Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Al-Karim : Jurnal Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Studi Islam
Erik Afriyuda
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparative Study Between the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Four Schools of Thought on the Concept of Reconciliation Safrudin, Ahmad Hafidz; Erik Afriyuda
Jurnal Al-Karim : Jurnal Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Studi Islam Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Al Karim Edisi September 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LP2M) Institut Agama Islam YAPTIP Chadijah Ismail Pasaman Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In Islam, the concept of rujuk or return after divorce (especially divorce raj'i) is a form of Allah's compassion for His servants, so that divorced couples still have the opportunity to repair the relationship, as long as it is still in the iddah period (waiting period after divorce). Reconciliation can be a means of mutual reflection and evaluation so that previous conflicts are not repeated. Reconciliation is not just a formality, but requires sincere intention from both parties to improve the relationship, awareness of previous mistakes, healthy communication and guidance (for example through family counseling or clerical advice). However in Islam that Islam strongly encourages reconciliation if it brings maslahah (good) to both parties and the family, especially the children, but also makes room if separation is the best course. Scholars agree that reconciliation is allowed in Islam. This rujuk effort is the last alternative to reconnect the physical and mental relationship between husband and wife that was cut off due to divorce (thalak raj'i). Based on the analysis that the author has done, there are differences of opinion among the four madhhabs. Of the four opinions, Imam ash-Shafi'i's opinion is considered the most relevant in the Indonesian context, because the Islamic legal system in Indonesia generally refers to the Shafi'i Mazhab which emphasizes the clarity of speech and the importance of the presence of witnesses in the reconciliation process.
Co-Authors Safrudin, Ahmad Hafidz