Tumanggor, MS
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparison of Online Gambling Legal Regulations Between Indonesia and The United States Darmawan, Nino Gilang; Tumanggor, MS; Hakim, Lukman
Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (April - June 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Review & Yayasan Sinergi Inovasi Bersama (SIBER)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/sijal.v3i4.356

Abstract

Gambling in Indonesia has historically been a social ill strictly prohibited by various regulations, such as Article 303 of the Criminal Code, Law No. 7 of 1974, and the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law. However, a legal dualism currently exists , where gambling is prohibited for moral and religious reasons, while a legal loophole exists through the terms "without permission" and "without rights" in the law. This loophole manifests itself in the legality of business permits for gambling and betting activities (such as casinos, slot machines, and online games ) under KBLI codes 9200 and 92000 through the business licensing system . The regulation of online gambling in Indonesia demonstrates inconsistencies compared to the United States, which strictly enforces regional (state)-based regulations. In Indonesia, there is a contradiction between the spirit of eradicating gambling and the emergence of legal business permits within the standard business classification. Therefore, a special review and regulatory improvement are needed by the government and legislative bodies to close this legal loophole and prevent misuse by irresponsible parties
Comparison of Law Enforcement of Narcotics Crimes in Indonesia and Thailand: Regulation and Case Handling Putra, Telly Areska; Tumanggor, MS; Sriwidodo, Joko
Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (April - June 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Review & Yayasan Sinergi Inovasi Bersama (SIBER)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/sijal.v3i4.359

Abstract

Narcotics are a global threat that requires comprehensive legal action, particularly in Indonesia and Thailand, as strategic areas for illicit trafficking. This study aims to analyze the comparative regulations, investigative methods, and effectiveness of law enforcement against narcotics crimes in both countries. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative, conceptual, and analytical approach through secondary data from reports from 2024-2026. The results show that Indonesia maintains a strict policy with the threat of the death penalty but has begun to adopt restorative justice through Law No. 1 of 2023 and Prosecutor's Regulation No. 18 of 2021. In contrast, Thailand has undertaken a radical transformation through the Narcotics Code BE 2564 , which prioritizes public health and the decriminalization of certain substances. In practice, Indonesia excels in specialized investigative techniques, while Thailand is effective in border operations and asset seizures. In conclusion, both countries are transitioning from a punitive approach to a system that better balances legal and health aspects. The success of law enforcement in the future depends heavily on the integration of financial intelligence to impoverish drug lords and the effectiveness of rehabilitation in reducing recidivism rates, given the high number of suspects reaching tens of thousands each year in both regions