Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Prasada Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam
Aries Isnandar
Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Probative Power of Deepfake-Based Electronic Evidence in Fraud Crimes Wahyu Slamet Permadi; Aries Isnandar; Yogi Prasetyo
Jurnal Hukum Prasada Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Prasada
Publisher : Magister of Law, Post Graduate Program, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jhp.13.1.2026.37-45

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence technology, especially deepfakes, pose serious problems for the system of evidence in criminal law, particularly in the handling of digital-based fraud. Audio and visual manipulation that increasingly resembles authentic conditions has the potential to undermine the authenticity and integrity of electronic evidence, increase the possibility of misrepresentation, and hinder efforts to achieve material truth and legal certainty. This study aims to analyze the legal position and evidentiary value of deepfake-based electronic evidence in criminal fraud cases according to the Indonesian positive law framework, as well as to formulate a model for assessing the reliability of electronic evidence that is responsive to the dynamics of artificial intelligence development. This research uses a normative legal research method through a legislative, conceptual, and comparative approach. Primary and secondary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively through a review of national norms regarding electronic evidence and a comparison of digital evidence practices in a number of other jurisdictions. The findings of the study show that normative recognition of electronic evidence in Indonesian criminal procedure law is already available, while technical regulations related to authentication and evaluation of the reliability of artificial intelligence-based electronic evidence, particularly deepfakes, have not been specifically formulated. The absence of specific technical regulations weakens the material strength of evidence and places the assessment of judges and digital forensic experts as the main determining factors. The urgency of strengthening criminal procedure law is emphasized through the application of the Electronic Evidence Reliability Framework (EERF), which integrates digital forensic verification, metadata validation, and the continuity of the chain of custody of electronic evidence to ensure justice, legal certainty, and the protection of the rights of the parties in the criminal justice process.
The Autonomy Trap: Corruption by Regional Heads Through Grease Payments and Phantom Projects That Impoverish the People Farel Marhajid Sayyidina; Yogi Prasetyo; Aries Isnandar
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 18 No. 2 (2026): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v8i2.13601

Abstract

Regional autonomy in Indonesia ideally accelerates development and public welfare, but in reality, it has created structural gaps that enable increasingly rampant corruption by regional heads. The novelty of this research lies in analyzing the direct relationship between three modes of regional head corruption (bribery, position trading, and fictitious projects) and the impact of structural impoverishment of the people, which has not been extensively studied in an integrated manner. This research employs normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by limited empirical analysis of five arrest operations of regional heads during the 2024-2025 period. The findings reveal that regional heads exploit the discretionary space of autonomy through three main modes: bribery and project kickbacks ranging from 10-30% of project value, trading of strategic positions priced from hundreds of millions to billions of rupiah, and fictitious projects that drain regional budgets without physical realization. These three modes form a systemic corruption cycle resulting in the collapse of basic public services, widespread illegal levies, and the creation of sustainable structural poverty in regions.
Punishment Awaits: Criminal Liability for Producers and Distributors of Adulterated Alcoholic Beverages Fernanda Lucky; Yogi Prasetyo; Aries Isnandar
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 18 No. 2 (2026): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i2.13237

Abstract

Ideally, the criminal justice system should provide maximum protection to society through effective law enforcement against producers and distributors of adulterated alcoholic beverages. In reality, however, the circulation of adulterated liquor continues to persist and recur, frequently resulting in fatalities due to weak regulatory oversight, complexities in criminal proof, and the suboptimal enforcement of criminal sanctions. This study aims to examine the criminal liability of producers and distributors of adulterated alcoholic beverages, the evidentiary framework for prosecuting such offenses, and the optimization of law enforcement as a preventive strategy within the Indonesian positive legal system. This research employs a qualitative library research design using a normative legal approach through the statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The findings reveal that criminal liability may be imposed under the Indonesian Criminal Code, the Health Law, and the Consumer Protection Law, with evidentiary standards emphasizing mens rea, causal relationship, and scientific evidence.
Co-Authors Farel Marhajid Sayyidina Fernanda Lucky Wahyu Slamet Permadi Yogi Prasetyo