Muhammad Ridwan Lubis
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Nusantara (UMN) Al Washliyah, Indonesia

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF IMPRISONMENT SENTENCES FOR PERPETRATORS OF EMBEZZLEMENT BY TRUCK DRIVERS (A STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 288/PID.B/2025/PN SRH) Leader Binent Manullang; Muhammad Ridwan Lubis
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Based on the results of the study, it shows that the process of the crime of embezzlement of cargo by the driver in Decision Number 288 / Pid.B / 2025 / PN Srh began when the victim ordered the Defendant to pick up oil palm shells in Siak Regency, then the Defendant transported 32 tons of oil palm shells and took them to the Patumbak area. However, on the way the defendant sold 10 tons of the shells to an unknown person. The proof of the criminal elements in the crime of embezzlement in Decision Number 288 is correct, namely the proof of the elements has been proven based on evidence of witness testimony, the defendant, and evidence of indications. The legal analysis of the prison sentence against the truck driver who embezzled his cargo in Decision Number 288 is that the defendant was sentenced to 2 years in prison. The sentence is considered to have taken into account the principles of justice and legal effectiveness
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS AGAINST INTERMEDIARIES IN NARCOTICS SALES (A STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 395/PID.SUS/2025/PN STB) Muhammad Imanuddin; Muhammad Ridwan Lubis
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Based on the results of the study, it shows that the criminal law regulations for intermediaries in narcotics sales are regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, namely Article 114, the threat of imprisonment of at least 5 years and a maximum of 20 years, Article 119, the threat of imprisonment of at least 4 years and a maximum of 12 years, Article 124, the threat of imprisonment of at least 3 years and a maximum of 10 years. Proof of the elements of the crime committed by the accused intermediary for narcotics sales in Decision Number 395 / Pid.Sus / 2025 / PN Stb is appropriate because it has used two minimum pieces of evidence as regulated in Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The legal analysis of the punishment for the perpetrators of intermediary sales of narcotics in Decision Number 395 is quite fair, namely defendants I and III were sentenced to 10 years in prison, defendant II because he had never been imprisoned received leniency with a prison sentence of 9 years.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF PERPETRATORS OF COLLECTIVE VIOLENCE IN THE DECISION OF THE MEDAN DISTRICT COURT NUMBER 1245/PID.B/2025/PN MDN Rudi Simamora; Muhammad Ridwan Lubis
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Based on the results of the study, it shows that the elements of the crime of violence committed together consist of the element of whoever, the element of openly, the element of joint force, the element of using violence, the element against people or goods. The proof of the crime of violence committed together in Decision Number 1245 / Pid.B / 2025 / PN Mdn is appropriate, namely the proof of the element of whoever and the element of intentionally in public together committing violence against people or goods resulting in the destruction of goods or causing serious injury has been proven based on evidence of witness statements, statements of the defendant, written evidence, and evidence of indications. The responsibility of the perpetrator of the crime of violence committed together in Decision Number 1245 is to be sentenced to 3 years in prison. The decision of the panel of judges is inappropriate and too light
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF ELECTRICITY-RELATED CRIMES COMMITTED BY BITCOIN MINING EMPLOYEES IN THE DECISION OF THE MEDAN DISTRICT COURT NUMBER 497/PID.SUS/2024/PN MDN Putra Junico; Muhammad Ridwan Lubis
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Barokah Publsiher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Based on the research results, it shows that there are no specific legal regulations governing the crime of electricity theft in Indonesia, particularly in the context of Bitcoin mining activities. However, if the electricity is used illegally, Article 362 of the Criminal Code concerning Theft or Article 51 paragraph (3) of Law No. 30 of 2009 concerning Electricity can be used. The elements of the crime of electricity theft applied to the theft case in Decision Number 497/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Mdn are appropriate and legally based, namely, proven by the existence of witness testimony, documentary evidence, indicative evidence, and the defendant's testimony. Criminal liability for perpetrators of electricity theft in Decision Number 497 is a prison sentence of 5 years and 6 months and a fine of Rp1,000,000,000.00