Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KERTHA WICAKSANA International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Made Aditya Pramana Putra
Universitas Udayana
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Eksistensi Kode Etik Notaris dalam Pembatasan Promosi Diri di Era Digital Ni Kadek Andhina Putri Artini; Made Aditya Pramana Putra
Kertha Wicaksana Vol 20 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/kw.20.1.2026.10-19

Abstract

This study examines the existence and implementation of the Notary Code of Ethics in regulating self-promotion in the digital era, particularly through social media platforms. The advancement of information technology has transformed how notaries interact with the public, with digital platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and LinkedIn increasingly used to introduce themselves or their notarial services. However, such practices raise ethical concerns as they contradict Article 4 paragraph (3) of the Notary Code of Ethics, which prohibits any form of professional promotion. This research employs a normative legal method with a literature study approach to analyze the applicable legal provisions within the Notary Law (UUJN) and the Notary Code of Ethics (KEN), as well as to identify the boundaries and legal consequences for notaries who engage in online self-promotion. The results show that notaries are only allowed to use social media for educational and legal awareness purposes, not for commercial interests. Violations of this rule may result in ethical sanctions by the Honorary Council of the Indonesian Notary Association and administrative sanctions by the Notary Supervisory Board. Therefore, it is necessary to update the digital ethics guidelines to provide clearer boundaries for notarial behavior in online spaces, ensuring that integrity, professionalism, and public trust in the notarial profession remain intact amid the rapid development of digital technology.
Shifting Paradigms of Sexual Violence Victims within the Integrated Criminal Justice System in Indonesia Josephine Suprapto; Made Aditya Pramana Putra
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education (on progres)
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v7i2.1511

Abstract

This article examines the transformation of victim protection in Indonesia's integrated criminal justice system following the enactment of Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes (UU TPKS). It asks whether the statutory shift toward a victim-centered approach has been translated into adjudicative practice, particularly in relation to restitution and psychological rehabilitation. The study applies normative or doctrinal legal research. It combines statutory, historical, conceptual, and case approaches, with particular attention to Denpasar District Court Decision No. 77/Pid.Sus/2026/PN Dps. Primary legal materials include Law No. 12 of 2022, Law No. 31 of 2014 on Witness and Victim Protection, Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, and Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2017. The analysis is guided by Lawrence M. Friedman's legal system theory and Nonet and Selznick's responsive law theory. The article finds a significant gap between progressive statutory substance and courtroom implementation. Although the UU TPKS recognizes victims' rights to care, protection, recovery, restitution, and rehabilitation, judicial practice remains substantially offender-oriented. In the case studied, the decision successfully imposed criminal punishment but did not integrate restitution or victim recovery into the operative part of the judgment. The problem is not merely doctrinal but systemic: legal substance has advanced faster than legal structure and legal culture. The article contributes to Indonesian criminal justice scholarship by identifying a procedural vacuum in the enforcement of victim recovery rights. It argues for mandatory restitution calculation, judicial authority to address recovery ex officio, and institutional synchronization among investigators, prosecutors, judges, LPSK, social services, and victim assistance providers.
Corporate Legal Liability for Failure to Register Workers in Indonesia's Social Security System: A Good Corporate Governance Perspective I Made Upadana Putra Miasa; Made Aditya Pramana Putra
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education (on progres)
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v7i2.1540

Abstract

This article examines the legal consequences of a corporation's failure to register workers in Indonesia's national social security system and evaluates that non-compliance through the principles of Good Corporate Governance (GCG). It applies doctrinal legal research using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Primary legal materials include the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 40 of 2004 on the National Social Security System, Law No. 24 of 2011 on the Social Security Administering Bodies, Law No. 2 of 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement, the labour-law framework as amended by Law No. 6 of 2023, and Government Regulation No. 86 of 2013. The analysis shows that the duty to register workers is a mandatory statutory obligation rather than a discretionary employee benefit. Failure to register directly attracts administrative sanctions and may also support a rights dispute and civil compensation where loss and causation are established. Criminal liability should not be inferred automatically from non-registration; under the BPJS Law it arises only when the specific statutory elements of contribution-related offences are satisfied. From a governance perspective, non-registration indicates failures of responsibility, accountability, fairness, transparency, board oversight, and internal control. The article develops an integrated liability-governance framework that connects legal sanctions with preventive corporate controls, including workforce reconciliation, contribution audits, board-level compliance reporting, accessible worker grievance procedures, and documented remediation. This framework clarifies the boundary between administrative, civil, industrial-relations, and criminal consequences while positioning social-security compliance as a core corporate-governance obligation.
Co-Authors I Made Upadana Putra Miasa Josephine Suprapto Ni Kadek Andhina Putri Artini