Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal BIMASAKTI
Ginanjar, Wismo
Unknown Affiliation
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN METODE NAÏVE BAYES DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE PADA ANALISIS SENTIMEN NETIZEN DI TWITTER VOLLEY BALL INDONESIA Ginanjar, Wismo; Budianto, Alexius Endy; Ahsan, Moh
Jurnal Fakultas Teknologi Informasi Vol 8 No 2 (2026): BIMASAKTI
Publisher : Prodi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21067/bimasakti.v8i2.12376

Abstract

Social media has become an integral part of modern society, offering a platform for public opinion expression. In Indonesia, volleyball is a very popular sport, and Volley Ball Indonesia is the main topic of discussion on social media, especially Twitter. This study aims to analyze the sentiment of netizen comments on the official Twitter account of Volley Ball Indonesia (@volleyball.indonesia) using the Naive Bayes method and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The data used amounted to 2,920 comments from 50 posts in the period of September 28, 2023 - May 10, 2024, focused on the U-23 and Senior Men's National Team matches. Naïve Bayes and SVM were chosen because both are effective methods in sentiment classification. Naïve Bayes uses a probabilistic approach, while SVM looks for the best hyperplane to separate data classes. The results of the study show that both methods can be used to analyze sentiment with a good level of accuracy. The test results on each training data and testing data with different presentations will provide different accuracy results. The test results of the Naive Bayes method obtained the highest accuracy value of 71% with a ratio of 70:30 and the Support Vector Machine obtained the highest accuracy value of 76% with a ratio of 80:20. So it can be concluded that the Support Vector Machine method gets a higher accuracy value than the Naive Bayes method.
Co-Authors Ahsan, Moh Budianto, Alexius Endy