature and doctrines. The findings reveal that the principal differences between the two systems derive from their respective legal traditions—Civil Law in Indonesia and Common Law in Malaysia—which shape the organization of military courts, jurisdictional design, and procedural mechanisms for adjudicating military offenses. Indonesia relies on a codified and hierarchical military judicial structure, whereas Malaysia integrates common law principles within its court-martial system. Nevertheless, both systems share a fundamental objective, namely maintaining discipline, hierarchy, and command effectiveness within military institutions. In conclusion, despite structural and procedural distinctions, the military legal systems of Indonesia and Malaysia pursue similar normative goals. This study contributes to the development of comparative military law and offers a reference for strengthening military legal reform in Indonesia in alignment with the principles of the rule of law, military professionalism, and legal supremacy.
Co-Authors Anis Fauzan Irwan Triadi Ismarini Della Purnama Novaranty Zura Dwiputri