Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Relationship between Radiotherapy and Cognitive Impairment in Brain Tumor Patients : A Systematic Review Ahmad Dalma Haidar; Arda Fatkhul Khoiriyah
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 46 No. 1 (2026): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/nazfmm24

Abstract

Introduction: Radiotherapy (RT) is a cornerstone in treating brain tumors but is associated with potential cognitive decline. The relationship between RT and cognitive impairment is complex, influenced by tumor type, RT modality, and patient-specific factors. Methods: This systematic review synthesized data from 80 included studies encompassing a broad range of designs, from randomized controlled trials, etc. We extracted data on patient populations, RT details (whole-brain radiotherapy [WBRT], stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS], proton therapy), cognitive assessment methods, outcomes, dose-response relationships, underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and prevention strategies. Results: WBRT produced the most severe cognitive decline, with 91.7% of patients experiencing deterioration at 3 months compared to 63.5% with SRS alone (P. Brown et al., 2016). SRS-based approaches resulted in substantially less cognitive morbidity. Hippocampal-avoidance (HA)-WBRT significantly reduced cognitive failure (adjusted HR=0.74, p=0.016) (Crockett & Simões, 2023). Mean brain dose inversely predicted cognitive trajectories in IDH-mutant glioma (Jaspers et al., 2024). Key mechanisms include vascular injury, white matter damage, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress. Risk factors include older age, low cognitive reserve, and pre-existing leukoencephalopathy. Discussion: The findings reveal a consistent hierarchy of cognitive toxicity: WBRT > SRS > focal/partial brain RT. A central tension exists between maximizing tumor control (achieved by WBRT) and preserving cognition (achieved by SRS and hippocampal sparing). Distinguishing tumor-related from treatment-related cognitive effects remains a key challenge, as baseline impairment is highly prevalent. Dose-response relationships are structure-specific, implicating the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, thalamus, and white matter tracts. Neuroprotective strategies, including memantine and HA-WBRT, show benefit, while donepezil offers modest improvements. Conclusion: Modern RT protocols should prioritize cognitive preservation through appropriate modality selection (SRS alone for 1-3 metastases), hippocampal avoidance, and minimizing mean brain dose. Future research should focus on integrating cognitive endpoints into clinical trial design and validating dosimetric constraints for distributed brain structures.
Short-lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform Headache Attacks with Conjunctival Injection and Tearing (SUNCT) sebagai Penyebab Nyeri Orbital Hebat pada Pasien Dewasa: Sebuah Laporan Kasus Komprehensif Ahmad Dalma Haidar; Arda Fatkhul Khoiriyah
The Indonesian Journal of General Medicine Vol. 39 No. 1 (2026): The Indonesian Journal of General Medicine
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/42ptkw04

Abstract

Introduction: Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) is an extremely rare trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia (TAC) characterized by highly frequent, ultra-brief, unilateral headache paroxysms accompanied by prominent ipsilateral cranial parasympathetic symptoms.1 Diagnosing SUNCT is clinically challenging due to substantial overlap with trigeminal neuralgia and other TACs, requiring meticulous evaluation and neuroimaging to exclude secondary structural etiologies.1 Case Illustration: A 47-year-old male presented with a 2-week history of excruciating, strictly right-sided orbital and supraorbital pain.4 The stabbing and burning paroxysms lasted 30-90 seconds, recurring 30-40 times daily, with an intensity of 9-10/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).4 Attacks were triggered mechanically by touching the face, washing, or chewing, without any refractory period.4 Ipsilateral conjunctival injection, lakrimation, rhinorrhea, and marked psychomotor agitation consistently accompanied the pain.4 Neurological examination and non-contrast brain CT scan were normal.4 The patient was diagnosed with primary episodic SUNCT.4 A dual oral preventive therapy was immediately initiated with lamotrigine (25 mg/day, titrated up to 100 mg/day) and gabapentin (300 mg three times daily).4 At a 2-week follow-up, the daily attack frequency dramatically dropped to 5-7 times, and pain intensity significantly decreased to NRS 3-4/10, demonstrating excellent tolerability without adverse events.4 Discussion: SUNCT diagnosis relies on the ICHD-3 criteria.8 Pathophysiology involves central disinhibition of the trigemino-autonomic reflex and posterior hypothalamic activation.1 Although lamotrigine is the gold-standard first-line preventive, its mandatory slow titration creates a critical therapeutic gap during acute, high-frequency phases.5 The early addition of gabapentin provided a rapid, synergistic antinociceptive effect through dual-channel blockade of sodium and calcium channels, achieving swift pain control without dose-limiting toxicities.12 Conclusion: Combining lamotrigine and gabapentin represents a highly effective, safe, and easily accessible oral regimen for immediate and sustained control of high-frequency episodic SUNCT in clinical practice.4