Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.961
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan
Halimatul Maryani
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Nusantara (UMN) Al Washliyah, Indonesia

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA IN SHAPING PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF NARCOTICS TRAFFICKERS: A CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 1235/PID.SUS/2025/PN MDN Arjuna; Halimatul Maryani
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of mass media in shaping public perceptions of drug dealers and its impact on the judicial process and judicial independence. The focus of the research is directed at mass media coverage of narcotics crime cases in Decision Number 1235/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Mdn, in which the defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment despite the public prosecutor demanding the death penalty. The findings indicate that mass media play a highly significant role in shaping public perceptions of drug dealers through mechanisms of framing and agenda setting. Media coverage, particularly that which emphasizes the large quantity of evidence and the disparity between the prosecutor’s demand and the judge’s decision, constructs a specific social reality that influences how the public understands narcotics cases. Such coverage has an indirect impact on the judicial process and perceptions of judicial independence. Although normatively and factually judges continue to render decisions based on the law and facts presented at trial, confrontational and sensational media framing has the potential to create moral pressure and affect public trust in judicial institutions. There is a correlation between the intensity and type of media framing and the level of public support for court decisions: the greater the intensity of coverage and the stronger the framing highlighting disparities between prosecutorial demands and judicial rulings, the greater the tendency for the public to be critical of or to reject judicial decisions. However, this correlation is social-communicative in nature and should not be interpreted as a causal relationship that binds judges in rendering their decisions.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL ACT OF AGGRAVATED ASSAULT (CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 208/PID.B/2025/PN BNJ) Wahyudi; Halimatul Maryani
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

assault according to the provisions of the applicable criminal law consists of the Court summoning witnesses and victims to provide testimony at the trial, the Court conducting physical evidence testing, examination and response of the defendant to defend himself and respond to the evidence presented, the Court assessing witness testimony, physical evidence, and other documents to ensure the truth of the facts. The analysis of evidence for the crime of serious assault in the Decision of the Binjai District Court Number 208 / Pid.B / 2025 / PN Bnj has been carried out correctly by the panel of judges. Criminal liability for the perpetrator of serious assault in the Decision of the Binjai District Court Number 208 / Pid.B / 2025 / PN Bnj is liability with a prison sentence of 5 years because it has been legally and convincingly proven to have committed acts of serious assault against the victim. The defendant's actions were carried out consciously, not under duress or without justification.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 170 PARAGRAPH (1) OF THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE CRIME OF COLLECTIVE VIOLENCE (A STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 1935/PID.B/2025/PN MDN) Taslim; Halimatul Maryani
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Criminal Code (KUHP) in the crime of collective violence, to examine the legal construction of violence committed by joint force from the perspective of positive Indonesian criminal law, and to analyze the legal reasoning of judges in rendering a decision in Case Number 1935/Pid.B/2025/PN Mdn. The results of the study show that the application of Article 170 paragraph (2) point 1 of the KUHP, which provides for a maximum imprisonment of seven years if the offender intentionally damages property or if the violence used results in injuries, has been carried out appropriately, as all elements of the offense were proven lawfully and convincingly. The legal construction of the crime of violence committed by joint force places the element of collective action as the primary aggravating factor without requiring a detailed division of roles. The judges’ legal considerations in this case reflect a balance between juridical, sociological, and philosophical aspects, taking into account the protection of victims, the social impact of the act, and fairness for the defendants. Accordingly, the decision can be legally justified and reflects the objectives of sentencing within the framework of positive Indonesian criminal law.
ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPOSING PUNISHMENTS FOR NARCOTICS CRIMES (A STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 1891/PID.SUS/2025/PN MDN) Jeffri; Halimatul Maryani
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Narcotics crimes constitute an extraordinary crime that has serious impacts on security and the future of the nation’s younger generation, thereby requiring firm and just law enforcement. This research aims to analyze the application of substantive criminal law and the judicial considerations in imposing criminal sanctions on the defendant in Decision Number 1891/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Mdn, using a normative legal research method with statutory and case study approaches, supported by primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that the application of substantive criminal law in the decision is in accordance with Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, with proof based on lawful evidence as stipulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The judges’ considerations were carried out comprehensively by taking into account both juridical and non-juridical aspects, including the fulfillment of the elements of the offense, the role of the defendant, the type and quantity of narcotics, as well as aggravating and mitigating circumstances, so that the sentence imposed reflects the principle of proportionality and a balance between legal certainty, justice, and expediency.
DISPARITY IN JUDGES’ DECISIONS ON THE CRIME OF AGGRAVATED THEFT (AN ANALYSIS OF DECISION NUMBER 968/PID.B/2025/PN MDN AND DECISION NUMBER 1445/PID.B/2025/PN MDN) Suko Madioso; Halimatul Maryani
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Based on the results of the study, it shows that the form of disparity in the judge's decision in the case of aggravated theft based on decision number 968 / Pid.B / 2025 / PN Mdn and Number 1445 / Pid.B / 2025 / PN Mdn is the difference in sentencing to the defendant, namely a 4-year prison sentence for Defendant M. Irfan and a 5-month prison sentence for Defendant Fasi Duhu Baene. The judge's consideration in deciding the defendant's guilt in decisions number 968 and Number 1445 is appropriate. The suitability of the judge's decision with the provisions of criminal law related to aggravated theft in decisions number 968 and number 1445 has been implemented well and the provision of proportional sanctions is appropriate except in Decision Number 1445 which is less proportional because the Defendant was only sentenced to 5 months in prison.
CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF A WIFE WHO PLANNED THE MURDER OF HER HUSBAND IN THE DECISION OF THE MEDAN DISTRICT COURT NUMBER 284/PID.B/2025/PN MDN Revalino Perangin-Angin; Halimatul Maryani
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Based on the research results, it shows that the process and standard of proof of the element with premeditation in the crime of premeditated murder committed by a wife against her husband begins with collecting various evidence that supports the existence of a prior plan. Then the Judge conducts an objective evaluation of all the evidence and statements submitted. The judge's consideration in assessing the evidence and trial facts related to the motive in the premeditated murder case based on the Medan District Court Decision Number 284 / Pid.B / 2025 / PN Mdn is appropriate. The criminal liability of the wife who planned the murder of her husband based on Decision Number 284 is sentenced to 18 years in prison or 2 years lighter than the maximum prison sentence stipulated by Article 340 of the Criminal Code. The leniency of criminal liability is due to mitigating factors for the defendant, namely the defendant has children, one of whom is still in education.
Co-Authors Arjuna Jeffri Revalino Perangin-Angin Suko Madioso Taslim Wahyudi